Remote storage cleanup split from #5198:
- pageserver, extensions, and safekeepers now have their separate remote
storage
- RemoteStorageKind has the configuration code
- S3Storage has the cleanup code
- with MOCK_S3, pageserver, extensions, safekeepers use different
buckets
- with LOCAL_FS, `repo_dir / "local_fs_remote_storage" / $user` is used
as path, where $user is `pageserver`, `safekeeper`
- no more `NeonEnvBuilder.enable_xxx_remote_storage` but one
`enable_{pageserver,extensions,safekeeper}_remote_storage`
Should not have any real changes. These will allow us to default to
`LOCAL_FS` for pageserver on the next PR, remove
`RemoteStorageKind.NOOP`, work towards #5172.
Co-authored-by: Alexander Bayandin <alexander@neon.tech>
## Problem
Tests using remote storage have manually entered `test_name` parameters,
which:
- Are easy to accidentally duplicate when copying code to make a new
test
- Omit parameters, so don't actually create unique S3 buckets when
running many tests concurrently.
## Summary of changes
- Use the `request` fixture in neon_env_builder fixture to get the test
name, then munge that into an S3 compatible bucket name.
- Remove the explicit `test_name` parameters to enable_remote_storage
I made a mistake when I adding `env.initial_timeline:
Optional[TimelineId]` in the #3839, should had just generated it and
used it to create a specific timeline. This PR fixes those mistakes, and
some extra calling into psql which must be slower than python field
access.
## Problem
neon_fixtures.py has grown to unmanageable size. It attracts conflicts.
When adding specific utils under for example `fixtures/pageserver`
things sometimes need to import stuff from `neon_fixtures.py` which
creates circular import. This is usually only needed for type
annotations, so `typing.TYPE_CHECKING` flag can mask the issue.
Nevertheless I believe that splitting neon_fixtures.py into smaller
parts is a better approach.
Currently the PR contains small things, but I plan to continue and move
NeonEnv to its own `fixtures.env` module. To keep the diff small I think
this PR can already be merged to cause less conflicts.
UPD: it looks like currently its not really possible to fully avoid
usage of `typing.TYPE_CHECKING`, because some components directly depend
on each other. I e Env -> Cli -> Env cycle. But its still worth it to
avoid it in as many places as possible. And decreasing neon_fixture's
size still makes sense.
This patch adds a regression test for the threshold-based layer
eviction.
The test asserts the basic invariant that, if left alone, the residence
statuses will stabilize, with some layers resident and some layers
evicted.
Thereby, we cover both the aspect of last-access-time-threshold-based
eviction, and the "imitate access" hacks that we put in recently.
The aggressive `period` and `threshold` values revealed a subtle bug
which is also fixed in this patch.
The symptom was that, without the Rust changes of this patch, there
would be occasional test failures due to `WARN... unexpectedly
downloading` log messages.
These log messages were caused by the "imitate access" calls of the
eviction task.
But, the whole point of the "imitate access" hack was to prevent
eviction of the layers that we access there.
After some digging, I found the root cause, which is the following race
condition:
1. Compact: Write out an L1 layer from several L0 layers. This records
residence event `LayerCreate` with the current timestamp.
2. Eviction: imitate access logical size calculation. This accesses the
L0 layers because the L1 layer is not yet in the layer map.
3. Compact: Grab layer map lock, add the new L1 to layer map and remove
the L0s, release layer map lock.
4. Eviction: observes the new L1 layer whose only activity timestamp is
the `LayerCreate` event.
The L1 layer had no chance of being accessed until after (3).
So, if enough time passes between (1) and (3), then (4) will observe a
layer with `now-last_activity > threshold` and evict it
The fix is to require the first `record_residence_event` to happen while
we already hold the layer map lock.
The API requires a ref to a `BatchedUpdates` as a witness that we are
inside a layer map lock.
That is not fool-proof, e.g., new call sites for `insert_historic` could
just completely forget to record the residence event.
It would be nice to prevent this at the type level.
In the meantime, we have a rate-limited log messages to warn us, if such
an implementation error sneaks in in the future.
fixes https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/3593
fixes https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/3942
---------
Co-authored-by: Joonas Koivunen <joonas@neon.tech>
