## Problem
In large oltp test run
https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/actions/runs/15905488707/job/44859116742
we see that the `Benchmark database maintenance` step is skipped in all
3 strategy variants, however it should be executed in two.
This is due to treating the `test_maintenance` boolean type in the
strategy in the condition of the `Benchmark database maintenance` step
## Summary of changes
Use a boolean condition instead of a string comparison
## Test run from this pull request branch
https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/actions/runs/15923605412
## Problem
- We run the large tenant oltp workload with a fixed size (larger than
existing customers' workloads).
Our customer's workloads are continuously growing and our testing should
stay ahead of the customers' production workloads.
- we want to touch all tables in the tenant's database (updates) so that
we simulate a continuous change in layer files like in a real production
workload
- our current oltp benchmark uses a mixture of read and write
transactions, however we also want a separate test run with read-only
transactions only
## Summary of changes
- modify the existing workload to have a separate run with pgbench
custom scripts that are read-only
- create a new workload that
- grows all large tables in each run (for the reuse branch in the large
oltp tenant's project)
- updates a percentage of rows in all large tables in each run (to
enforce table bloat and auto-vacuum runs and layer rebuild in
pageservers
Each run of the new workflow increases the logical database size about
16 GB.
We start with 6 runs per day which will give us about 96-100 GB growth
per day.
---------
Co-authored-by: Alexander Lakhin <alexander.lakhin@neon.tech>
## Problem
https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/pull/11210 migrated pushing images
to ghcr. Unfortunately, it was incomplete in using images from ghcr,
which resulted in a few places referencing the ghcr build-tools image,
while trying to use docker hub credentials.
## Summary of changes
Use build-tools image from ghcr consistently.
... to better match the workload characteristics of real Neon customers
## Problem
We analyzed workloads of large Neon users and want to extend the oltp
workload to include characteristics seen in those workloads.
## Summary of changes
- for re-use branch delete inserted rows from last run
- adjust expected run-time (time-outs) in GitHub workflow
- add queries that exposes the prefetch getpages path
- add I/U/D transactions for another table (so far the workload was
insert/append-only)
- add an explicit vacuum analyze step and measure its time
- add reindex concurrently step and measure its time (and take care that
this step succeeds even if prior reindex runs have failed or were
canceled)
- create a second connection string for the pooled connection that
removes the `-pooler` suffix from the hostname because we want to run
long-running statements (database maintenance) and bypass the pooler
which doesn't support unlimited statement timeout
## Test run
https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/actions/runs/13851772887/job/38760172415
## Problem
We want to support larger tenants (regarding logical database size,
number of transactions per second etc.) and should increase our test
coverage of OLTP transactions at larger scale.
## Summary of changes
Start a new benchmark that over time will add more OLTP tests at larger
scale.
This PR covers the first version and will be extended in further PRs.
Also fix some infrastructure:
- default for new connections and large tenants is to use connection
pooler pgbouncer, however our fixture always added
`statement_timeout=120` which is not compatible with pooler
[see](https://neon.tech/docs/connect/connection-errors#unsupported-startup-parameter)
- action to create branch timed out after 10 seconds and 10 retries but
for large tenants it can take longer so use increasing back-off for
retries
## Test run
https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/actions/runs/13593446706
