Files
lancedb/docs/web/basics/jobs.mdx
T
Jack Ye 83595ac839 docs: add data types to Basics, split the demo gallery, regroup tabs
Basics gains a Schema & Data Types section -- the Arrow types a table can hold,
the extension types Lance adds on top (lance.json, lance.blob.v2,
lance.bfloat16), and where geospatial actually stands. The multimodal page moves
in beside it. Consistency joins Basics too, after Query & Job.

Query & Job now leads with the thing the _async convention actually gives you: a
handle. execute_query_async returns a query, everything else returns a job, and
both answer the same four questions -- which one, how is it going, give me the
result, stop. Only the third differs, because a query produces rows to stream
and a job produces an outcome to wait for.

Management gains a Materialized View page. Creating one was documented only on
the refresh page, and the stable-row-ids requirement is a creation-time
decision that cannot be undone.

Embeddings move to Integrations as the Embedding Registry, which is what they
are -- a client-side feature that wraps provider models, sitting above the
providers it registers.

The demo gallery was three apps on one page; it is now three pages. Use Cases
folds into Tutorials as Tutorials and Use Cases.
2026-09-09 23:38:50 -07:00

293 lines
10 KiB
Plaintext

---
title: "Query and job"
sidebarTitle: "Query & Job"
description: "Sync and async in LanceDB: two different distinctions that use the same word."
icon: hourglass-half
keywords: ["job", "async", "sync", "query", "background", "await"]
---
"Async" means two unrelated things in LanceDB, and conflating them is the most
common source of confusion about how work gets done.
| | What it is | What it changes |
| --- | --- | --- |
| **Async client** | `connect_async`, `await` | whether *your thread* blocks |
| **Async execution** | `_async` methods returning a handle | whether *the work* outlives the call |
They are independent. A synchronous Python call can start work that runs for an
hour; an `await` can wait for something that finishes instantly.
## Every `_async` method returns a handle {#handles}
An `_async` method submits work and hands back a **handle** to it. Which handle
depends on what you submitted -- `execute_query_async` returns a query,
everything else returns a [job](#jobs) -- but they are the same idea, and they
answer the same four questions:
| | Query handle | Job handle |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Which one is this? | `id` | `id` |
| How is it going? | `describe()` | `status()`, `refresh()`, `events()` |
| Give me the result | `reader()` — streams batches as they arrive | `wait()` — blocks for the terminal result |
| Stop it | `cancel()` | `cancel()` |
The difference is in the third row, and it follows from what the work produces.
A query produces **rows**, so its handle streams them and you can start reading
before the query finishes. A job produces **an outcome** -- an index built, a
column filled -- so its handle has nothing to stream and gives you the result
once, at the end.
Everything else is shared: both identify the work on the server, both report on
it without blocking, and both can be told to stop.
## Async client: whether you block {#async-client}
A concern of your language, not of LanceDB. The work is identical either way.
<CodeGroup>
```python Python icon="python"
db = lancedb.connect("db://my-db", api_key="...") # blocking
tbl = db.open_table("documents")
db = await lancedb.connect_async("db://my-db", api_key="...") # coroutines
tbl = await db.open_table("documents")
```
```typescript TypeScript icon="square-js"
// TypeScript is async throughout; there is no blocking form.
const db = await lancedb.connect("db://my-db", { apiKey: "..." });
const tbl = await db.openTable("documents");
```
</CodeGroup>
Python offers both. `AsyncConnection` exposes the same surface as coroutines, so
choosing between them is about the program you are writing -- a service wants
the async form, a script does not care.
## Queries: reading before the query finishes {#queries}
A query is not a job, but it has the same shape of choice: wait for everything,
or take a handle and start reading.
<CodeGroup>
```python Python icon="python"
reader = db.execute_query("SELECT id, text FROM my_docs LIMIT 1000")
table = reader.read_all()
query = db.execute_query_async("SELECT id, text FROM my_docs")
```
```sql SQL
SELECT id, text FROM my_docs LIMIT 1000
```
</CodeGroup>
`execute_query` returns a blocking Arrow reader **once results start arriving**
-- it does not wait for the whole query to finish. Results stream as record
batches, so a large result set does not have to fit in memory before you see its
first row.
`execute_query_async` returns the query handle instead:
```python
query = db.execute_query_async("SELECT id, text FROM my_docs")
query.id # identifies it on the server
query.describe() # what it is doing, without consuming results
reader = query.reader() # stream the rows when you want them
query.cancel() # stop it
```
`describe_query(id)` reports on one from elsewhere, the way `open_job(id)` does
for a job.
<Note>
SQL requires a deployment. See [SDKs and SQL](/basics/apis).
</Note>
Query-builder searches -- vector, full-text, hybrid -- are ordinary calls that
return results. They are fast enough not to need a handle. See
[Query](/search).
## Jobs: work that outlives the call {#jobs}
Some operations take longer than a request should. Building an index over a
large table, refreshing a computed column, registering a function -- these run
on the server after the call that started them has returned.
Each is submitted the same way and returns the same handle.
