The bindings are built, installed and published with pnpm everywhere,
but a parallel npm dependency graph was still being maintained beside
it. This removes it, raises the supported Node floor to the versions we
actually test, and gives Dependabot the npm coverage it was missing.
## Dropping npm
`nodejs/package-lock.json` was regenerated by `ci/update_lockfiles.sh`
on every release commit and read by nothing — no workflow runs `npm ci`
or `npm install` in `nodejs/`, and npm never publishes a lockfile in a
package tarball. It could not even agree with the real install, since
npm does not see pnpm's `overrides`. Because GitHub's dependency graph
parses `package-lock.json`, it was also reporting vulnerabilities for a
tree we neither install nor ship.
`docs/package.json`, `docs/package-lock.json` and `docs/tsconfig.json`
go too. They depend on `file:../node` and
`file:../node/node_modules/apache-arrow` — the `node/` directory was
removed long ago — the tsconfig compiles `src/*.ts` where no TypeScript
files exist, and nothing installs any of it. `docs.yml` only referenced
the lockfile to configure an npm cache for an install it never ran.
Two `workflow_dispatch` workflows for regenerating those lockfiles are
removed as well. Both were already broken: they `uses:` composite
actions at `.github/workflows/update_package_lock{,_nodejs}` that do not
exist, so dispatching either failed immediately.
The remaining `npx` calls become direct `node_modules/.bin/...`
invocations. These were already running locally installed binaries
rather than resolving anything, but naming the binary removes the npm
CLI from the loop and does not depend on which Node version is active.
`dev.yml`'s commitlint check was the last place doing real npm
dependency resolution — an unpinned `npm install
@commitlint/config-conventional` that also bypassed the
`minimumReleaseAge` hold configured for `nodejs/` — and is now a pinned
`pnpm dlx`.
## Node support
Node 18 and 20 both reached end-of-life, in April 2025 and April 2026.
The matrix moves to 22, 24 and 26, and `engines` rises from `>= 18` to
`>= 22` so the declared floor is one the matrix actually covers. Node 22
is LTS until April 2027; 24 is LTS; 26 is Current and becomes LTS in
October 2026.
This also removes the reason the workflows reached for `npx` in the
first place: pnpm 11 requires Node >= 22.13, which every matrix version
now satisfies.
The prebuilt-binary smoke test in `npm-publish.yml` moves from Node 20
to Node 22 — the floor, where a napi ABI problem would surface first —
rather than fanning out across all three, to keep the publish matrix
from tripling.
## Dependabot
There were no npm-ecosystem entries at all, which is why the advisories
behind #4073 went unnoticed. Both pnpm lockfiles are now watched —
`nodejs/` and `nodejs/examples/`, which is a separate install — using
the same `lockfile-only` strategy as the existing cargo and pip entries,
so version ranges in `package.json` are left alone.
## Pre-commit biome
The hook ran `npx @biomejs/biome@1.8.3` while `nodejs/package.json`
resolved 1.9.4. The two disagree about formatting, so the hook rejected
code that `pnpm lint` accepts, and failed on unmodified `main` for
anyone touching `nodejs/`. It now uses the pnpm-managed biome, which
fixes the drift with no source changes.
## Testing
`dev.yml`'s commitlint job does not check out the repo, so it runs in an
empty workspace, and I could not verify `pnpm/action-setup` there
locally. It triggers on `pull_request_target`, so this PR exercises it
directly — worth confirming green before merge. I did verify the `pnpm
dlx` invocation itself locally: it accepts a conventional title and
rejects a non-conventional one with exit 1.
Node 26 is new enough that the examples job may surface gaps in prebuilt
native binaries (`onnxruntime-node`, `sharp`) before their maintainers
publish for it.
## Not included
`nodejs/examples/` still pins `sharp: "0.33.5"` and has its own audit
findings. Raising the Node floor unblocks that work — sharp 0.35
requires Node >= 20.9, which the matrix now satisfies — but it is a
dependency bump rather than tooling cleanup, so it is left separate.
## Breaking changes
`@lancedb/lancedb` now requires Node >= 22; previously >= 18. The
`@types/node` peer range moves from `>=18` to `>=22` to match. Users on
Node 18 or 20 must upgrade their runtime; both have been end-of-life for
some time. Existing installs are unaffected, since `engines` is only
checked on install.
