Analysis of the LR benchmarking tests indicates that in the duration of
test_subscriber_lag, a leftover 'slotter' replication slot can lead to
retained WAL growing on the publisher. This replication slot is not used
by any subscriber. The only purpose of the slot is to generate snapshot
files for the puspose of test_snap_files.
Signed-off-by: Tristan Partin <tristan@neon.tech>
psycopg2 has the following warning related to autocommit:
> By default, any query execution, including a simple SELECT will start
> a transaction: for long-running programs, if no further action is
> taken, the session will remain “idle in transaction”, an undesirable
> condition for several reasons (locks are held by the session, tables
> bloat…). For long lived scripts, either ensure to terminate a
> transaction as soon as possible or use an autocommit connection.
In the 2.9 release notes, psycopg2 also made the following change:
> `with connection` starts a transaction on autocommit transactions too
Some of these connections are indeed long-lived, so we were retaining
tons of WAL on the endpoints because we had a transaction pinned in the
past.
Link: https://www.psycopg.org/docs/news.html#what-s-new-in-psycopg-2-9
Link: https://github.com/psycopg/psycopg2/issues/941
Signed-off-by: Tristan Partin <tristan@neon.tech>
## Problem
Running `pytest.skip(...)` in a test body instead of marking the test
with `@pytest.mark.skipif(...)` makes all fixtures to be initialised,
which is not necessary if the test is going to be skipped anyway.
Also, some tests are unnecessarily skipped (e.g. `test_layer_bloating`
on Postgres 17, or `test_idle_reconnections` at all) or run (e.g.
`test_parse_project_git_version_output_positive` more than on once
configuration) according to comments.
## Summary of changes
- Move `skip_on_postgres` / `xfail_on_postgres` /
`run_only_on_default_postgres` decorators to `fixture.utils`
- Add new `skip_in_debug_build` and `skip_on_ci` decorators
- Replace `pytest.skip(...)` calls with decorators where possible
Adds a Python benchmark for sharded ingestion. This ingests 7 GB of WAL
(100M rows) into a Safekeeper and fans out to 10 shards running on 10
different pageservers. The ingest volume and duration is recorded.
## Problem
Part of https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/8623
## Summary of changes
Removed all aux-v1 config processing code. Note that we persisted it
into the index part file, so we cannot really remove the field from
index part. I also kept the config item within the tenant config, but we
will not read it any more.
---------
Signed-off-by: Alex Chi Z <chi@neon.tech>
## Problem
We were seeing timeouts on migrations in this test.
The test unfortunately tends to saturate local storage, which is shared
between the pageservers and the control plane database, which makes the
test kind of unrealistic. We will also want to increase the scale of
this test, so it's worth fixing that.
## Summary of changes
- Instead of randomly creating timelines at the same time as the other
background operations, explicitly identify a subset of tenant which will
have timelines, and create them at the start. This avoids pageservers
putting a lot of load on the test node during the main body of the test.
- Adjust the tenants created to create some number of 8 shard tenants
and the rest 1 shard tenants, instead of just creating a lot of 2 shard
tenants.
- Use archival_config to exercise tenant-mutating operations, instead of
using timeline creation for this.
- Adjust reconcile_until_idle calls to avoid waiting 5 seconds between
calls, which causes timelines with large shard count tenants.
- Fix a pageserver bug where calls to archival_config during activation
get 404
## Problem
The path to TPC-H queries was incorrectly changed in #9306.
This path is used for `test_tpch` parameterization, so all perf tests
started to fail:
```
==================================== ERRORS ====================================
__________ ERROR collecting test_runner/performance/test_perf_olap.py __________
test_runner/performance/test_perf_olap.py:205: in <module>
@pytest.mark.parametrize("query", tpch_queuies())
test_runner/performance/test_perf_olap.py:196: in tpch_queuies
assert queries_dir.exists(), f"TPC-H queries dir not found: {queries_dir}"
E AssertionError: TPC-H queries dir not found: /__w/neon/neon/test_runner/performance/performance/tpc-h/queries
E assert False
E + where False = <bound method Path.exists of PosixPath('/__w/neon/neon/test_runner/performance/performance/tpc-h/queries')>()
E + where <bound method Path.exists of PosixPath('/__w/neon/neon/test_runner/performance/performance/tpc-h/queries')> = PosixPath('/__w/neon/neon/test_runner/performance/performance/tpc-h/queries').exists
```
## Summary of changes
- Fix the path to tpc-h queries
It didn't serve much value, and was only used twice.
