mirror of
https://github.com/neondatabase/neon.git
synced 2025-12-23 06:09:59 +00:00
Cancel PG query if stuck at refreshing configuration (#12717)
## Problem While configuring or reconfiguring PG due to PageServer movements, it's possible PG may get stuck if PageServer is moved around after fetching the spec from StorageController. ## Summary of changes To fix this issue, this PR introduces two changes: 1. Fail the PG query directly if the query cannot request configuration for certain number of times. 2. Introduce a new state `RefreshConfiguration` in compute tools to differentiate it from `RefreshConfigurationPending`. If compute tool is already in `RefreshConfiguration` state, then it will not accept new request configuration requests. ## How is this tested? Chaos testing. Co-authored-by: Chen Luo <chen.luo@databricks.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -54,11 +54,11 @@ stateDiagram-v2
|
||||
Running --> TerminationPendingImmediate : Requested termination
|
||||
Running --> ConfigurationPending : Received a /configure request with spec
|
||||
Running --> RefreshConfigurationPending : Received a /refresh_configuration request, compute node will pull a new spec and reconfigure
|
||||
RefreshConfigurationPending --> Running : Compute has been re-configured
|
||||
RefreshConfigurationPending --> RefreshConfiguration: Received compute spec and started configuration
|
||||
RefreshConfiguration --> Running : Compute has been re-configured
|
||||
RefreshConfiguration --> RefreshConfigurationPending : Configuration failed and to be retried
|
||||
TerminationPendingFast --> Terminated compute with 30s delay for cplane to inspect status
|
||||
TerminationPendingImmediate --> Terminated : Terminated compute immediately
|
||||
Running --> TerminationPending : Requested termination
|
||||
TerminationPending --> Terminated : Terminated compute
|
||||
Failed --> RefreshConfigurationPending : Received a /refresh_configuration request
|
||||
Failed --> [*] : Compute exited
|
||||
Terminated --> [*] : Compute exited
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1994,6 +1994,7 @@ impl ComputeNode {
|
||||
// wait
|
||||
ComputeStatus::Init
|
||||
| ComputeStatus::Configuration
|
||||
| ComputeStatus::RefreshConfiguration
|
||||
| ComputeStatus::RefreshConfigurationPending
|
||||
| ComputeStatus::Empty => {
|
||||
state = self.state_changed.wait(state).unwrap();
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ use std::fs::File;
|
||||
use std::thread;
|
||||
use std::{path::Path, sync::Arc};
|
||||
|
||||
use anyhow::Result;
|
||||
use compute_api::responses::{ComputeConfig, ComputeStatus};
|
||||
use tracing::{error, info, instrument};
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -13,6 +14,10 @@ fn configurator_main_loop(compute: &Arc<ComputeNode>) {
|
||||
info!("waiting for reconfiguration requests");
|
||||
loop {
|
||||
let mut state = compute.state.lock().unwrap();
|
||||
/* BEGIN_HADRON */
|
||||
// RefreshConfiguration should only be used inside the loop
|
||||
assert_ne!(state.status, ComputeStatus::RefreshConfiguration);
|
||||
/* END_HADRON */
|
||||
|
||||
if compute.params.lakebase_mode {
|
||||
while state.status != ComputeStatus::ConfigurationPending
|
||||
@@ -54,53 +59,68 @@ fn configurator_main_loop(compute: &Arc<ComputeNode>) {
|
||||
info!(
|
||||
"compute node suspects its configuration is out of date, now refreshing configuration"
|
||||
);
|
||||
// Drop the lock guard here to avoid holding the lock while downloading spec from the control plane / HCC.
|
||||
// This is the only thread that can move compute_ctl out of the `RefreshConfigurationPending` state, so it
|
||||
state.set_status(ComputeStatus::RefreshConfiguration, &compute.state_changed);
|
||||
// Drop the lock guard here to avoid holding the lock while downloading config from the control plane / HCC.
|
||||
// This is the only thread that can move compute_ctl out of the `RefreshConfiguration` state, so it
|
||||
// is safe to drop the lock like this.
|
||||
drop(state);
|
||||
|
||||
let spec = if let Some(config_path) = &compute.params.config_path_test_only {
|
||||
// This path is only to make testing easier. In production we always get the spec from the HCC.
|
||||
info!(
|
||||
"reloading config.json from path: {}",
|
||||
config_path.to_string_lossy()
|
||||
);
|
||||
let path = Path::new(config_path);
|
||||
if let Ok(file) = File::open(path) {
|
||||
match serde_json::from_reader::<File, ComputeConfig>(file) {
|
||||
Ok(config) => config.spec,
|
||||
Err(e) => {
|
||||
error!("could not parse spec file: {}", e);
|
||||
None
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
error!(
|
||||
"could not open config file at path: {}",
|
||||
let get_config_result: anyhow::Result<ComputeConfig> =
|
||||
if let Some(config_path) = &compute.params.config_path_test_only {
|
||||
// This path is only to make testing easier. In production we always get the config from the HCC.