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
## Summary
- require Node.js 18-compatible type declarations when TypeScript
consumers install them
- keep the type peer optional for JavaScript-only consumers
- add a regression test tying the Node type peer range to the supported
runtime
## Root cause
LanceDB requires Node.js 18 or newer, and its public types expose Apache
Arrow declarations that import built-ins through the node: scheme. The
package did not declare a matching @types/node peer requirement, so npm
accepted projects pinned to Node 12 declarations and TypeScript then
reported that node:stream and node:fs/promises did not exist.
## Validation
- pnpm lint
- pnpm build
- pnpm run docs
- pnpm test --runInBand (678 passed, 5 skipped)
- packed-package consumer probe rejects @types/node 12.20.55 and
installs with @types/node 18.19.130
Fixes#1713
<!-- lance-gatekeeper-fix:v1 agent=7a2b68f3daad20bed9e46cb8892d6e6c
generation=1 -->
Co-authored-by: Gatefixer <313497061+lancedb-gatefixer[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Python was versioned and tagged separately from the Rust, Java, and
Node.js SDKs, and had drifted three minor versions ahead (0.36 vs 0.33).
Users had no way to tell which Python version corresponded to which Rust
or Node release, and the gap had no meaning behind it.
This unifies the two tracks so there is one version and one tag for all
four SDKs.
## Version
The shared version is set to `0.37.0-beta.0`. Python continues its own
sequence (highest published: 0.36 → 0.37) while Rust, Java, and Node.js
jump 0.33 → 0.37 to meet it. Picking Python's next minor means Python
users see no discontinuity at all, and only the other SDKs skip forward.
Note that `main` trails the `release/v0.32` branch on both lines (main
is at 0.32.0-beta.3 / 0.35.0-beta.3; the release branch carries
0.33.0-beta.0 / 0.36.0-beta.0), so 0.37 is chosen to clear the highest
tag on either branch. Every index stays monotonic:
| index | publishes | last published | next |
|---|---|---|---|
| PyPI | stable only | 0.34.0 | 0.37.0 |
| Fury | previews | 0.36.0b0 | 0.37.0-beta.1 |
| npm | both | 0.33.0-beta.0 | 0.37.0-beta.1 |
| crates.io | stable only | 0.31.0 | 0.37.0 |
| Maven | both | 0.33.0-beta.0 | 0.37.0-beta.1 |
A one-time jump for three SDKs, versus explaining the offset
indefinitely.
## Mechanism
* `python/.bumpversion.toml` is removed. `python/Cargo.toml` — the
source of the Python package version, since `pyproject.toml` declares
`dynamic = ["version"]` — becomes a tracked file of the root config. Its
`cargo update -p lancedb-python` pre-commit hook is dropped as
redundant: `ci/update_lockfiles.sh` already refreshes every workspace
member version in `Cargo.lock`.
* `pypi-publish.yml` triggers on `v*` instead of `python-v*`, so one tag
releases all four packages. `ci/bump_version.sh` and
`make-release-commit.yml` lose their now-dead tag-prefix and
per-language plumbing, including the `python` / `other` dispatch inputs.
* The two byte-identical GH release jobs in `npm-publish.yml` and
`pypi-publish.yml` are replaced by a single `gh-release.yml`. One
release per tag, named `LanceDB vX.Y.Z`, instead of separate "Python
LanceDB" and "Node/Rust LanceDB" releases for the same commit.
The trade-off: there is no longer a way to ship a Python-only patch
without also releasing crates.io, Maven, and npm. That is the cost of
making drift structurally impossible.
## Beta releases marked "Latest" (#3666)
Both GH release jobs used:
```yaml
prerelease: ${{ contains('beta', github.ref) }}
```
The arguments are reversed. `contains(search, item)` asks whether
*`search`* contains *`item`*, so this evaluated "does the literal string
`'beta'` contain `refs/tags/python-v0.35.0-beta.2`?" — always `false`.
Every beta was published as a full release, and GitHub awards "Latest"
to the newest non-prerelease.
The new workflow derives the flag from the parsed version rather than
the raw ref, and sets `make_latest` explicitly:
```yaml
prerelease: ${{ steps.extract_version.outputs.prerelease }}
make_latest: ${{ steps.extract_version.outputs.prerelease == 'false' }}
```
npm was never affected (`--tag preview` uses correct bash), and PyPI
already excludes pre-releases from resolution.
