Commit Graph

9 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Vlad Lazar
868f194a3b pageserver: remove handling of vanilla protocol (#12126)
## Problem

We support two ingest protocols on the pageserver: vanilla and
interpreted.
Interpreted has been the only protocol in use for a long time.

## Summary of changes

* Remove the ingest handling of the vanilla protocol
* Remove tenant and pageserver configuration for it
* Update all tests that tweaked the ingest protocol

## Compatibility

Backward compatibility:
* The new pageserver version can read the existing pageserver
configuration and it will ignore the unknown field.
* When the tenant config is read from the storcon db or from the
pageserver disk, the extra field will be ignored.

Forward compatiblity:
* Both the pageserver config and the tenant config map missing fields to
their default value.

I'm not aware of any tenant level override that was made for this knob.
2025-06-05 11:43:04 +00:00
Vlad Lazar
9e0148de11 safekeeper: use protobuf for sending compressed records to pageserver (#9821)
## Problem

https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/pull/9746 lifted decoding and
interpretation of WAL to the safekeeper.
This reduced the ingested amount on the pageservers by around 10x for a
tenant with 8 shards, but doubled
the ingested amount for single sharded tenants.

Also, https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/pull/9746 uses bincode which
doesn't support schema evolution.
Technically the schema can be evolved, but it's very cumbersome.

## Summary of changes

This patch set addresses both problems by adding protobuf support for
the interpreted wal records and adding compression support. Compressed
protobuf reduced the ingested amount by 100x on the 32 shards
`test_sharded_ingest` case (compared to non-interpreted proto). For the
1 shard case the reduction is 5x.

Sister change to `rust-postgres` is
[here](https://github.com/neondatabase/rust-postgres/pull/33).

## Links

Related: https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/9336
Epic: https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/9329
2024-11-27 12:12:21 +00:00
Vlad Lazar
7a2f0ed8d4 safekeeper: lift decoding and interpretation of WAL to the safekeeper (#9746)
## Problem

For any given tenant shard, pageservers receive all of the tenant's WAL
from the safekeeper.
This soft-blocks us from using larger shard counts due to bandwidth
concerns and CPU overhead of filtering
out the records.

## Summary of changes

This PR lifts the decoding and interpretation of WAL from the pageserver
into the safekeeper.

A customised PG replication protocol is used where instead of sending
raw WAL, the safekeeper sends
filtered, interpreted records. The receiver drives the protocol
selection, so, on the pageserver side, usage
of the new protocol is gated by a new pageserver config:
`wal_receiver_protocol`.

 More granularly the changes are:
1. Optionally inject the protocol and shard identity into the arguments
used for starting replication
2. On the safekeeper side, implement a new wal sending primitive which
decodes and interprets records
 before sending them over
3. On the pageserver side, implement the ingestion of this new
replication message type. It's very similar
 to what we already have for raw wal (minus decoding and interpreting).
 
 ## Notes
 
* This PR currently uses my [branch of
rust-postgres](https://github.com/neondatabase/rust-postgres/tree/vlad/interpreted-wal-record-replication-support)
which includes the deserialization logic for the new replication message
type. PR for that is open
[here](https://github.com/neondatabase/rust-postgres/pull/32).
* This PR contains changes for both pageservers and safekeepers. It's
safe to merge because the new protocol is disabled by default on the
pageserver side. We can gradually start enabling it in subsequent
releases.
* CI tests are running on https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/pull/9747
 
 ## Links
 
 Related: https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/9336
 Epic: https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/9329
2024-11-25 17:29:28 +00:00
Tristan Partin
5bd8e2363a Enable all pyupgrade checks in ruff
This will help to keep us from using deprecated Python features going
forward.

Signed-off-by: Tristan Partin <tristan@neon.tech>
2024-10-08 14:32:26 -05:00
Heikki Linnakangas
723c0971e8 Don't create 'empty' branch in neon_simple_env (#8965)
Now that we've given up hope on sharing the neon_simple_env between
tests, there's no reason to not use the 'main' branch directly.
2024-09-09 12:38:34 +03:00
Heikki Linnakangas
da626fb1fa tests: Remove "postgres is running on ... branch" messages
It seems like useless chatter. The endpoint.start() itself prints a
"Running command ... neon_local endpoint start" message too.
2024-02-11 01:34:31 +02:00
Alek Westover
119b86480f test: make pg_regress less flaky, hopefully (#4903)
`pg_regress` is flaky: https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/559

Consolidated `CHECKPOINT` to `check_restored_datadir_content`, add a
wait for `wait_for_last_flush_lsn`.

Some recently introduced flakyness was fixed with #4948.

---------

Co-authored-by: Joonas Koivunen <joonas@neon.tech>
2023-08-10 15:24:43 +03:00
Heikki Linnakangas
53f438a8a8 Rename "Postgres nodes" in control_plane to endpoints.
We use the term "endpoint" in for compute Postgres nodes in the web UI
and user-facing documentation now. Adjust the nomenclature in the code.

This changes the name of the "neon_local pg" command to "neon_local
endpoint". Also adjust names of classes, variables etc. in the python
tests accordingly.

This also changes the directory structure so that endpoints are now
stored in:

    .neon/endpoints/<endpoint id>

instead of:

    .neon/pgdatadirs/tenants/<tenant_id>/<endpoint (node) name>

The tenant ID is no longer part of the path. That means that you
cannot have two endpoints with the same name/ID in two different
tenants anymore. That's consistent with how we treat endpoints in the
real control plane and proxy: the endpoint ID must be globally unique.
2023-04-13 14:34:29 +03:00
Heikki Linnakangas
3aca717f3d Reorganize python tests.
Merge batch_others and batch_pg_regress. The original idea was to
split all the python tests into multiple "batches" and run each batch
in parallel as a separate CI job. However, the batch_pg_regress batch
was pretty short compared to all the tests in batch_others. We could
split batch_others into multiple batches, but it actually seems better
to just treat them as one big pool of tests and use pytest's handle
the parallelism on its own. If we need to split them across multiple
nodes in the future, we could use pytest-shard or something else,
instead of managing the batches ourselves.

Merge test_neon_regress.py, test_pg_regress.py and test_isolation.py
into one file, test_pg_regress.py. Seems more clear to group all
pg_regress-based tests into one file, now that they would all be in
the same directory.
2022-08-30 18:25:38 +03:00