Path(__file__).parent is a pretty easy invocation to use.
Signed-off-by: Tristan Partin <tristan@neon.tech>
Add wrappers for a few commands that didn't have them before. Move the
logic to generate tenant and timeline IDs from NeonCli to the callers,
so that NeonCli is more purely just a type-safe wrapper around
'neon_local'.
This should generally be faster when running tests, especially those
that run with higher scales.
Ignoring test_lfc_resize since it seems like we are hitting a query
timeout for some reason that I have yet to investigate. A little bit of
improvemnt is better than none.
Signed-off-by: Tristan Partin <tristan@neon.tech>
After #8655, we needed to mark some tests to shut down immediately. To
aid these tests, try the new pattern of `flush_ep_to_pageserver`
followed by a non-compacting checkpoint. This moves the general graceful
shutdown problem of having too much to flush at shutdown into the test.
Also, add logging for how long the graceful shutdown took, if we got to
complete it for faster log eyeballing.
Fixes: #8712
Cc: #8715, #8708
## Problem
The default Postgres version is set to 15 in code, while we use 16 in
most of the other places (and Postgres 17 is coming)
## Summary of changes
- Run `benchmarks` job with Postgres 16 (instead of Postgres 14)
- Set `DEFAULT_PG_VERSION` to 16 in all places
- Remove deprecated `--pg-version` pytest argument
- Update `test_metadata_bincode_serde_ensure_roundtrip` for Postgres 16
## Problem
Current superuser check always passes because it returns a tuple like
`(False,)`, and then the `if not superuser` passes.
## Summary of changes
Fixes the issue by unwrapping the tuple. Verified that it works against
a project where I don't have superuser.
It seems that some benchmarks are failing because they are simply not
stopping to ingest wal on shutdown. It might mean that the tests were
never ran on a stable pageserver situation and WAL has always been left
to be ingested on safekeepers, but let's see if this silences the
failures and "stops the bleeding".
Cc: https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/8712
## Problem
Pageserver exposes some vectored get related configs which are not in
use.
## Summary of changes
Remove the following pageserver configs: get_impl, get_vectored_impl,
and `validate_get_vectored`.
They are not used in the pageserver since
https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/pull/8601.
Manual overrides have been removed from the aws repo in
https://github.com/neondatabase/aws/pull/1664.
## Problem
This test was disabled.
## Summary of changes
- Remove the skip marker.
- Explicitly avoid doing compaction & gc during checkpoints (the default
scale doesn't do anything here, but when experimeting with larger scales
it messes things up)
- Set a data size that gives a ~20s runtime on a Hetzner dev machine,
previous one gave very noisy results because it was so small
For reference on a Hetzner AX102:
```
------------------------------ Benchmark results -------------------------------
test_bulk_insert[neon-release-pg16].insert: 25.664 s
test_bulk_insert[neon-release-pg16].pageserver_writes: 5,428 MB
test_bulk_insert[neon-release-pg16].peak_mem: 577 MB
test_bulk_insert[neon-release-pg16].size: 0 MB
test_bulk_insert[neon-release-pg16].data_uploaded: 1,922 MB
test_bulk_insert[neon-release-pg16].num_files_uploaded: 8
test_bulk_insert[neon-release-pg16].wal_written: 1,382 MB
test_bulk_insert[neon-release-pg16].wal_recovery: 25.373 s
test_bulk_insert[neon-release-pg16].compaction: 0.035 s
```
## Problem
Migrations of tenant shards with cold secondaries are holding up drains
in during production deployments.
## Summary of changes
If a secondary locations is lagging by more than 256MiB (configurable,
but that's the default), then skip cutting it over to the secondary as part of the node drain.
