mirror of
https://github.com/lancedb/lancedb.git
synced 2026-10-30 15:26:52 +00:00
## Summary - Complete the SQL reference: `ATTACH DATABASE`, the `CHANGES` clause, and `dedupe()`/`duplicate_pairs()` (verified against current sophon source; these were recently renamed from `vector_dedup`/`vector_duplicate_pairs`). Fix the blob-column default-projection claim and add the previously undocumented `blob_descriptor()`. - Enrich the gated Functions draft (still `.mintignore`'d, pre-release): chained Functions over blob outputs, GPU-produced blobs, Secrets, multi-input/output binding, `code=[module]` packaging. - Upgrade the materialized-view and computed-column auto-refresh drafts with precise, verified catch-up semantics, and add the missing `ALTER MATERIALIZED VIEW` / `CREATE ... WITH(...)` sections (also gated — the automatic-refresh scheduler is still dev/staging-only). - Thread one running example (video frames → GPU extract/caption → dedup → auto-refreshing materialized view) through Functions, materialized views, and the LeRobotDataset integration guide instead of a separate tutorial. - Rename "LanceDB OSS"/"OSS" to "LanceDB Embedded"/"Embedded" throughout (52 files); activate the existing availability-comparison mechanism on `basics/offerings.mdx` for a full feature-by-feature comparison table.
130 lines
5.6 KiB
Plaintext
130 lines
5.6 KiB
Plaintext
---
|
|
title: "Data curation"
|
|
sidebarTitle: "Overview"
|
|
description: "Prepare datasets for search, evaluation and training by profiling, selecting and combining records."
|
|
icon: filter
|
|
keywords: ["curation", "dataset", "training set", "sampling", "deduplication", "class balance"]
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
Data curation turns a collection of records into a dataset suited to a task.
|
|
You might select labeled examples for training, prepare a fixed evaluation
|
|
set, or remove duplicate documents from a search corpus.
|
|
|
|
Start with the result you need. Then inspect the source data, choose which
|
|
records belong, and save the selected data or the rules used to produce it.
|
|
|
|
## Choose a curation task {#questions}
|
|
|
|
| Task | What it helps you decide |
|
|
| --- | --- |
|
|
| [Create a Function](/curation/create-function) | How to run your own Python -- on CPU, on GPU, or against a remote service -- as part of SQL. |
|
|
| [Chunk records](/curation/chunking) | How to split one record into several -- passages, clips, or tiles. |
|
|
| [Scope to what changed](/curation/changes) | How to process only the rows added since your last run. |
|
|
| [Profile a dataset](/curation/aggregate) | Whether coverage, missing values and class balance suit the task. |
|
|
| [Sample records](/curation/sampling) | Which subset to inspect or use for an experiment. |
|
|
| [Join datasets](/curation/join) | How to attach labels, metadata or scores stored elsewhere. |
|
|
| [Rank and deduplicate](/curation/windowing) | Which records to keep when several share an explicit key. |
|
|
| [Deduplicate near-duplicates](/curation/dedupe) | Which records to collapse when they only look alike, with no shared key. |
|
|
|
|
The analytical examples in this section use **Enterprise SQL**. Connect with
|
|
the [SQL guide](/basics/sql). For sampling through the Python SDK in LanceDB Embedded or
|
|
LanceDB Enterprise, see [Sample without SQL](/curation/sampling#training).
|
|
|
|
## Prepare a labeled document dataset {#shape}
|
|
|
|
Suppose you need one labeled record per document for a training experiment.
|
|
Inspect the source records, choose the latest version of each document, then
|
|
join its label. Finally, check the class balance of the selected records.
|
|
|
|
### Example data {#example-data}
|
|
|
|
Connect with an [Enterprise SQL client](/basics/sql). The examples use a small
|
|
document table and a separate label table. Expand the setup below to create them.
|
|
|
|
<Accordion title="Create the example tables">
|
|
|
|
`curation_documents` has six records describing four documents.