This only fixes releases published from here on. Already-published betas
need a one-time backfill:
```shell
gh api --paginate /repos/lancedb/lancedb/releases \
--jq '.[] | select(.prerelease == false) | select(.tag_name | test("beta")) | .id' \
| xargs -I{} gh api -X PATCH /repos/lancedb/lancedb/releases/{} -F prerelease=true
```
## Verification
Ran `ci/bump_version.sh` end-to-end against this branch with the release
tooling installed:
* `preview` → tags `v0.37.0-beta.1` (previous tag `v0.33.0-beta.0`
detected, `pre_n` bump)
* `stable` → tags `v0.37.0`
* Both paths update `.bumpversion.toml`, `rust/lancedb/Cargo.toml`,
`nodejs/Cargo.toml`, `python/Cargo.toml`, `nodejs/package.json`, the 7
`nodejs/npm/*/package.json` files, both Java poms, and
`docs/src/java/java.md` together
* `check_breaking_changes.py` resolves the last stable as `v0.31.0`, so
the minor-version gate passes
All five touched workflows parse as valid YAML and the pre-commit hooks
pass.
## Notes for review
* This targets `main` only, so it takes effect at the next
release-branch cut. The in-flight `release/v0.32` branch still carries
`v0.33.0-beta.0` / `python-v0.36.0-beta.0`; if we want the imminent
stable to be 0.37.0, this needs to be applied there too.
* Historical `python-v*` tags are left alone. The changelog builder
scans `^v`, which does not match them, so the first unified release's
notes will compute `fromTag` from the Rust/Node line only — a one-time
gap in the Python-side changelog.
* Pre-existing and not addressed here: `ci/update_lockfiles.sh --amend`
amends the commit that `bump-my-version` has already tagged, so the
lockfile update lands outside the tag on stable releases.
Fixes#3666
Bridges Lance's internal `metrics`-crate instrumentation (object store
request counts, bytes, latency, errors, and throttles) into
OpenTelemetry, in both the Python and Node bindings, with a shared
adapter in the Rust core. This is the LanceDB counterpart to
lance-format/lance#7537.
## Rust core (`rust/lancedb`)
Two new, **off-by-default** features:
- `metrics` — re-exports the [`metrics`](https://docs.rs/metrics) crate
as `lancedb::metrics` and turns on Lance's object-store instrumentation.
Install any `metrics`-compatible recorder to collect them.
- `metrics-otel` — adds `lancedb::metrics_otel`, a pull-based adapter
that installs a process-global recorder aggregating into lock-free
cumulative storage and exposes a snapshot/catalog API
(`register_metrics_recorder`, `metrics_catalog`, `snapshot_metrics`,
`MetricPoint`/`MetricValue`/`MetricKind`/`MetricDescription`). Both
bindings build on this.
## Python
`lancedb.otel.instrument_lancedb_metrics()` registers each metric as an
OpenTelemetry observable instrument on the given (or global)
`MeterProvider`. Available via the `otel` extra (`pip install
lancedb[otel]`), which pulls in only `opentelemetry-api` — the
application supplies and configures the SDK.
## Node
`instrumentLanceDbMetrics()` provides the equivalent wiring against
`@opentelemetry/api`. This is the only public entry point; the
underlying recorder/catalog/snapshot functions stay internal.
Because OpenTelemetry has no asynchronous histogram instrument,
histograms are exported Prometheus-style as `<name>_bucket` (with an
`le` attribute), `<name>_count`, and `<name>_sum`. Only `_sum` carries
the histogram's unit; `_bucket` and `_count` observe cumulative counts
and are unitless. The adapter is enabled by default in the Python and
Node builds, and off by default in the Rust crate.
## Notes
- Requires Lance ≥ `v9.0.0-beta.19`, which ships the object-store
metrics APIs (upstream lance-format/lance#7537, now merged). `main` is
already on beta.19, so this is a single feature commit with no
dependency bump.
- Tests: 8 Rust unit tests, 3 Python tests, 2 Node tests, all covering
the end-to-end object-store-metrics → OpenTelemetry path.
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
## Summary
Fixes the `NAPI_RS_FORCE_WASI=false` issue by upgrading `@napi-rs/cli`
from `3.5.1` to `3.7.0`.
Closes#3267
## Root Cause
In the `native.js` loader generated by `napi build`, the check was:
```js
if (!nativeBinding || process.env.NAPI_RS_FORCE_WASI) {
```
In JavaScript, any non-empty string is truthy, so
`NAPI_RS_FORCE_WASI=false` (a non-empty string) inadvertently triggered
the WASI fallback path. This caused an `ENOENT` error when
`lancedb.wasi.cjs` was not present.
