## Problem
`ShardStripeSize` will be used in the compute spec and internally in the
communicator. It shouldn't require pulling in all of `pageserver_api`.
## Summary of changes
Move `ShardStripeSize` into `utils::shard`, along with other basic shard
types. Also remove the `Default` implementation, to discourage clients
from falling back to a default (it's generally a footgun).
The type is still re-exported from `pageserver_api::shard`, along with
all the other shard types.
The 1.88.0 stable release is near (this Thursday). We'd like to fix most
warnings beforehand so that the compiler upgrade doesn't require
approval from too many teams.
This is therefore a preparation PR (like similar PRs before it).
There is a lot of changes for this release, mostly because the
`uninlined_format_args` lint has been added to the `style` lint group.
One can read more about the lint
[here](https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/#/uninlined_format_args).
The PR is the result of `cargo +beta clippy --fix` and `cargo fmt`. One
remaining warning is left for the proxy team.
---------
Co-authored-by: Conrad Ludgate <conrad@neon.tech>
## Problem
The scheduler uses total shards per AZ to select the AZ for newly
created or attached tenants.
This makes bad decisions when we have different node counts per AZ -- we
might have 2 very busy pageservers in one AZ, and 4 more lightly loaded
pageservers in other AZs, and the scheduler picks the busy pageservers
because the total shard count in their AZ is lower.
## Summary of changes
- Divide the shard count by the number of nodes in the AZ when scoring
in `get_az_for_new_tenant`
---------
Co-authored-by: John Spray <john.spray@databricks.com>
## Problem
Pageservers now expose a gRPC API on a separate address and port. This
must be registered with the storage controller such that it can be
plumbed through to the compute via cplane.
Touches #11926.
## Summary of changes
This patch registers the gRPC address and port with the storage
controller:
* Add gRPC address to `nodes` database table and `NodePersistence`, with
a Diesel migration.
* Add gRPC address in `NodeMetadata`, `NodeRegisterRequest`,
`NodeDescribeResponse`, and `TenantLocateResponseShard`.
* Add gRPC address flags to `storcon_cli node-register`.
These changes are backwards-compatible, since all structs will ignore
unknown fields during deserialization.
We keep the practice of keeping the compiler up to date, pointing to the
latest release. This is done by many other projects in the Rust
ecosystem as well.
The 1.87.0 release marks 10 years of Rust.
[Announcement blog
post](https://blog.rust-lang.org/2025/05/15/Rust-1.87.0/)
Prior update was in #11431
## Problem
`home_shard_count` is not updated on the preferred AZ change.
Closes: https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/10493
## Summary of changes
- Update scheduler stats (node ref counts) on preferred AZ change.
Updates storage components to edition 2024. We like to stay on the
latest edition if possible. There is no functional changes, however some
code changes had to be done to accommodate the edition's breaking
changes.
The PR has two commits:
* the first commit updates storage crates to edition 2024 and appeases
`cargo clippy` by changing code. i have accidentially ran the formatter
on some files that had other edits.
* the second commit performs a `cargo fmt`
I would recommend a closer review of the first commit and a less close
review of the second one (as it just runs `cargo fmt`).
part of https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/10918
## Problem
Storage controller uses unsecure http for pageserver API.
Closes: https://github.com/neondatabase/cloud/issues/23734
Closes: https://github.com/neondatabase/cloud/issues/24091
## Summary of changes
- Add an optional `listen_https_port` field to storage controller's Node
state and its API (RegisterNode/ListNodes/etc).
- Allow updating `listen_https_port` on node registration to gradually
add https port for all nodes.
- Add `use_https_pageserver_api` CLI option to storage controller to
enable https.
- Pageserver doesn't support https for now and always reports
`https_port=None`. This will be addressed in follow-up PR.
Avoids compiling the crate and its dependencies into binaries that don't
need them. Shrinks the compute_ctl binary from about 31MB to 28MB in the
release-line-debug-size-lto profile.
