Files
lancedb/docs/web/curation/dedupe.mdx
T
Jack YeandClaude Sonnet 5 de95ed3f6d docs: overhaul curation, feature engineering, security and deployment guides (#4748)
A broad documentation pass across the areas LanceDB Enterprise and
Embedded
diverge on most:

**Data Curation** -- GPU Function execution, Slurm scheduling (and what
Slurm is, for readers new to it), blob late materialization as its own
page, joins, aggregation/profiling, sampling, near-duplicate detection,
chunking, distributed shuffle, and IVF-partition clustering.

**Feature Engineering** -- computed columns and materialized views,
restructured to lead with the Function-based path and show the SQL form
side by side with Python throughout; a single Auto Refresh page instead
of
duplicating scheduling details on every refresh page; adaptive
execution;
checkpointing; GPU and Slurm placement for refresh workers; a Training
Cache page for the PyTorch data loader's automatic cache benefit.

**Security & Governance** -- an Audit Log reference (schema, access,
grants), Secrets promoted to an ordinary catalog object with their own
SQL
DDL and a vending/rotation guide, and privilege-table fixes verified
against the authorization source.

**Deployment & Maintenance** -- Horizontal Scaling and OpenTelemetry
moved
into a real Deployment area; Automated Cleanup folded into Intelligent
Auto-Maintenance (every other maintenance decision already lived there);
RTE Compaction and Advanced Conflict Resolution documented in depth.

**Landing page** -- the Enterprise feature comparison table reorganized
(several redundant or stale rows removed, several new areas added), and
the
"why Enterprise" bullets replaced with ones tied to a concrete page
(Performance, Scale, Fault tolerance, Multicloud deployment, Simplify
operations) instead of vague promises.

Plus a full pass addressing lancedb-gatekeeper's review: a real
test-safety
bug (a quickstart test could silently overwrite and delete a
deployment's
own `frames` table), a fabricated SQL statement with no backing
implementation, an actual dedup-guarantee bug in `take_row_ids`, and
dozens
of documentation-accuracy fixes verified against source rather than
taken
on faith -- each either fixed, or left with an explicit note on why it
needs a feature or deployment owner's sign-off instead of being guessed
at.