|
||||
info!(
|
||||
"reloading config.json from path: {}",
|
||||
config_path.to_string_lossy()
|
||||
);
|
||||
None
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else if let Some(control_plane_uri) = &compute.params.control_plane_uri {
|
||||
match get_config_from_control_plane(control_plane_uri, &compute.params.compute_id) {
|
||||
Ok(config) => config.spec,
|
||||
Err(e) => {
|
||||
error!("could not get config from control plane: {}", e);
|
||||
None
|
||||
let path = Path::new(config_path);
|
||||
if let Ok(file) = File::open(path) {
|
||||
match serde_json::from_reader::<File, ComputeConfig>(file) {
|
||||
Ok(config) => Ok(config),
|
||||
Err(e) => {
|
||||
error!("could not parse config file: {}", e);
|
||||
Err(anyhow::anyhow!("could not parse config file: {}", e))
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
error!(
|
||||
"could not open config file at path: {:?}",
|
||||
config_path.to_string_lossy()
|
||||
);
|
||||
Err(anyhow::anyhow!(
|
||||
"could not open config file at path: {}",
|
||||
config_path.to_string_lossy()
|
||||
))
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
None
|
||||
};
|
||||
} else if let Some(control_plane_uri) = &compute.params.control_plane_uri {
|
||||
get_config_from_control_plane(control_plane_uri, &compute.params.compute_id)
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
Err(anyhow::anyhow!("config_path_test_only is not set"))
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
if let Some(spec) = spec {
|
||||
if let Ok(pspec) = ParsedSpec::try_from(spec) {
|
||||
// Parse any received ComputeSpec and transpose the result into a Result<Option<ParsedSpec>>.
|
||||
let parsed_spec_result: Result<Option<ParsedSpec>> =
|
||||
get_config_result.and_then(|config| {
|
||||
if let Some(spec) = config.spec {
|
||||
if let Ok(pspec) = ParsedSpec::try_from(spec) {
|
||||
Ok(Some(pspec))
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
Err(anyhow::anyhow!("could not parse spec"))
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
Ok(None)
|
||||
}
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
let new_status: ComputeStatus;
|
||||
match parsed_spec_result {
|
||||
// Control plane (HCM) returned a spec and we were able to parse it.
|
||||
Ok(Some(pspec)) => {
|
||||
{
|
||||
let mut state = compute.state.lock().unwrap();
|
||||
// Defensive programming to make sure this thread is indeed the only one that can move the compute
|
||||
// node out of the `RefreshConfigurationPending` state. Would be nice if we can encode this invariant
|
||||
// node out of the `RefreshConfiguration` state. Would be nice if we can encode this invariant
|
||||
// into the type system.
|
||||
assert_eq!(state.status, ComputeStatus::RefreshConfigurationPending);
|
||||
assert_eq!(state.status, ComputeStatus::RefreshConfiguration);
|
||||
|
||||
if state.pspec.as_ref().map(|ps| ps.pageserver_connstr.clone())
|
||||
== Some(pspec.pageserver_connstr.clone())
|
||||
@@ -123,20 +143,45 @@ fn configurator_main_loop(compute: &Arc<ComputeNode>) {
|
||||
match compute.reconfigure() {
|
||||
Ok(_) => {
|
||||
info!("Refresh configuration: compute node configured");
|
||||
compute.set_status(ComputeStatus::Running);
|
||||
new_status = ComputeStatus::Running;
|
||||
}
|
||||
Err(e) => {
|
||||
error!(
|
||||
"Refresh configuration: could not configure compute node: {}",
|
||||
e
|
||||
);
|
||||
// Leave the compute node in the `RefreshConfigurationPending` state if the configuration
|
||||
// Set the compute node back to the `RefreshConfigurationPending` state if the configuration
|
||||
// was not successful. It should be okay to treat this situation the same as if the loop
|
||||
// hasn't executed yet as long as the detection side keeps notifying.
|
||||
new_status = ComputeStatus::RefreshConfigurationPending;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
// Control plane (HCM)'s response does not contain a spec. This is the "Empty" attachment case.
|
||||
Ok(None) => {
|
||||
info!(
|
||||
"Compute Manager signaled that this compute is no longer attached to any storage. Exiting."
|
||||
);
|
||||
// We just immediately terminate the whole compute_ctl in this case. It's not necessary to attempt a
|
||||
// clean shutdown as Postgres is probably not responding anyway (which is why we are in this refresh
|
||||
// configuration state).
|
||||
std::process::exit(1);
|
||||
}
|
||||
// Various error cases:
|
||||
// - The request to the control plane (HCM) either failed or returned a malformed spec.
|
||||
// - compute_ctl itself is configured incorrectly (e.g., compute_id is not set).
|
||||
Err(e) => {
|
||||
error!(
|
||||
"Refresh configuration: error getting a parsed spec: {:?}",
|
||||
e
|
||||
);
|
||||
new_status = ComputeStatus::RefreshConfigurationPending;
|
||||
// We may be dealing with an overloaded HCM if we end up in this path. Backoff 5 seconds before
|
||||
// retrying to avoid hammering the HCM.
|
||||
std::thread::sleep(std::time::Duration::from_secs(5));
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
compute.set_status(new_status);
|
||||
} else if state.status == ComputeStatus::Failed {
|
||||
info!("compute node is now in Failed state, exiting");
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user