## Problem
I noticed when onboarding lots of tenants that the AZ scheduling
violation stat was climbing, before falling later as optimisations
happened. This was happening because we first add the tenant with
PlacementPolicy::Secondary, and then later go to
PlacementPolicy::Attached, and the scheduler's behavior led to a bad AZ
choice:
1. Create a secondary location in the non-preferred AZ
2. Upgrade to Attached where we promote that non-preferred-AZ location
to attached and then create another secondary
3. Optimiser later realises we're in the wrong AZ and moves us
## Summary of changes
- Extend some logging to give more information about AZs
- When scheduling secondary location in PlacementPolicy::Secondary,
select it as if we were attached: in this mode, our business goal is to
have a warm pageserver location that we can make available as attached
quickly if needed, therefore we want it to be in the preferred AZ.
- Make optimize_secondary logic the same, so that it will consider a
secondary location in the preferred AZ to be optimal when in
PlacementPolicy::Secondary
- When transitioning to from PlacementPolicy::Attached(N) to
PlacementPolicy::Secondary, instead of arbitrarily picking a location to
keep, prefer to keep the location in the preferred AZ
## Problem
Since https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/pull/9916, the preferred AZ
of a tenant is much more impactful, and we would like to make it more
visible in tooling.
## Summary of changes
- Include AZ in node describe API
- Include AZ info in node & tenant outputs in CLI
- Add metrics for per-node shard counts, labelled by AZ
- Add a CLI for setting preferred AZ on a tenant
- Extend AZ-setting API+CLI to handle None for clearing preferred AZ
## Problem
We want to do a more robust job of scheduling tenants into their home
AZ: https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/8264.
Closes: https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/8969
## Summary of changes
### Scope
This PR combines prioritizing AZ with a larger rework of how we do
optimisation. The rationale is that just bumping AZ in the order of
Score attributes is a very tiny change: the interesting part is lining
up all the optimisation logic to respect this properly, which means
rewriting it to use the same scores as the scheduler, rather than the
fragile hand-crafted logic that we had before. Separating these changes
out is possible, but would involve doing two rounds of test updates
instead of one.
### Scheduling optimisation
`TenantShard`'s `optimize_attachment` and `optimize_secondary` methods
now both use the scheduler to pick a new "favourite" location. Then
there is some refined logic for whether + how to migrate to it:
- To decide if a new location is sufficiently "better", we generate
scores using some projected ScheduleContexts that exclude the shard
under consideration, so that we avoid migrating from a node with
AffinityScore(2) to a node with AffinityScore(1), only to migrate back
later.
- Score types get a `for_optimization` method so that when we compare
scores, we will only do an optimisation if the scores differ by their
highest-ranking attributes, not just because one pageserver is lower in
utilization. Eventually we _will_ want a mode that does this, but doing
it here would make scheduling logic unstable and harder to test, and to
do this correctly one needs to know the size of the tenant that one is
migrating.
- When we find a new attached location that we would like to move to, we
will create a new secondary location there, even if we already had one
on some other node. This handles the case where we have a home AZ A, and
want to migrate the attachment between pageservers in that AZ while
retaining a secondary location in some other AZ as well.
- A unit test is added for
https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/8969, which is implicitly
fixed by reworking optimisation to use the same scheduling scores as
scheduling.
## Problem
When we update our scheduler/optimization code to respect AZs properly
(https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/pull/9916), the choice of AZ
becomes a much higher-stakes decision. We will pretty much always run a
tenant in its preferred AZ, and that AZ is fixed for the lifetime of the
tenant (unless a human intervenes)
Eventually, when we do auto-balancing based on utilization, I anticipate
that part of that will be to automatically change the AZ of tenants if
our original scheduling decisions have caused imbalance, but as an
interim measure, we can at least avoid making this scheduling decision
based purely on which AZ contains the emptiest node.
