## Problem
In 89275f6c1e we fixed an issue, when we were dropping db in Postgres
even though cplane request failed. Yet, it introduced a new problem that
we now de-register db in cplane even if we didn't actually drop it in
Postgres.
## Summary of changes
Here we revert extension change, so we now again may leave db in invalid
state after failed drop. Instead, `compute_ctl` is now responsible for
cleaning up invalid databases during full configuration. Thus, there are
two ways of recovering from failed DROP DATABASE:
1. User can just repeat DROP DATABASE, same as in Vanilla Postgres.
2. If they didn't, then on next full configuration (dbs / roles changes
in the API; password reset; or data availability check) invalid db
will be cleaned up in the Postgres and re-created by `compute_ctl`. So
again it follows pretty much the same semantics as Vanilla Postgres --
you need to drop it again after failed drop.
That way, we have a recovery trajectory for both problems.
See this commit for info about `invalid` db state:
a4b4cc1d60
According to it:
> An invalid database cannot be connected to anymore, but can still be
dropped.
While on it, this commit also fixes another issue, when `compute_ctl`
was trying to connect to databases with `ALLOW CONNECTIONS false`. Now
it will just skip them.
Fixes#5435
## Problem
If the control plane happened to respond to a DROP DATABASE request with
a non-200 response, we'd abort the DROP DATABASE transaction in the
usual spot. However, Postgres for some reason actually performs the drop
inside of `standard_ProcessUtility`. As such, the database was left in a
weird state after aborting the transaction. We had test coverage of a
failed CREATE DATABASE but not a failed DROP DATABASE.
## Summary of changes
Since DROP DATABASE can't be inside of a transaction block, we can just
forward the DDL changes to the control plane inside of
`ProcessUtility_hook`, and if we respond with 500 bail out of
`ProcessUtility` before we perform the drop. This change also adds a
test, which reproduced the invalid database issue before the fix was
applied.
Refactor tests to have less globals.
This will allow to hopefully write more complex tests for our new metric
collection requirements in #5297. Includes reverted work from #4761
related to test globals.
Co-authored-by: Alexander Bayandin <alexander@neon.tech>
Co-authored-by: MMeent <matthias@neon.tech>
## Problem
Test `test_metric_collection` become flaky:
```
AssertionError: assert not ['2023-05-25T14:03:41.644042Z ERROR metrics_collection: failed to send metrics: reqwest::Error { kind: Request, url: Url { scheme: "http", cannot_be_a_base: false, username: "", password: None, host: Some(Domain("localhost")), port: Some(18022), path: "/billing/api/v1/usage_events", query: None, fragment: None }, source: hyper::Error(Connect, ConnectError("tcp connect error", Os { code: 99, kind: AddrNotAvailable, message: "Cannot assign requested address" })) }',
...]
```
I suspect it is caused by having 2 places when we define
`httpserver_listen_address` fixture (which is internally used by
`pytest-httpserver` plugin)
## Summary of changes
- Remove the definition of `httpserver_listen_address` from
`test_runner/regress/test_ddl_forwarding.py` and keep one in
`test_runner/fixtures/neon_fixtures.py`
- Also remote unused `httpserver_listen_address` parameter from
`test_proxy_metric_collection`
## Describe your changes
## Issue ticket number and link
## Checklist before requesting a review
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code.
- [x] If it is a core feature, I have added thorough tests.
- [ ] Do we need to implement analytics? if so did you add the relevant
metrics to the dashboard?
- [ ] If this PR requires public announcement, mark it with
/release-notes label and add several sentences in this section.
