The bindings are built, installed and published with pnpm everywhere,
but a parallel npm dependency graph was still being maintained beside
it. This removes it, raises the supported Node floor to the versions we
actually test, and gives Dependabot the npm coverage it was missing.
## Dropping npm
`nodejs/package-lock.json` was regenerated by `ci/update_lockfiles.sh`
on every release commit and read by nothing — no workflow runs `npm ci`
or `npm install` in `nodejs/`, and npm never publishes a lockfile in a
package tarball. It could not even agree with the real install, since
npm does not see pnpm's `overrides`. Because GitHub's dependency graph
parses `package-lock.json`, it was also reporting vulnerabilities for a
tree we neither install nor ship.
`docs/package.json`, `docs/package-lock.json` and `docs/tsconfig.json`
go too. They depend on `file:../node` and
`file:../node/node_modules/apache-arrow` — the `node/` directory was
removed long ago — the tsconfig compiles `src/*.ts` where no TypeScript
files exist, and nothing installs any of it. `docs.yml` only referenced
the lockfile to configure an npm cache for an install it never ran.
Two `workflow_dispatch` workflows for regenerating those lockfiles are
removed as well. Both were already broken: they `uses:` composite
actions at `.github/workflows/update_package_lock{,_nodejs}` that do not
exist, so dispatching either failed immediately.
The remaining `npx` calls become direct `node_modules/.bin/...`
invocations. These were already running locally installed binaries
rather than resolving anything, but naming the binary removes the npm
CLI from the loop and does not depend on which Node version is active.
`dev.yml`'s commitlint check was the last place doing real npm
dependency resolution — an unpinned `npm install
@commitlint/config-conventional` that also bypassed the
`minimumReleaseAge` hold configured for `nodejs/` — and is now a pinned
`pnpm dlx`.
## Node support
Node 18 and 20 both reached end-of-life, in April 2025 and April 2026.
The matrix moves to 22, 24 and 26, and `engines` rises from `>= 18` to
`>= 22` so the declared floor is one the matrix actually covers. Node 22
is LTS until April 2027; 24 is LTS; 26 is Current and becomes LTS in
October 2026.
This also removes the reason the workflows reached for `npx` in the
first place: pnpm 11 requires Node >= 22.13, which every matrix version
now satisfies.
The prebuilt-binary smoke test in `npm-publish.yml` moves from Node 20
to Node 22 — the floor, where a napi ABI problem would surface first —
rather than fanning out across all three, to keep the publish matrix
from tripling.
## Dependabot
There were no npm-ecosystem entries at all, which is why the advisories
behind #4073 went unnoticed. Both pnpm lockfiles are now watched —
`nodejs/` and `nodejs/examples/`, which is a separate install — using
the same `lockfile-only` strategy as the existing cargo and pip entries,
so version ranges in `package.json` are left alone.
## Pre-commit biome
The hook ran `npx @biomejs/biome@1.8.3` while `nodejs/package.json`
resolved 1.9.4. The two disagree about formatting, so the hook rejected
code that `pnpm lint` accepts, and failed on unmodified `main` for
anyone touching `nodejs/`. It now uses the pnpm-managed biome, which
fixes the drift with no source changes.
## Testing
`dev.yml`'s commitlint job does not check out the repo, so it runs in an
empty workspace, and I could not verify `pnpm/action-setup` there
locally. It triggers on `pull_request_target`, so this PR exercises it
directly — worth confirming green before merge. I did verify the `pnpm
dlx` invocation itself locally: it accepts a conventional title and
rejects a non-conventional one with exit 1.
Node 26 is new enough that the examples job may surface gaps in prebuilt
native binaries (`onnxruntime-node`, `sharp`) before their maintainers
publish for it.
## Not included
`nodejs/examples/` still pins `sharp: "0.33.5"` and has its own audit
findings. Raising the Node floor unblocks that work — sharp 0.35
requires Node >= 20.9, which the matrix now satisfies — but it is a
dependency bump rather than tooling cleanup, so it is left separate.
## Breaking changes
`@lancedb/lancedb` now requires Node >= 22; previously >= 18. The
`@types/node` peer range moves from `>=18` to `>=22` to match. Users on
Node 18 or 20 must upgrade their runtime; both have been end-of-life for
some time. Existing installs are unaffected, since `engines` is only
checked on install.
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Did a full scan of all URLs that used to point to the old mkdocs pages,
and now links to the appropriate pages on lancedb.com/docs or lance.org
docs.
---------
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **Documentation**
- Updated the link in the documentation to correctly reference the
workflow file, ensuring accurate navigation from the current context.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
Signed-off-by: Guspan Tanadi <36249910+guspan-tanadi@users.noreply.github.com>
This PR makes incremental changes to the documentation.
* Closes#697
* Closes#698
- [x] Add dark mode
- [x] Fix headers in navbar
- [x] Add `extra.css` to customize navbar styles
- [x] Customize fonts for prose/code blocks, navbar and admonitions
- [x] Inspect all admonition boxes (remove redundant dropdowns) and
improve clarity and readability
- [x] Ensure that all images in the docs have white background (not
transparent) to be viewable in dark mode
- [x] Improve code formatting in code blocks to make them consistent
with autoformatters (eslint/ruff)
- [x] Add bolder weight to h1 headers
- [x] Add diagram showing the difference between embedded (OSS) and
serverless (Cloud)
- [x] Fix [Creating an empty
table](https://lancedb.github.io/lancedb/guides/tables/#creating-empty-table)
section: right now, the subheaders are not clickable.
- [x] In critical data ingestion methods like `table.add` (among
others), the type signature often does not match the actual code
- [x] Proof-read each documentation section and rewrite as necessary to
provide more context, use cases, and explanations so it reads less like
reference documentation. This is especially important for CRUD and
search sections since those are so central to the user experience.
- [x] The section for [Adding
data](https://lancedb.github.io/lancedb/guides/tables/#adding-to-a-table)
only shows examples for pandas and iterables. We should include pydantic
models, arrow tables, etc.
- [x] Add conceptual tutorial for IVF-PQ index
- [x] Clearly separate vector search, FTS and filtering sections so that
these are easier to find
- [x] Add docs on refine factor to explain its importance for recall.
Closes#716
- [x] Add an FAQ page showing answers to commonly asked questions about
LanceDB. Closes#746
- [x] Add simple polars example to the integrations section. Closes#756
and closes#153
- [ ] Add basic docs for the Rust API (more detailed API docs can come
later). Closes#781
- [x] Add a section on the various storage options on local vs. cloud
(S3, EBS, EFS, local disk, etc.) and the tradeoffs involved. Closes#782
- [x] Revamp filtering docs: add pre-filtering examples and redo headers
and update content for SQL filters. Closes#783 and closes#784.
- [x] Add docs for data management: compaction, cleaning up old versions
and incremental indexing. Closes#785
- [ ] Add a benchmark section that also discusses some best practices.
Closes#787
---------
Co-authored-by: Ayush Chaurasia <ayush.chaurarsia@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Will Jones <willjones127@gmail.com>
Fix broken link to embedding functions
testing: broken link was verified after local docs build to have been
repaired
---------
Co-authored-by: Chang She <chang@lancedb.com>
Will Jones
Gezi-lzq
Prashanth Rao
Guspan Tanadi
Lei Xu
Chang She