This is a precursor to https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/pull/9947
## Summary of changes
- When creating a tenant, instead of scheduling a shard and then reading
its preferred AZ back, make the AZ decision first.
- Instead of choosing AZ based on which node is emptiest, use the median
utilization of nodes in each AZ to pick the AZ to use. This avoids bad
AZ decisions during periods when some node has very low utilization
(such as after replacing a dead node)
I considered also making the selection a weighted pseudo-random choice
based on utilization, but wanted to avoid destabilising tests with that
for now.
## Problem
When picking locations for a shard, we should use a ScheduleContext that
includes all the other shards in the tenant, so that we apply proper
anti-affinity between shards. If we don't do this, then it can lead to
unstable scheduling, where we place a shard somewhere that the optimizer
will then immediately move it away from.
We didn't always do this, because it was a bit awkward to accumulate the
context for a tenant rather than just walking tenants.
This was a TODO in `handle_node_availability_transition`:
```
// TODO: populate a ScheduleContext including all shards in the same tenant_id (only matters
// for tenants without secondary locations: if they have a secondary location, then this
// schedule() call is just promoting an existing secondary)
```
This is a precursor to https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/8264,
where the current imperfect scheduling during node evacuation hampers
testing.
## Summary of changes
- Add an iterator type that yields each shard along with a
schedulecontext that includes all the other shards from the same tenant
- Use the iterator to replace hand-crafted logic in optimize_all_plan
(functionally identical)
- Use the iterator in `handle_node_availability_transition` to apply
proper anti-affinity during node evacuation.
## Problem
Storage controller didn't previously consider AZ locality between
compute and pageservers
when scheduling nodes. Control plane has this feature, and, since we are
migrating tenants
away from it, we need feature parity to avoid perf degradations.
## Summary of changes
The change itself is fairly simple:
1. Thread az info into the scheduler
2. Add an extra member to the scheduling scores
Step (2) deserves some more discussion. Let's break it down by the shard
type being scheduled:
**Attached Shards**
We wish for attached shards of a tenant to end up in the preferred AZ of
the tenant since that
is where the compute is like to be.
The AZ member for `NodeAttachmentSchedulingScore` has been placed
below the affinity score (so it's got the second biggest weight for
picking the node). The rationale for going
below the affinity score is to avoid having all shards of a single
tenant placed on the same node in 2 node
regions, since that would mean that one tenant can drive the general
workload of an entire pageserver.
I'm not 100% sure this is the right decision, so open to discussing
hoisting the AZ up to first place.
**Secondary Shards**
We wish for secondary shards of a tenant to be scheduled in a different
AZ from the preferred one
for HA purposes.
The AZ member for `NodeSecondarySchedulingScore` has been placed first,
so nodes in different AZs
from the preferred one will always be considered first. On small
clusters, this can mean that all the secondaries
of a tenant are scheduled to the same pageserver, but secondaries don't
use up as many resources as the
attached location, so IMO the argument made for attached shards doesn't
hold.
Related: https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/8848
## Problem
Scheduling on tenant creation uses different heuristics compared to the
scheduling done during
background optimizations. This results in scenarios where shards are
created and then immediately
migrated by the optimizer.
## Summary of changes
1. Make scheduler aware of the type of the shard it is scheduling
(attached vs secondary).
We wish to have different heuristics.
2. For attached shards, include the attached shard count from the
context in the node score
calculation. This brings initial shard scheduling in line with what the
optimization passes do.
3. Add a test for (2).
This looks like a bigger change than required, but the refactoring
serves as the basis for az-aware
shard scheduling where we also need to make the distinction between
attached and secondary shards.
Closes https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/8969
## Problem
https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/pull/8852 introduced a new nullable
column for the `nodes` table: `availability_zone_id`
## Summary of changes
* Make neon local and the test suite always provide an az id
* Make the az id field in the ps registration request mandatory
* Migrate the column to non-nullable and adjust in memory state
accordingly
* Remove the code that was used to populate the az id for pre-existing
nodes
## Problem
In order to build AZ aware scheduling, the storage controller needs to
know what AZ pageservers are in.
