Previously, you would do either:
`msg:set_meta('queue', 'smart.host.domain')`
or
`msg:set_meta('queue', '[10.0.0.1]')`
to override the effective domain for a message and cause it to be routed
to somewhere other than the recipient domain.
That was OK for basic smart hosting, but limiting when you wanted to use
multiple candidate hosts.
This commit expands the queue config `protocol` field to support
specifying an explicit list of MX hosts that should be used instead.
The integration tests have been migrated away from the old style to this
new style.
While adding plumbing for this, I uncovered an inconsistency between the
queue name generated for the ready queue and the name used by suspension
handling. The inconsistency was introduced in
0842a0fc8b and related work. This commit
resolves it.
The name is passed through to should_enqueue_log_record as an additonal
parameter to make it possible to reason about whether a given record
should get queued for a specific log hook instance.
This is a breaking change, but it can be easily resolved by adding
the name parameter to the `configure_log_hook` call.
These are two different groups of queues, so there are two different
sets of things to manage them.
kcli now has `suspend(-list|cancel)?` and
`suspend-ready-q(-list|cancel)?` subcommands for establishing a
suspension, listing the suspensions and cancelling a suspension
in the scheduled-q and ready-q namespaces respectively.
The names of the ready queues can be derived from the metrics API:
```console
$ curl -s 'http://localhost:8000/metrics.json' | jq .
...
"ready_count": {
"help": "number of messages in the ready queue",
"type": "gauge",
"value": {
"service": {
"smtp_client:source2->(in1-smtp|in2-smtp).messagingengine.com": 0.0
}
}
},
...
```
From the above, `source2->(in1-smtp|in2-smtp).messagingengine.com` is
the name of the underlying ready queue.
We can and probably should add something to `kcli` to make that slightly
easier to review and manage for the operator.
refs: https://github.com/KumoCorp/kumomta/issues/51
This is relatively basic in that it can catch general lua lints,
but doesn't know about the set of functions available to kumo.
It doesn't appear as though selene is able to be extended to
know about those yet; that is tracked by
https://github.com/Kampfkarren/selene/issues/520
I've fixed the couple of lints in our policy and test files
as part of this commit.
You can install and run it like this:
```console
$ cargo install selene
```
Then:
```console
$ selene .
```
This has our first end-to-end integration test that validates
smtp -> source mta -> sink mta -> maildir
and confirms that the message has the right bits inside it.
The end to end test will get refactored into more easily usable
pieces in follow-up commit(s).
Wez Furlong