### The `_async` convention {#convention}
An operation that can run in the background has two forms. The plain name blocks
until the work is done. The `_async` / `Async` name submits the work and returns
a **job** immediately.
| Blocking | Returns a job | SQL |
| --- | --- | --- |
| `create_index` | `create_index_async` | `CREATE INDEX` |
| `refresh_column` | `refresh_column_async` | `REFRESH COLUMN` |
| `create_function` | `create_function_async` | `CREATE FUNCTION` |
| `drop_table` | `drop_table_async` | `DROP TABLE` |
<Note>
The blocking form is not a different operation -- it submits the same job and
waits. Reach for the `_async` form when you want to do something else meanwhile,
run several at once, or survive the client going away.
</Note>
### Submitting and waiting {#waiting}
<CodeGroup>
```python Python icon="python"
job = table.create_index_async("vector")
print(job.id) # the server's id for this operation
print(job.status()) # "running" | "finished" | "failed" | "cancelled"
job.wait() # blocks until terminal; raises if it failed
```
```typescript TypeScript icon="square-js"
const job = await table.createIndexAsync("vector");
console.log(job.id); // the server's id for this operation
console.log(await job.status()); // "running" | "finished" | "failed" | "cancelled"
await job.wait(); // resolves when terminal; rejects if it failed
```
</CodeGroup>
`wait` is the one call that raises on failure. `status` is a point snapshot and
returns the failed state rather than raising, which is what you want in a
polling loop.
In Python `wait` takes an optional timeout and returns the operation's typed
result -- a `RefreshColumnJobResult`, a `FunctionVersion`, or `None` for an
operation that has no result:
```python
from datetime import timedelta
result = table.refresh_column_async("embedding").wait(timeout=timedelta(minutes=30))
```
`TimeoutError` means the timeout elapsed, not that the job stopped. The job is
still running; the handle just gave up watching.
<Note>
The TypeScript `wait()` resolves to `void`. Read the outcome from `result` after
it resolves.
</Note>
### Inspecting a job {#inspecting}
Submitting an operation returns only an id, so the detail fields are empty until
the handle fetches the record. `refresh()` does that; `status()` does it as a
side effect.
<CodeGroup>
```python Python icon="python"
job.refresh()
job.state # last observed state, without another round trip
job.job_type # what kind of job, as the server names it
job.creation_ms # when it was created, epoch milliseconds
job.spec # what it was submitted with
job.result # its terminal result, once it succeeds
job.failure # why it failed, when it did
```
```typescript TypeScript icon="square-js"
await job.refresh();
job.state; // last observed state, without another round trip
job.jobType; // what kind of job, as the server names it
job.creationMs; // when it was created, epoch milliseconds
job.spec; // what it was submitted with
job.result; // its terminal result, once it succeeds
job.failure; // why it failed, when it did
```
</CodeGroup>
Printing the handle renders every field it knows, which is usually faster than
reading them one at a time.
### Progress, from events {#events}
`result` only tells you anything once the job has finished. Events are written
as it runs, and they outlive the workers that produced them -- so a job that is
still going, or one that never finished, can still account for what it did.
<CodeGroup>
```python Python icon="python"
events = job.events(limit=5000, filter="state = 'claim_complete'")
```
```typescript TypeScript icon="square-js"
const events = await job.events({ limit: 5000, filter: "state = 'claim_complete'" });
```
```sql SQL
SHOW ERRORS ON my_table FOR JOB 'job-id' LIMIT 100
```
</CodeGroup>
A distributed job records a `claim` / `claim_complete` pair per unit of work,
each carrying `rows_processed`. Summing `rows_processed` over the completed
claims is how you get progress on a job that has no percentage.
`filter` is a SQL-like expression over `state`, `updated_by`, `emitted_from`,
`emitted_by`, and `claim_entity`.
<Warning>
The server returns 1000 event rows by default and 10,000 at most, and
**truncates without telling you**. A job that emits an event per fragment will
silently lose its tail unless you pass `limit`.
</Warning>
Events are recorded server-side, so this raises for an operation that ran
in-process.
### Finding and cancelling jobs {#managing}
The connection lists and reopens jobs, so a handle lost to a restarted process
is recoverable from its id.
<CodeGroup>
```python Python icon="python"
db.list_jobs() # every job the server knows about
job = db.open_job(job_id) # reattach to one
db.cancel_job(job_id) # ask it to stop
```
```typescript TypeScript icon="square-js"
await db.listJobs();
const job = await db.openJob(jobId);
await db.cancelJob(jobId);
```
```sql SQL
SHOW JOBS
```
</CodeGroup>
Cancellation is a request, not a guarantee, and cancelling a job that already
finished does nothing. `JobNotFoundError` means the id does not name a job the
server still has.
<Warning>
A job id is opaque. It correlates with server logs and the calls above, but
parsing it or storing it to resume the job later is not supported.
</Warning>
## In-process jobs {#in-process}
A local database has no server to run anything, so its operations run in your
process. They still return a handle, so the same code works against both -- but
one with nothing behind it: `id` is `None`, `status()` reports `"finished"`,
`wait()` returns immediately, `cancel()` does nothing, and `events()` raises.
This is the difference to expect when moving between embedded and deployed --
see [SDKs and SQL](/basics/apis).