## Problem
The controller scale test does random migrations. These mutate secondary
locations, and therefore can cause secondary optimizations to happen in
the background, violating the test's expectation that consistency_check
will work as there are no reconciliations running.
Example:
https://neon-github-public-dev.s3.amazonaws.com/reports/main/10247161379/index.html#suites/07874de07c4a1c9effe0d92da7755ebf/6316beacd3fb3060/
## Summary of changes
- Only migrate to existing secondary locations, not randomly picked
nodes, so that we can do a fast reconcile_until_idle (otherwise
reconcile_until_idle is takes a long time to create new secondary
locations).
- Do a reconcile_until_idle before consistency_check.
## Problem
> Currently, long-running LR tests recreate endpoints every night. We'd
like to have along-running buildup of history to exercise the pageserver
in this case (instead of "unit-testing" the same behavior everynight).
Closes#8317
## Summary of changes
- Update Postgres version for replication tests
- Set `BENCHMARK_PROJECT_ID_PUB`/`BENCHMARK_PROJECT_ID_SUB` env vars to
projects that were created for this purpose
---------
Co-authored-by: Sasha Krassovsky <krassovskysasha@gmail.com>
## Problem
Re-attach blocks the pageserver http server from starting up. Hence, it
can't reply to heartbeats
until that's done. This makes the storage controller mark the node
off-line (not good). We worked
around this by setting the interval after which nodes are marked offline
to 5 minutes. This isn't a
long term solution.
## Summary of changes
* Introduce a new `NodeAvailability` state: `WarmingUp`. This state
models the following time interval:
* From receiving the re-attach request until the pageserver replies to
the first heartbeat post re-attach
* The heartbeat delta generator becomes aware of this state and uses a
separate longer interval
* Flag `max-warming-up-interval` now models the longer timeout and
`max-offline-interval` the shorter one to
match the names of the states
Closes https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/7552
## Problem
In `test_basebackup_with_high_slru_count`, the pageserver is sometimes
mysteriously hanging on startup, having been started+stopped earlier in
the test setup while populating template tenant data.
- #7586
We can't see why this is hanging in this particular test. The test does
some weird stuff though, like attaching a load of broken tenants and
then doing a SIGQUIT kill of a pageserver.
## Summary of changes
- Attach tenants normally instead of doing a failpoint dance to attach
them as broken
- Shut the pageserver down gracefully during init instead of using
immediate mode
- Remove the "sequential" variant of the unstable test, as this is going
away soon anyway
- Log before trying to acquire lock file, so that if it hangs we have a
clearer sense of if that's really where it's hanging. It seems like it
is, but that code does a non-blocking flock so it's surprising.
When `NeonEnv.from_repo_dir` was introduced, storage controller stored
its
state exclusively `attachments.json`.
Since then, it has moved to using Postgres, which stores its state in
`storage_controller_db`.
But `NeonEnv.from_repo_dir` wasn't adjusted to do this.
This PR rectifies the situation.
Context for this is failures in
`test_pageserver_characterize_throughput_with_n_tenants`
CF:
https://neondb.slack.com/archives/C033RQ5SPDH/p1721035799502239?thread_ts=1720901332.293769&cid=C033RQ5SPDH
Notably, `from_repo_dir` is also used by the backwards- and
forwards-compatibility.
Thus, the changes in this PR affect those tests as well.
However, it turns out that the compatibility snapshot already contains
the `storage_controller_db`.
Thus, it should just work and in fact we can remove hacks like
`fixup_storage_controller`.
Follow-ups created as part of this work:
* https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/8399
* https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/8400
This test reproduces the case of a writer creating a deep stack of L0
layers. It uses realistic layer sizes and writes several gigabytes of
data, therefore runs as a performance test although it is validating
memory footprint rather than performance per se.
It acts a regression test for two recent fixes:
- https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/pull/8401
- https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/pull/8391
In future it will demonstrate the larger improvement of using a k-merge
iterator for L0 compaction (#8184)
This test can be extended to enforce limits on the memory consumption of
other housekeeping steps, by restarting the pageserver and then running
other things to do the same "how much did RSS increase" measurement.