Related https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/8848
## Summary of changes
This patch set adds a new nullable column to the `nodes` table:
`availability_zone_id`. The node registration
request is extended to include the AZ id (pageservers already have this
in their `metadata.json` file).
If the node is already registered, then we update the persistent and
in-memory state with the provided AZ.
Otherwise, we add the node with the AZ to begin with.
A couple assumptions are made here:
1. Pageserver AZ ids are stable
2. AZ ids do not change over time
Once all pageservers have a configured AZ, we can remove the optionals
in the code and make the database column not nullable.
## Problem
Previously, the controller only used the shard counts for scheduling.
This works well when hosting only many-sharded tenants, but works much
less well when hosting single-sharded tenants that have a greater
deviation in size-per-shard.
Closes: https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/7798
## Summary of changes
- Instead of UtilizationScore, carry the full PageserverUtilization
through into the Scheduler.
- Use the PageserverUtilization::score() instead of shard count when
ordering nodes in scheduling.
Q: Why did test_sharding_split_smoke need updating in this PR?
A: There's an interesting side effect during shard splits: because we do
not decrement the shard count in the utilization when we de-schedule the
shards from before the split, the controller will now prefer to pick
_different_ nodes for shards compared with which ones held secondaries
before the split. We could use our knowledge of splitting to fix up the
utilizations more actively in this situation, but I'm leaning toward
leaving the code simpler, as in practical systems the impact of one
shard on the utilization of a node should be fairly low (single digit
%).
## Problem
When creating a new shard the storage controller schedules via
Scheduler::schedule_shard. This does not take into account the number of
attached shards. What it does take into account is the node affinity:
when a shard is scheduled, all its nodes (primaries and secondaries) get
their affinity incremented.
For two node clusters and shards with one secondary we have a
pathological case where all primaries are scheduled on the same node.
Now that we track the count of attached shards per node, this is trivial
to fix. Still, the "proper" fix is to use the pageserver's utilization
score.
Closes https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/8041
## Summary of changes
Use attached shard count when deciding which node to schedule a fresh
shard on.
## Problem
Pageserver restarts cause read availablity downtime for tenants. See
`Motivation` section in the
[RFC](https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/pull/7704).
## Summary of changes
* Introduce a new `NodeSchedulingPolicy`: `PauseForRestart`
* Implement the first take of drain and fill algorithms
* Add a node status endpoint which can be polled to figure out when an
operation is done
The implementation follows the RFC, so it might be useful to peek at it
as you're reviewing.
Since the PR is rather chunky, I've made sure all commits build (with
warnings), so you can
review by commit if you prefer that.
RFC: https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/pull/7704
Related https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/7387
## Problem
The storage controller does not track the number of shards attached to a
given pageserver. This is a requirement for various scheduling
operations (e.g. draining and filling will use this to figure out if the
cluster is balanced)
## Summary of Changes
Track the number of shards attached to each node.
Related https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/7387
## Problem
- https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/7355
The optimize_secondary function calls schedule_shard to check for
improvements, but if there are exactly the same number of nodes as there
are replicas of the shard, it emits some scary looking logs about no
nodes being elegible.
Closes https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/7355
## Summary of changes
- Add a mode to SchedulingContext that controls logging: this should be
useful in future any time we add a log to the scheduling path, to avoid
it becoming a source of spam when the scheduler is called during
optimization.
The binary etc were renamed some time ago, but the path in the source
tree remained "attachment_service" to avoid disruption to ongoing PRs.
There aren't any big PRs out right now, so it's a good time to cut over.
- Rename `attachment_service` to `storage_controller`
- Move it to the top level for symmetry with `storage_broker` & to avoid
mixing the non-prod neon_local stuff (`control_plane/`) with the storage
controller which is a production component.
