Remove obsolete ones

- Relation size cache was moved to extension

- the changes in visibilitymap.c and freespace.c became unnecessary
  with v16, thanks to changes in upstream code

- WALProposer was moved to extension

- The hack in ReadBuffer_common to not throw an error on unexpected
  data beyond EOF was removed in v16 rebase. We haven't seen such
  errors, so I guess that was some early issue that was fixed long
  time ago.

- The ginfast.c diff was made unnecessary by upstream commit 56b662523f
This commit is contained in:
Heikki Linnakangas
2024-06-18 13:31:01 +03:00
committed by Heikki Linnakangas
parent 33a09946fc
commit b774ab54d4

View File

@@ -55,50 +55,6 @@ Update from Heikki (2024-04-17): I tried to write an upstream patch for that, to
### Alternatives
Perhaps we could write an extra WAL record with the t_cid information, when a page is evicted that contains rows that were touched a transaction that's still running. However, that seems very complicated.
## ginfast.c
```
diff --git a/src/backend/access/gin/ginfast.c b/src/backend/access/gin/ginfast.c
index e0d9940946..2d964c02e9 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/gin/ginfast.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/gin/ginfast.c
@@ -285,6 +285,17 @@ ginHeapTupleFastInsert(GinState *ginstate, GinTupleCollector *collector)
memset(&sublist, 0, sizeof(GinMetaPageData));
makeSublist(index, collector->tuples, collector->ntuples, &sublist);
+ if (metadata->head != InvalidBlockNumber)
+ {
+ /*
+ * ZENITH: Get buffer before XLogBeginInsert() to avoid recursive call
+ * of XLogBeginInsert(). Reading a new buffer might evict a dirty page from
+ * the buffer cache, and if that page happens to be an FSM or VM page, zenith_write()
+ * will try to WAL-log an image of the page.
+ */
+ buffer = ReadBuffer(index, metadata->tail);
+ }
+
if (needWal)
XLogBeginInsert();
@@ -316,7 +327,6 @@ ginHeapTupleFastInsert(GinState *ginstate, GinTupleCollector *collector)
data.prevTail = metadata->tail;
data.newRightlink = sublist.head;
- buffer = ReadBuffer(index, metadata->tail);
LockBuffer(buffer, GIN_EXCLUSIVE);
page = BufferGetPage(buffer);
```
The problem is explained in the comment above
### How to get rid of the patch
Can we stop WAL-logging FSM or VM pages? Or delay the WAL logging until we're out of the critical
section or something.
Maybe some bigger rewrite of FSM and VM would help to avoid WAL-logging FSM and VM page images?
## Mark index builds that use buffer manager without logging explicitly
```
@@ -160,57 +116,6 @@ The old method is still available, though.
Wait until v15?
## Cache relation sizes
The Neon extension contains a little cache for smgrnblocks() and smgrexists() calls, to avoid going
to the page server every time. It might be useful to cache those in PostgreSQL, maybe in the
relcache? (I think we do cache nblocks in relcache already, check why that's not good enough for
Neon)
## Use buffer manager when extending VM or FSM
```
src/backend/storage/freespace/freespace.c | 14 +-
src/backend/access/heap/visibilitymap.c | 15 +-
diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/visibilitymap.c b/src/backend/access/heap/visibilitymap.c
index e198df65d8..addfe93eac 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/heap/visibilitymap.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/heap/visibilitymap.c
@@ -652,10 +652,19 @@ vm_extend(Relation rel, BlockNumber vm_nblocks)
/* Now extend the file */
while (vm_nblocks_now < vm_nblocks)
{
- PageSetChecksumInplace((Page) pg.data, vm_nblocks_now);
+ /*
+ * ZENITH: Initialize VM pages through buffer cache to prevent loading
+ * them from pageserver.
+ */
+ Buffer buffer = ReadBufferExtended(rel, VISIBILITYMAP_FORKNUM, P_NEW,
+ RBM_ZERO_AND_LOCK, NULL);
+ Page page = BufferGetPage(buffer);
+
+ PageInit((Page) page, BLCKSZ, 0);
+ PageSetChecksumInplace(page, vm_nblocks_now);
+ MarkBufferDirty(buffer);
+ UnlockReleaseBuffer(buffer);
- smgrextend(rel->rd_smgr, VISIBILITYMAP_FORKNUM, vm_nblocks_now,
- pg.data, false);
vm_nblocks_now++;
}
```
### Problem we're trying to solve
???
### How to get rid of the patch
Maybe this would be a reasonable change in PostgreSQL too?
## Allow startup without reading checkpoint record
In Neon, the compute node is stateless. So when we are launching compute node, we need to provide
@@ -270,66 +175,6 @@ would be weird if the sequence moved backwards though, think of PITR.
Or add a GUC for the amount to prefix to PostgreSQL, and force it to 1 in Neon.
## Walproposer
```
src/Makefile | 1 +
src/backend/replication/libpqwalproposer/Makefile | 37 +
src/backend/replication/libpqwalproposer/libpqwalproposer.c | 416 ++++++++++++
src/backend/postmaster/bgworker.c | 4 +
src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c | 6 +
src/backend/replication/Makefile | 4 +-
src/backend/replication/walproposer.c | 2350 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
src/backend/replication/walproposer_utils.c | 402 +++++++++++
src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 7 +
src/backend/replication/walsender.c | 320 ++++++---
src/backend/storage/ipc/ipci.c | 6 +
src/include/replication/walproposer.h | 565 ++++++++++++++++
```
WAL proposer is communicating with safekeeper and ensures WAL durability by quorum writes. It is
currently implemented as patch to standard WAL sender.
### How to get rid of the patch
Refactor into an extension. Submit hooks or APIs into upstream if necessary.
@MMeent did some work on this already: https://github.com/neondatabase/postgres/pull/96
## Ignore unexpected data beyond EOF in bufmgr.c
```
@@ -922,11 +928,14 @@ ReadBuffer_common(SMgrRelation smgr, char relpersistence, ForkNumber forkNum,
*/
bufBlock = isLocalBuf ? LocalBufHdrGetBlock(bufHdr) : BufHdrGetBlock(bufHdr);
if (!PageIsNew((Page) bufBlock))
- ereport(ERROR,
+ {
+ // XXX-ZENITH
+ MemSet((char *) bufBlock, 0, BLCKSZ);
+ ereport(DEBUG1,
(errmsg("unexpected data beyond EOF in block %u of relation %s",
blockNum, relpath(smgr->smgr_rnode, forkNum)),
errhint("This has been seen to occur with buggy kernels; consider updating your system.")));
-
+ }
/*
* We *must* do smgrextend before succeeding, else the page will not
* be reserved by the kernel, and the next P_NEW call will decide to
```
PostgreSQL is a bit sloppy with extending relations. Usually, the relation is extended with zeros
first, then the page is filled, and finally the new page WAL-logged. But if multiple backends extend
a relation at the same time, the pages can be WAL-logged in different order.
I'm not sure what scenario exactly required this change in Neon, though.
### How to get rid of the patch
Submit patches to pgsql-hackers, to tighten up the WAL-logging around relation extension. It's a bit
confusing even in PostgreSQL. Maybe WAL log the intention to extend first, then extend the relation,
and finally WAL-log that the extension succeeded.
## Make smgr interface available to extensions
```