Which is mainly generational state (terms) and useful LSNs.
Also add /status basic healthcheck request which is now used in tests to
determine the safekeeper is up; this fixes#726.
ref #115
* Use logging in python tests
* Use f-strings for logs
* Don't log test output while running
* Use only pytest logging handler
* Add more info about pytest logging
* Rename wal_acceptor binary to safekeeper
* Rename wal_acceptor.pid and wal_acceptor.log to safekeeper.pid and safekeeper.log
* Change some mentions of WAL acceptor to safekeeper
* Dockerfile: alias wal_acceptor to safekeeper temporarily until internal scripts are updated
- perform checkpoint for each tenant repository.
- wait for the completion of all threads.
Add new option 'immediate' to 'pageserver stop' command to terminate the pageserver immediately.
* `wal_acceptor`: add HTTP handler, /metrics endpoint only, no authentication
* Two gauges are currently reported: `flush_lsn` and `commit_lsn`
* Add `DEFAULT_PG_LISTEN_PORT` and `DEFAULT_PG_LISTEN_PORT` consts for uniformity
* Send ProposerGreeting manually in tests
* Move test_sync_safekeepers to test_wal_acceptor.py
* Capture test_sync_safekeepers output
* Add comment for handle_json_ctrl
* Save captured output in CI
New command has been added to append specially crafted records in safekeeper WAL. This command takes json for append, encodes LogicalMessage based on json fields, and processes new AppendRequest to append and commit WAL in safekeeper.
Python test starts up walkeepers and creates config for walproposer, then appends WAL and checks --sync-safekeepers works without errors. This test is simplest one, more useful test cases (like in #545) for different setups will be added soon.
In this test safekeepers are restarted one by one, while bank transactions
are executed and validated in the background. Bank transactions consist of
balance transfers and log writes. In the end balance sum should remain the
same and there should be progress from every client, when 2 of 3 safekeeper
nodes are up.
It's not interesting for most tests, and clutters the output. If there
are individual tests where it is worthwhole, let's add pg_controldata calls
to those tests, but I don't think it's needed for now.
Support is done via pytest-xdist plugin.
To use the feature add -n<concurrency> to pytest invocation
e.g. pytest -n8 to run 8 tests in parallel.
Changes in code are mostly about ports assigning. Previously port for
pageserver was hardcoded without the ability to override through zenith
cli and ports for started compute nodes were calculated twice, in zenith
cli and in test code. Now zenith cli supports port arguments for
pageserver and compute nodes to be passed explicitly.
Tests are modified in such a way that each worker gets a non overlapping
port range which can be configured and now contains 100 ports. These
ports are distributed to test services (pageserver, wal acceptors,
compute nodes) so they can work independently.
In order to exclude problems with synchronizing disk and memory logical
size is not stored in metadata on disk. It is calculated on timeline
"start" by scanning the contents of layered repo and then size is maintained
via an atomic variable.
This patch also adds new endpoint to pageserver http api: branch detail.
It allows retrieval of a particular branch info by its name. Size info
is also added to the response of the endpoint and used in tests.
Compare files in existing compute node's pgdata with fresh basebackup at the same lsn. We expect that content is identical, except tmp files
Use it after some tests.
Change control plane code to call `postgres --sync-safekeepers` before
compute node start when safekeepers are enabled. Now `pg create` will
create an empty data directory with the proper config file. Subsequent
`pg start` will run `sync-safekeepers` and will call basebackup with
the resulting LSN. Also change few tests to accommodate this new behavior.
Now that the page server collects this metric (since commit 212920e47e),
let's include it in the performance test results
The new metric looks like this:
performance/test_perf_pgbench.py . [100%]
--------------- Benchmark results ----------------
test_pgbench.init: 6.784 s
test_pgbench.pageserver_writes: 466 MB <---- THIS IS NEW
test_pgbench.5000_xacts: 8.196 s
test_pgbench.size: 163 MB
=============== 1 passed in 21.00s ===============
Make this test look like 'test_compute_restart.sh' by @ololobus, which
was surprisingly good for checking safekeepers behavior. This test adds
an intermediate compute node start with bulk select that causes a lot of
FPI's and select itself wouldn't wait for all that WAL to be replicated.
So if we kill compute node right after that we end up with lagging safekeepers
with VCL != flush_lsn. And starting new node from that state takes special
care.
Also, run and print `pg_controldata` output after each compute node start
to eyeball lsn/checkpoint info of basebackup.
This commit only adds test without fixing the problem.
This provides a pytest fixture to record metrics from pytest tests. The
The recorded metrics are printed out at the end of the tests.
As a starter, this includes on small test, using pgbench. It prints out
three metrics: the initialization time, runtime of 5000 xacts, and the
repository size after the tests.
Change CLI so that we always create node from scratch at 'pg start'.
This operation preserve previously existing config
Add new flag '--config-only' to 'pg create'.
If this flag is passed, don't perform basebackup, just fill initial postgresql.conf for the node.
Current state with authentication.
Page server validates JWT token passed as a password during connection
phase and later when performing an action such as create branch tenant
parameter of an operation is validated to match one submitted in token.
To allow access from console there is dedicated scope: PageServerApi,
this scope allows access to all tenants. See code for access validation in:
PageServerHandler::check_permission.
Because we are in progress of refactoring of communication layer
involving wal proposer protocol, and safekeeper<->pageserver. Safekeeper
now doesn’t check token passed from compute, and uses “hardcoded” token
passed via environment variable to communicate with pageserver.
Compute postgres now takes token from environment variable and passes it
as a password field in pageserver connection. It is not passed through
settings because then user will be able to retrieve it using pg_settings
or SHOW ..
I’ve added basic test in test_auth.py. Probably after we add
authentication to remaining network paths we should enable it by default
and switch all existing tests to use it.
this patch adds support for tenants. This touches mostly pageserver.
Directory layout on disk is changed to contain new layer of indirection.
Now path to particular repository has the following structure: <pageserver workdir>/tenants/<tenant
id>. Tenant id has the same format as timeline id. Tenant id is included in
pageserver commands when needed. Also new commands are available in
pageserver: tenant_list, tenant_create. This is also reflected CLI.
During init default tenant is created and it's id is saved in CLI config,
so following commands can use it without extra options. Tenant id is also included in
compute postgres configuration, so it can be passed via ServerInfo to
safekeeper and in connection string to pageserver.
For more info see docs/multitenancy.md.
This patch aims to:
* Unify connection & querying logic of ZenithPagerserver and Postgres.
* Mitigate changes to transaction machinery introduced in `psycopg2 >= 2.9`.
Now it's possible to acquire db connection using the corresponding
method:
```python
pg = postgres.create_start('main')
conn = pg.connect()
...
conn.close()
```
This pattern can be further improved with the help of `closing`:
```python
from contextlib import closing
pg = postgres.create_start('main')
with closing(pg.connect()) as conn:
...
```
All connections produced by this method will have autocommit
enabled by default.
It's not realistic to enable full-blown type checks
within test_runner's codebase, since the amount of
warnings revealed by mypy is overwhelming.
Tests are supposed to be easy to use, so we can't
cripple everybody's workflow for the sake of imaginary benefit.
Ultimately, the purpose of this attempt is three-fold:
* Facilitate code navigation when paired with python-language-server.
* Make method signatures apparent to a fellow programmer.
* Occasionally catch some obvious type errors.
