## Problem
`TYPE_CHECKING` is used inconsistently across Python tests.
## Summary of changes
- Update `ruff`: 0.7.0 -> 0.11.2
- Enable TC (flake8-type-checking):
https://docs.astral.sh/ruff/rules/#flake8-type-checking-tc
- (auto)fix all new issues
## Problem
Cplane and storage controller tenant config changes are not additive.
Any change overrides all existing tenant configs. This would be fine if
both did client side patching, but that's not the case.
Once this merges, we must update cplane to use the PATCH endpoint.
## Summary of changes
### High Level
Allow for patching of tenant configuration with a `PATCH
/v1/tenant/config` endpoint.
It takes the same data as it's PUT counterpart. For example the payload
below will update `gc_period` and unset `compaction_period`. All other
fields are left in their original state.
```
{
"tenant_id": "1234",
"gc_period": "10s",
"compaction_period": null
}
```
### Low Level
* PS and storcon gain `PATCH /v1/tenant/config` endpoints. PS endpoint
is only used for cplane managed instances.
* `storcon_cli` is updated to have separate commands for
`set-tenant-config` and `patch-tenant-config`
Related https://github.com/neondatabase/cloud/issues/21043
Problem
-------
Tests that directly call the Pageserver Management API to set tenant
config are flaky if the Pageserver is managed by Storcon because Storcon
is the source of truth and may (theoretically) reconcile a tenant at any
time.
Solution
--------
Switch all users of
`set_tenant_config`/`patch_tenant_config_client_side`
to use the `env.storage_controller.pageserver_api()`
Future Work
-----------
Prevent regressions from creeping in.
And generally clean up up tenant configuration.
Maybe we can avoid the Pageserver having a default tenant config at all
and put the default into Storcon instead?
* => https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/9621
Refs
----
fixes https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/9522
In #7927 I needed to fix this test case, but the fixes should be
possible to land irrespective of the layer ingestion code change.
The most important fix is the behavior if an image layer is found: the
assertion message formatting raises a runtime error, which obscures the
fact that we found an image layer.
fixes https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/7790 (duplicating most
of the issue description here for posterity)
# Background
From the time before always-authoritative `index_part.json`, we had to
handle duplicate layers. See the RFC for an illustration of how
duplicate layers could happen:
a8e6d259cb/docs/rfcs/027-crash-consistent-layer-map-through-index-part.md (L41-L50)
As of #5198 , we should not be exposed to that problem anymore.
# Problem 1
We still have
1. [code in
Pageserver](82960b2175/pageserver/src/tenant/timeline.rs (L4502-L4521))
than handles duplicate layers
2. [tests in the test
suite](d9dcbffac3/test_runner/regress/test_duplicate_layers.py (L15))
that demonstrates the problem using a failpoint
However, the test in the test suite doesn't use the failpoint to induce
a crash that could legitimately happen in production.
What is does instead is to return early with an `Ok()`, so that the code
in Pageserver that handles duplicate layers (item 1) actually gets
exercised.
That "return early" would be a bug in the routine if it happened in
production.
So, the tests in the test suite are tests for their own sake, but don't
serve to actually regress-test any production behavior.
# Problem 2
Further, if production code _did_ (it nowawdays doesn't!) create a
duplicate layer, the code in Pageserver that handles the condition (item
1 above) is too little and too late:
* the code handles it by discarding the newer `struct Layer`; that's
good.
* however, on disk, we have already overwritten the old with the new
layer file
* the fact that we do it atomically doesn't matter because ...
* if the new layer file is not bit-identical, then we have a cache
coherency problem
* PS PageCache block cache: caches old bit battern
* blob_io offsets stored in variables, based on pre-overwrite bit
pattern / offsets
* => reading based on these offsets from the new file might yield
different data than before
# Solution
- Remove the test suite code pertaining to Problem 1
- Move & rename test suite code that actually tests RFC-27
crash-consistent layer map.
- Remove the Pageserver code that handles duplicate layers too late
(Problem 1)
- Use `RENAME_NOREPLACE` to prevent over-rename the file during
`.finish()`, bail with an error if it happens (Problem 2)
- This bailing prevents the caller from even trying to insert into the
layer map, as they don't even get a `struct Layer` at hand.
- Add `abort`s in the place where we have the layer map lock and check
for duplicates (Problem 2)
- Note again, we can't reach there because we bail from `.finish()` much
earlier in the code.
- Share the logic to clean up after failed `.finish()` between image
layers and delta layers (drive-by cleanup)
- This exposed that test `image_layer_rewrite` was overwriting layer
files in place. Fix the test.
# Future Work
This PR adds a new failure scenario that was previously "papered over"
by the overwriting of layers:
1. Start a compaction that will produce 3 layers: A, B, C
2. Layer A is `finish()`ed successfully.
3. Layer B fails mid-way at some `put_value()`.
4. Compaction bails out, sleeps 20s.
5. Some disk space gets freed in the meantime.
6. Compaction wakes from sleep, another iteration starts, it attempts to
write Layer A again. But the `.finish()` **fails because A already
exists on disk**.
The failure in step 5 is new with this PR, and it **causes the
compaction to get stuck**.
Before, it would silently overwrite the file and "successfully" complete
the second iteration.
The mitigation for this is to `/reset` the tenant.