|
|
`curation_labels` has one label for each of three documents. `row_id` identifies
|
|
a record; `doc_id` identifies the document it describes.
|
|
|
|
Run each statement separately in a scratch database or namespace. Create these
|
|
tables once for the whole section, using fresh names if they already exist.
|
|
|
|
```sql
|
|
CREATE TABLE curation_documents (
|
|
row_id BIGINT, doc_id BIGINT, version BIGINT,
|
|
source VARCHAR, caption VARCHAR, score DOUBLE
|
|
);
|
|
INSERT INTO curation_documents VALUES
|
|
(1, 10, 1, 'web', NULL, 0.80),
|
|
(2, 10, 2, 'web', 'A cat on a chair', 0.95),
|
|
(3, 20, 1, 'books', 'A dog in a field', 0.90),
|
|
(4, 30, 1, 'web', NULL, 0.70),
|
|
(5, 30, 1, 'web', 'A cat by a window', 0.85),
|
|
(6, 40, 1, 'books', 'A bird in a tree', 0.60);
|
|
|
|
CREATE TABLE curation_labels (doc_id BIGINT, label VARCHAR);
|
|
INSERT INTO curation_labels VALUES
|
|
(10, 'cat'), (20, 'dog'), (30, 'cat');
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
`score` is a sample quality score, not a search result score. Document 10 has
|
|
two versions. Document 30 has two records at the same version. Document 40
|
|
has no label. These cases let you check the effect of each operation.
|
|
|
|
</Accordion>
|
|
|
|
The following query chooses the latest record for each document, then keeps
|
|
only documents with a label:
|
|
|
|
```sql
|
|
WITH ranked AS (
|
|
SELECT *, row_number() OVER (
|
|
PARTITION BY doc_id ORDER BY version DESC, row_id DESC
|
|
) AS rn
|
|
FROM curation_documents
|
|
)
|
|
SELECT d.row_id, d.doc_id, d.caption, l.label
|
|
FROM ranked AS d
|
|
JOIN curation_labels AS l ON l.doc_id = d.doc_id
|
|
WHERE d.rn = 1
|
|
ORDER BY d.doc_id;
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
The result contains documents **10, 20 and 30**, with labels **cat, dog and
|
|
cat**. Document 40 is excluded because this particular task requires a label.
|
|
The `row_id` tie-breaker makes the choice for document 30 deterministic;
|
|
choose a tie-breaker that fits your own data.
|
|
|
|
The example assumes one label per document. Duplicate keys in the label table
|
|
would multiply the result rows. The [joining guide](/curation/join#labels)
|
|
shows how to check that assumption.
|
|
|
|
## Check the selected dataset {#check-result}
|
|
|
|
Compare the result with the task's requirements: are the expected documents
|
|
present, are required fields populated, and is the class distribution suitable?
|
|
This example has two cats and one dog. That distribution may be appropriate
|
|
for exploration, but it does not establish a representative evaluation set.
|
|
|
|
[Profiling](/curation/aggregate) provides the counts to inspect.
|
|
[Sampling](/curation/sampling) and [ranking](/curation/windowing) help you
|
|
adjust the selection without changing the original records.
|
|
|
|
## Save and reuse the result {#next}
|
|
|
|
Choose the output according to how you will use it:
|
|
|
|
- **A fixed dataset:** save the query result in a new table with
|
|
[`CREATE TABLE AS SELECT`](/sql/ddl/table#create). Keep that output unchanged
|
|
when comparing experiments.
|
|
- **A reusable selection:** save the query as a [view](/management/view).
|
|
A view stores the query definition, so it is not a frozen evaluation set.
|
|
- **Stored results that you refresh:** use a
|
|
[materialized view](/management/materialized-view) when its supported query
|
|
and refresh behavior fit the workflow.
|
|
|
|
Record the source versions and selection rules alongside the output. Continue
|
|
with [data loading](/training/data-loading) to use the curated data in a
|
|
training pipeline.
|