Both the lancedb client and the geneva client expose
`create_materialized_view`, and they are not the same feature. The page said
materialized views are local only, which is true of this client and misleading
for anyone on Enterprise, where views are created through geneva and refreshed
on the cluster.
Found by assembling the combined site and reading the Geneva pages against the
new ones: they described the same call as distributed and Enterprise while this
one described it as raising. Both were accurate about their own client and
neither said which client it meant.
The feature engineering documentation describes the geneva package, a separate
SDK. The capability it covers now lives in this client — materialized views,
computed columns, and registered functions are all shipped API with no pages
describing them.
Four pages cover the three mechanisms and, more usefully, when each applies.
The overview leads with that choice rather than with concepts, because the
mechanisms overlap and picking the wrong one is the expensive mistake.
Two things they say plainly that the API reference cannot:
Declaring and filling are separate everywhere, and filling never revisits a row
it has already done. That makes refreshes idempotent and appends cheap, and it
means a filled value does not track its inputs — surprising if you expect a
spreadsheet, so it is stated rather than left to be discovered.
The availability split runs the opposite way to expectation. Materialized views
are local only and raise on a remote connection; functions are Cloud and
Enterprise only and raise on a local one. Someone reading about both in one
sitting will otherwise assume the usual direction and be wrong in one of them.
Examples are the tested ones from the docstrings, so they cannot drift from the
behaviour they describe.
The training and tutorial pages that pointed into the geneva documentation now
point here.
Jack Ye