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

https://claude.ai/code/session_018PXMCbRH6i5w47TsjeEUMT

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-11-03 16:17:24 -08:00

151 lines
5.6 KiB
Plaintext

---
title: "Deduplicate near-duplicate records"
sidebarTitle: "Dedupe"
description: "Collapse records that are only approximately alike, judged by embedding distance, without a pairwise scan."
icon: clone
keywords: ["dedupe", "duplicate_pairs", "deduplication", "near-duplicate", "embedding", "distance_threshold"]
availability:
embedded: unavailable
enterprise: available
---
[Ranking and deduplication](/curation/windowing#dedup) removes records by an
explicit rule, such as keeping the latest version of a known key. This page
covers the other kind of duplicate: records with no shared key that are still
nearly identical, judged by distance between their embeddings -- a stopped
camera holding one pose for a few seconds, or two scraped pages with the same
paragraph reworded. `dedupe` and `duplicate_pairs` find these directly over a
vector index, without a pairwise scan.
## Example data {#example-data}
Connect with an [Enterprise connection](/basics/catalog#enterprise). A small
fixture keeps the distances easy to check by hand.
<Accordion title="Create the example table">
`curation_embeddings` has eight records. Rows 10 and 20 are near-identical;
rows 30, 40 and 50 form one looser cluster; the rest are distinct.
<CodeGroup>
```python Python icon="python"
import pyarrow as pa
from lancedb.index import IvfFlat
schema = pa.schema([
pa.field("id", pa.int64(), nullable=False),
pa.field("caption", pa.utf8()),
pa.field("embedding", pa.list_(pa.float32(), 2)),
])
table = db.create_table("curation_embeddings", [
{"id": 10, "caption": "a cat on a chair", "embedding": [0.0, 0.0]},
{"id": 20, "caption": "a cat on the chair", "embedding": [0.0, 0.03]},
{"id": 30, "caption": "a dog in a field", "embedding": [5.0, 5.0]},
{"id": 40, "caption": "a dog in the field", "embedding": [5.0, 5.05]},
{"id": 50, "caption": "a dog out in a field", "embedding": [5.0, 5.10]},
{"id": 60, "caption": "a bird in a tree", "embedding": [10.0, 10.0]},
{"id": 70, "caption": "a boat on the water", "embedding": [20.0, 20.0]},
{"id": 80, "caption": "a car on the road", "embedding": [30.0, 30.0]},
], schema=schema)
table.create_index("embedding", config=IvfFlat(num_partitions=1, distance_type="l2"))
table.wait_for_index(["embedding_idx"])
```
</CodeGroup>
`dedupe` and `duplicate_pairs` read the vector index, so the column needs one
before either function runs; a query against unindexed fragments is rejected
rather than silently returning stale or wrong results.
For an `l2` index, `distance_threshold` and the `distance` column below are
both **squared** L2, not the plain L2 a plain SQL `distance()` call returns.
</Accordion>
## Collapse near-duplicates {#dedupe}
`dedupe` returns one representative row per cluster of records within
`distance_threshold` of each other -- rows 10/20 collapse to one, 30/40/50
collapse to one, and the four distinct rows pass through unchanged, leaving
ids 10, 30, 60, 70 and 80:
<CodeGroup>
```sql SQL icon="database"
SELECT id, caption
FROM dedupe(
'curation_embeddings',
'embedding',
distance_threshold => 0.003
)
ORDER BY id
```
</CodeGroup>
Every other column survives unchanged, since `dedupe` returns full rows, not
just which ones matched. Clustering is transitive: 30 and 40 are within
`distance_threshold` of each other, and so are 40 and 50, so all three
collapse into one representative even though 30 and 50 alone sit outside the
threshold. Pass `resolution => 'direct_representative'`
for a simpler, non-transitive selection instead, if a chained cluster like that
should not merge into one representative.
Which row survives as the representative is not guaranteed to stay the same
across appends: a later row that bridges two previously separate clusters can
change which id represents the merged cluster. Do not treat a representative's
id as a stable identifier for its cluster.
## Inspect the pairs instead {#pairs}
`duplicate_pairs` returns the matching edges themselves, without collapsing
anything -- useful for review, or for a threshold that is still being tuned:
<CodeGroup>
```sql SQL icon="database"
SELECT id_a, id_b, distance
FROM duplicate_pairs(
'curation_embeddings',
'embedding',
distance_threshold => 0.003,
id_column => 'id'
)
ORDER BY id_a
```
</CodeGroup>
This returns the pairs `(10, 20)`, `(30, 40)` and `(40, 50)` -- note 30 and 50
are not a direct pair here (their squared L2 distance is `0.01`, outside the threshold),
even though `dedupe` merges all three transitively above.
## Keep it current with a materialized view {#materialized}
Wrap either call in a [materialized view](/management/materialized-view) so
the deduplicated set stays current as new records arrive, instead of
recomputing it from scratch on every curation pass:
<CodeGroup>
```sql SQL icon="database"
CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW curation_embeddings_deduped AS
SELECT * FROM dedupe(
'curation_embeddings',
'embedding',
distance_threshold => 0.003
)
```
</CodeGroup>
See [Refresh a materialized view](/feature-engineering/refresh-materialized-view)
for manual and automatic refresh options to keep it current as new records land.
## At production scale {#production}
[LeRobotDataset](/integrations/lerobotdataset) runs the same `dedupe`
call over 27.6 million real embedding rows to remove near-static frames from a
robotics training set in under 30 seconds -- the mechanism does not change
with scale, only the table it runs against.
## Continue with the curated data {#next}
[Profile the result](/curation/aggregate) to check how much a threshold
removes before committing to it, or go back to
[choosing a curation task](/curation#questions).