The control plane currently only supports EdDSA. We need to either teach
the storage to use EdDSA, or the control plane to use RSA. EdDSA is more
modern, so let's use that.
We could support both, but it would require a little more code and tests,
and we don't really need the flexibility since we control both sides.
Previously, we only accepted RS256. Seems like a pointless limitation,
and when I was testing it with RS512 tokens, it took me a while to
understand why it wasn't working.
* Fix https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/1854
* Never log Safekeeper::conninfo in walproposer as it now contains a secret token
* control_panel, test_runner: generate and pass JWT tokens for Safekeeper to compute and pageserver
* Compute: load JWT token for Safekepeer from the environment variable. Do not reuse the token from
pageserver_connstring because it's embedded in there weirdly.
* Pageserver: load JWT token for Safekeeper from the environment variable.
* Rewrite docs/authentication.md
There will be different scopes for those two, so authorization code should be different.
The `check_permission` function is now not in the shared library. Its implementation
is very similar to the one which will be added for Safekeeper. In fact, we may reuse
the same existing root-like 'PageServerApi' scope, but I would prefer to have separate
root-like scopes for services.
Also, generate_management_token in tests is generate_pageserver_token now.