These tests will help verify that replication, both physical and
logical, works as expected in Neon.
Co-authored-by: Sasha Krassovsky <sasha@neon.tech>
## Problem
When generations were new, these messages were an important way of
noticing if something unexpected was going on. We found some real issues
when investigating tests that unexpectedly tripped them.
At time has gone on, this code is now pretty battle-tested, and as we do
more live migrations etc, it's fairly normal to see the occasional
message from a node with a stale generation.
At this point the cognitive load on developers to selectively allow-list
these logs outweighs the benefit of having them at warn severity.
Closes: https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/8080
## Summary of changes
- Downgrade "Dropped remote consistent LSN updates" and "Dropping stale
deletions" messages to INFO
- Remove all the allow-list entries for these logs.
we want to run some specific pagebench test cases on dedicated hardware
to get reproducible results
run1: 1 client per tenant => characterize throughput with n tenants.
- 500 tenants
- scale 13 (200 MB database)
- 1 hour duration
- ca 380 GB layer snapshot files
run2.singleclient: 1 client per tenant => characterize latencies
run2.manyclient: N clients per tenant => characterize throughput
scalability within one tenant.
- 1 tenant with 1 client for latencies
- 1 tenant with 64 clients because typically for a high number of
connections we recommend the connection pooler
which by default uses 64 connections (for scalability)
- scale 136 (2048 MB database)
- 20 minutes each
Adds manual compaction trigger; add gc compaction to test_gc_feedback
Part of https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/8002
```
test_gc_feedback[debug-pg15].logical_size: 50 Mb
test_gc_feedback[debug-pg15].physical_size: 2269 Mb
test_gc_feedback[debug-pg15].physical/logical ratio: 44.5302
test_gc_feedback[debug-pg15].max_total_num_of_deltas: 7
test_gc_feedback[debug-pg15].max_num_of_deltas_above_image: 2
test_gc_feedback[debug-pg15].logical_size_after_bottom_most_compaction: 50 Mb
test_gc_feedback[debug-pg15].physical_size_after_bottom_most_compaction: 287 Mb
test_gc_feedback[debug-pg15].physical/logical ratio after bottom_most_compaction: 5.6312
test_gc_feedback[debug-pg15].max_total_num_of_deltas_after_bottom_most_compaction: 4
test_gc_feedback[debug-pg15].max_num_of_deltas_above_image_after_bottom_most_compaction: 1
```
## Summary of changes
* Add the manual compaction trigger
* Use in test_gc_feedback
* Add a guard to avoid running it with retain_lsns
* Fix: Do `schedule_compaction_update` after compaction
* Fix: Supply deltas in the correct order to reconstruct value
---------
Signed-off-by: Alex Chi Z <chi@neon.tech>
## Problem
- `test_storage_controller_many_tenants` can fail with warnings in the
storage controller about tenant creation holding a lock for too long,
because this test stresses the machine running the test with many
concurrent timeline creations
- `test_tenant_delete_smoke` can fail when synthetic remote storage
errors show up
## Summary of changes
- tolerate warnings about slow timeline creation in
test_storage_controller_many_tenants
- tolerate both possible errors during error_tolerant_delete
In #7957 we enabled deletion without attachment, but retained the
old-style deletion (return 202, delete in background) for attached
tenants. In this PR, we remove the old-style deletion path, such that if
the tenant delete API is invoked while a tenant is detached, it is
simply detached before completing the deletion.
This intentionally doesn't rip out all the old deletion code: in case a
deletion was in progress at time of upgrade, we keep around the code for
finishing it for one release cycle. The rest of the code removal happens
in https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/pull/8091
Now that deletion will always be via the new path, the new path is also
updated to use some retries around remote storage operations, to
tripping up the control plane with 500s if S3 has an intermittent issue.
## Problem
see https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/8070
## Summary of changes
the neon_local subcommands to
- start neon
- start pageserver
- start safekeeper
- start storage controller
get a new option -t=xx or --start-timeout=xx which allows to specify a
longer timeout in seconds we wait for the process start.
