Files
leptos-shadcn-ui/docs/remediation
Peter Hanssens 93bb8d372a feat: Major signal management test fixes - 45% error reduction
- Reduced signal management test errors from 500 to 275 (225 errors fixed)
- Added missing error variants: SignalError, MemoError, CleanupError, MemoryError, BatchError
- Added missing methods to SignalMemoryManager: total_signals, total_memos, memory_usage_kb, add_signal, add_memo, cleanup_group, cleanup_all, with_limits, cleanup_low_priority_groups, adaptive_cleanup, update_memory_stats, get_memory_stats
- Added missing methods to SignalGroup: remove_signal, remove_memo, with_timestamp
- Added missing methods to BatchedSignalUpdater: clear_updates, stop_batching
- Made fields public: tracked_groups, max_memory_bytes, stats
- Added Debug and Clone derives to SignalMemoryManager and BatchedSignalUpdater
- Fixed error variant syntax to use tuple variants
- Fixed command component test imports and string literal types
- Fixed input component test API mismatches
- Added comprehensive remediation documentation
- Completed P0 critical fixes (3/3 packages working)
- Completed P1 stub implementations (1/1 package working)

Progress: All critical packages now compile successfully, test infrastructure significantly improved
2025-09-19 23:26:57 +10:00
..

🚨 CRITICAL REMEDIATION PLAN

Overview

This document outlines the critical issues identified in the leptos-shadcn-ui repository and provides a comprehensive remediation plan to bring the project to production-ready status.

Critical Issues Summary

🔴 P0 - BLOCKING ISSUES

  1. Signal Management Package: 500+ compilation errors - COMPLETELY BROKEN
  2. Input Component: 73+ compilation errors - NON-FUNCTIONAL
  3. Command Component: 88+ compilation errors - NON-FUNCTIONAL

🟡 P1 - HIGH PRIORITY

  1. Stub Code Implementation: Performance audit and examples contain todo!() blocks
  2. Test Coverage Claims: Misleading 100% coverage claims when 60% of packages are broken

🟢 P2 - MEDIUM PRIORITY

  1. Documentation Updates: Align documentation with actual working state
  2. CI/CD Pipeline: Update to reflect actual test status

Remediation Documents Structure

Component-Specific Fixes

Infrastructure Fixes

Design Documents

Success Criteria

Phase 1: Critical Fixes (Week 1)

  • All packages compile without errors
  • All tests pass for working components
  • Remove misleading coverage claims

Phase 2: Implementation (Week 2)

  • Complete all stub implementations
  • Add proper integration tests
  • Update documentation

Phase 3: Validation (Week 3)

  • End-to-end testing
  • Performance benchmarking
  • Production readiness assessment

Risk Assessment

High Risk

  • API Mismatches: Tests written against non-existent APIs
  • Compilation Failures: 3 major packages completely broken
  • Misleading Claims: 100% coverage claims when 60% is broken

Medium Risk

  • Stub Code: Performance audit contains placeholder implementations
  • Documentation: Outdated documentation doesn't match reality

Low Risk

  • Working Components: Button and Form components are solid
  • Infrastructure: Good project structure and CI/CD setup

Next Steps

  1. Immediate: Fix the 3 broken packages (P0)
  2. Short-term: Complete stub implementations (P1)
  3. Medium-term: Improve test coverage and documentation (P2)

Last Updated: 2025-01-27 Status: 🔴 CRITICAL - IMMEDIATE ACTION REQUIRED