## Fix
`@napi-rs/cli@3.7.0`
([napi-rs/napi-rs#3236](https://github.com/napi-rs/napi-rs/pull/3236))
introduced a tri-state check in the template that generates `native.js`:
**Before (generated by @napi-rs/cli@3.5.1):**
```js
if (!nativeBinding || process.env.NAPI_RS_FORCE_WASI) {
```
**After (generated by @napi-rs/cli@3.7.0):**
```js
const forceWasi =
process.env.NAPI_RS_FORCE_WASI === 'true' || process.env.NAPI_RS_FORCE_WASI === 'error'
if (!nativeBinding || forceWasi) {
```
Only the literal string `'true'` (or `'error'` for strict mode) now
activates the WASI path. All other values, including `'false'`, `'0'`,
or an unset variable, behave as if WASI is not forced.
## Changes
- `nodejs/package.json`: bump `@napi-rs/cli` from `3.5.1` to `3.7.0`
- `nodejs/package-lock.json` / `nodejs/pnpm-lock.yaml`: update lock
files to match
The fix is in the upstream napi-rs tool; the generated `native.js` is
not committed to this repository and is produced at build time by `napi
build`.
The 0.29 release happened on a branch because the main line had already
moved past the 6.0.0 stable lance release. As a result the version bump
commits ended up on the branch. This merges those commits back into
main.
---------
Co-authored-by: Lance Release <lance-dev@lancedb.com>
## Summary
Switch the nodejs bindings and examples package from npm to pnpm 11 to
pick up its stronger supply-chain defaults:
- `minimumReleaseAge` defaults to 1 day, so newly-published (potentially
compromised) versions aren't resolved into installs for at least 24h.
- Install lifecycle scripts (`preinstall`/`install`/`postinstall`) are
no longer run for arbitrary transitive deps; only an explicit allowlist
may run them, and unapproved scripts cause install to fail
(`strictDepBuilds: true`).
- Audit uses GHSA IDs and `--fix=update` to add patched versions to
`minimumReleaseAgeExclude`.
This is the same class of protection that would have blunted the recent
TanStack/`@uipath`/etc. compromise discussed in the [Aikido
write-up](https://www.aikido.dev/blog/mini-shai-hulud-is-back-tanstack-compromised).
## Changes
- Replace `nodejs/package-lock.json` and
`nodejs/examples/package-lock.json` with `pnpm-lock.yaml`.
- Pin pnpm via `packageManager: pnpm@11.1.1` in both `package.json`s.
- Add `pnpm-workspace.yaml` with the four build-script packages we
actually need: `@biomejs/biome`, `onnxruntime-node`, `protobufjs`,
`sharp`. Everything else is blocked from running install scripts.
- Update package.json scripts (`npm run X` → `pnpm X`).
- Update workflows: `.github/workflows/nodejs.yml`,
`.github/workflows/npm-publish.yml`, and
`.github/workflows/codex-fix-ci.yml` — install pnpm via
`pnpm/action-setup@v4` and switch `setup-node` caches to
`pnpm-lock.yaml`.
- Refresh `nodejs/AGENTS.md`, `nodejs/CLAUDE.md`, and
`nodejs/CONTRIBUTING.md`.
`docs/package-lock.json` is **not** touched — out of scope for this PR.
## Test plan
- [ ] `Lint` job (lint Rust/TS + examples lint) passes on CI.
- [ ] `Linux (NodeJS 18/20)` build+test passes, including the examples
test step.
- [ ] `macos` build+test passes.
- [ ] `NPM Publish` workflow's PR dry-run completes (build matrix + test
matrix + dry `npm publish`).
- [ ] No new install-script approvals are required at install time.
## Follow-ups
- `update_package_lock_run_nodejs.yml` references a composite action
path that doesn't exist
(`./.github/workflows/update_package_lock_nodejs`); it was already
broken pre-PR. We may want to either delete this workflow or rewrite it
for pnpm in a follow-up.
- Consider migrating `docs/` to pnpm in a separate PR.
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
The `build:release` command already outputs the `*.node` files directly
to the `dist/` directory via the `--output-dir dist` flag.
Therefore, the `postbuild:release` script, which attempts to copy
`*.node` files from the `lancedb/` source directory, fails with a "no
such file or directory" error because the source files do not exist
there.
This commit removes the redundant `postbuild:release` script to resolve
the build failure.
fix#3284
Signed-off-by: qingfeng-occ <qing.feng@zte.com.cn>