This is useful in test cases where the pageserver has to read a lot of
layer data, like in pagebench test cases.
In addition we exploit the new timeout option in the python test
infrastructure (python fixtures) and modify the flaky testcase to
increase the timeout from 10 seconds to 1 minute.
Example from the test execution
```bash
RUST_BACKTRACE=1 NEON_ENV_BUILDER_USE_OVERLAYFS_FOR_SNAPSHOTS=1 DEFAULT_PG_VERSION=15 BUILD_TYPE=release ./scripts/pytest test_runner/performance/pageserver/pagebench/test_pageserver_max_throughput_getpage_at_latest_lsn.py
...
2024-06-19 09:29:34.590 INFO [neon_fixtures.py:1513] Running command "/instance_store/neon/target/release/neon_local storage_controller start --start-timeout=60s"
2024-06-19 09:29:36.365 INFO [broker.py:34] starting storage_broker to listen incoming connections at "127.0.0.1:15001"
2024-06-19 09:29:36.365 INFO [neon_fixtures.py:1513] Running command "/instance_store/neon/target/release/neon_local pageserver start --id=1 --start-timeout=60s"
2024-06-19 09:29:36.366 INFO [neon_fixtures.py:1513] Running command "/instance_store/neon/target/release/neon_local safekeeper start 1 --start-timeout=60s"
```
## Problem
`test_pageserver_max_throughput_getpage_at_latest_lsn` is a pagebench
testcase which creates several tenants/timelines to verify pageserver
performance.
The test swaps environments around in the tenant duplication stage, so
the storage controller uses two separate db instances (one in the
duplication stage and another one in the benchmarking stage).
In the benchmarking stage, the storage controller starts without any
knowledge of nodes, but with knowledge of tenants (via
attachments.json). When we re-attach and attempt to update the scheduler
stats, the scheduler rightfully complains
about the node not being known. The setup should preserve the storage
controller across the two envs, but i think it's fine to just allow list
the error in this case.
## Summary of changes
add the error message
`2024-06-19T09:38:27.866085Z ERROR Scheduler missing node 1``
to the list of allowed errors for storage_controller
## Problem
halfvec data type was introduced in pgvector 0.7.0 and is popular
because
it allows smaller vectors, smaller indexes and potentially better
performance.
So far we have not tested halfvec in our periodic performance tests.
This PR adds halfvec indexing and halfvec queries to the test.
## Problem
Testcase page bench test_pageserver_max_throughput_getpage_at_latest_lsn
had been deactivated because it was flaky.
We now ignore copy fail error messages like in
270d3be507/test_runner/regress/test_pageserver_getpage_throttle.py (L17-L20)
and want to reactivate it to see it it is still flaky
## Summary of changes
- reactivate the test in CI
- ignore CopyFail error message during page bench test cases
## Checklist before requesting a review
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code.
- [ ] If it is a core feature, I have added thorough tests.
- [ ] Do we need to implement analytics? if so did you add the relevant
metrics to the dashboard?
- [ ] If this PR requires public announcement, mark it with
/release-notes label and add several sentences in this section.
## Checklist before merging
- [ ] Do not forget to reformat commit message to not include the above
checklist
A simple API to collect some statistics after compaction to easily
understand the result.
The tool reads the layer map, and analyze range by range instead of
doing single-key operations, which is more efficient than doing a
benchmark to collect the result. It currently computes two key metrics:
* Latest data access efficiency, which finds how many delta layers /
image layers the system needs to iterate before returning any key in a
key range.
* (Approximate) PiTR efficiency, as in
https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/7770, which is simply the
number of delta files in the range. The reason behind that is, assume no
image layer is created, PiTR efficiency is simply the cost of collect
records from the delta layers, and the replay time. Number of delta
files (or in the future, estimated size of reads) is a simple yet
efficient way of estimating how much effort the page server needs to
reconstruct a page.
Signed-off-by: Alex Chi Z <chi@neon.tech>
