This really is adding batching support to custom lua delivery
protocol handlers, but the main use case for these today is
to implement log hooks.
The way that it works is that you can specify a `batch_size`
as part of setting up the lua protocol handler.
Then, when it is time to send messages, if the batch_size is
the default of 1, the lua delivery logic will invoke the `send` method
on the connection object returned from the constructor. This
is the same as the behavior from before this commit.
However, if the batch_size is greater than 1, then the lua delivery
logic will instead attempt to collect up to batch_size messages
that are immediately available from the ready queue, and then pass
those to a new `send_batch` method.
The send_batch method accepts an array of messages; that array will
always have at least one message, and up to batch_size messages,
depending on the throughput and queue size.
If the send_batch method's return value applies equally to all
messages in the batch, so if it indicates that something failed,
that disposition will apply to all messages.
One of the reasons that I'd avoided implementing batching thus far
was that it makes it awkward to resolve persistent/recurring issues
that are due to a single message in that batch. If the batch is
always retried together then there is a good chance that it will
always fail together.
There's no explicit mitigation for that issue here, but it may
be probablistically mitigated by the jitter that is applied to
messages that transiently fail. If a batch transiently fails,
each message in that batch will be subject to its own random
jitter which should cause an offending message to be retried
with a different subset of messages next time around.
The integration test included here demonstrates the batching
working with an http log hook implementation.
This enables shaping based on MX hostname and domain name matching
rules.
At a lower level, this is supported via two new options:
additional_connection_limits and additional_message_rate_throttles that
allow specifying arbitrarily scoped named limits and throttles, which
in addition to allowing provider-based rules in the shaping helper,
allow things like global or other more esoteric scoping of constraints.
closes: https://github.com/KumoCorp/kumomta/pull/260
try to nudge folks away from adopting copypasta of the advanced
section; we've seen more than few people using this when they
should just use the sources policy helper.
Add the note about the weighted robin implementation to make_egress_pool
as well.
Wez Furlong
Mike Hillyer
Laurent Marchaud
tommairs
Daniel Schaaff