Motivation
==========
It's the only user, and the name of `_for_write` is wrong as of
commit 7a63685cde
Author: Christian Schwarz <christian@neon.tech>
Date: Fri Aug 18 19:31:03 2023 +0200
simplify page-caching of EphemeralFile (#4994)
Notes
=====
This also allows us to get rid of the WriteBufResult type.
Also rename `search_mapping_for_write` to `search_mapping_exact`.
It makes more sense that way because there is `_for_write`-locking
anymore.
## Problem
These changes are part of building seamless tenant migration, as
described in the RFC:
- https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/pull/5029
## Summary of changes
- A new configuration type `LocationConf` supersedes `TenantConfOpt` for
storing a tenant's configuration in the pageserver repo dir. It contains
`TenantConfOpt`, as well as a new `mode` attribute that describes what
kind of location this is (secondary, attached, attachment mode etc). It
is written to a file called `config-v1` instead of `config` -- this
prepares us for neatly making any other profound changes to the format
of the file in future. Forward compat for existing pageserver code is
achieved by writing out both old and new style files. Backward compat is
achieved by checking for the old-style file if the new one isn't found.
- The `TenantMap` type changes, to hold `TenantSlot` instead of just
`Tenant`. The `Tenant` type continues to be used for attached tenants
only. Tenants in other states (such as secondaries) are represented by a
different variant of `TenantSlot`.
- Where `Tenant` & `Timeline` used to hold an Arc<Mutex<TenantConfOpt>>,
they now hold a reference to a AttachedTenantConf, which includes the
extra information from LocationConf. This enables them to know the
current attachment mode.
- The attachment mode is used as an advisory input to decide whether to
do compaction and GC (AttachedStale is meant to avoid doing uploads,
AttachedMulti is meant to avoid doing deletions).
- A new HTTP API is added at `PUT /tenants/<tenant_id>/location_config`
to drive new location configuration. This provides a superset of the
functionality of attach/detach/load/ignore:
- Attaching a tenant is just configuring it in an attached state
- Detaching a tenant is configuring it to a detached state
- Loading a tenant is just the same as attaching it
- Ignoring a tenant is the same as configuring it into Secondary with
warm=false (i.e. retain the files on disk but do nothing else).
Caveats:
- AttachedMulti tenants don't do compaction in this PR, but they do in
the follow on #5397
- Concurrent updates to the `location_config` API are not handled
elegantly in this PR, a better mechanism is added in the follow on
https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/pull/5367
- Secondary mode is just a placeholder in this PR: the code to upload
heatmaps and do downloads on secondary locations will be added in a
later PR (but that shouldn't change any external interfaces)
Closes: https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/5379
---------
Co-authored-by: Christian Schwarz <christian@neon.tech>
## Problem
In #5383 this configuration was added, but it missed the parts of the
Builder class that let it actually be used.
## Summary of changes
Add `control_plane_api_token` hooks to PageserverConfigBuilder
We overwrite L1 layers if compaction gets interrupted. We did not have a
test showing that we do in fact do this.
The test might be a bit flaky due to timestamp usage, but separating for
smaller diff in as part of #5172.
Also removes an unrelated 200s pgbench from the test suite.
Fixes#4689 by replacing all of `std::Path` , `std::PathBuf` with
`camino::Utf8Path`, `camino::Utf8PathBuf` in
- pageserver
- safekeeper
- control_plane
- libs/remote_storage
Co-authored-by: Joonas Koivunen <joonas@neon.tech>
We currently lose the actual reason the first walredo attempt failed.
Together with implicit retry making it difficult to eyeball what is
happening.
PR version keeps the logging the same error message twice, which is what
we've been doing all along. However correlating the retrying case and
the finally returned error is difficult, because the actual error
message was left out before this PR.
Lastly, log the final error we present to postgres *in the same span*,
not outside it. Additionally, suppress the stacktrace as the comment
suggested.
We have rare walredo failures with pg16.
Let's introduce recording of failing walredo input in `#[cfg(feature =
"testing")]`. There is additional logging (the value reconstruction path
logging usually shown with not found keys), keeping it for
`#[cfg(features = "testing")]`.
Cc: #5404.
## Problem
Duplication of error in log
Fixes#5366
## Summary of changes
Removed `{0}` from error description above each enum due to presence of
`#[source]` to avoid duplication
Signed-off-by: Rahul Modpur <rmodpur2@gmail.com>
## Problem
The 500 status code should only be used for bugs or unrecoverable
failures: situations we did not expect. Currently, the pageserver is
misusing this response code for some situations that are totally normal,
like requests targeting tenants that are in the process of activating.
The 503 response is a convenient catch-all for "I can't right now, but I
will be able to".
## Summary of changes
- Change some transient availability error conditions to return 503
instead of 500
- Update the HTTP client configuration in integration tests to retry on
503
After these changes, things like creating a tenant and then trying to
create a timeline within it will no longer require carefully checking
its status first, or retrying on 500s. Instead, a client which is
properly configured to retry on 503 can quietly handle such situations.
It is wasteful to cycle through the page cache slots trying to find a
victim slot if all the slots are currently un-evictable because a read /
write guard is alive.
We suspect this wasteful cycling to be the root cause for an
"indigestion" we observed in staging (#5291).
The hypothesis is that we `.await` after we get ahold of a read / write
guard, and that tokio actually deschedules us in favor of another
future.
If that other future then needs a page slot, it can't get ours because
we're holding the guard.
Repeat this, and eventually, the other future(s) will find themselves
doing `find_victim` until they hit `exceeded evict iter limit`.
The `find_victim` is wasteful and CPU-starves the futures that are
already holding the read/write guard. A `yield` inside `find_victim`
could mitigate the starvation, but wouldn't fix the wasting of CPU
cycles.
So instead, this PR queues waiters behind a tokio semaphore that counts
evictable slots.
The downside is that this stops the clock page replacement if we have 0
evictable slots.
Also, as explained by the big block comment in `find_victims`, the
semaphore doesn't fully prevent starvation because because we can't make
tokio prioritize those tasks executing `find_victim` that have been
trying the longest.
Implementation
===============
We need to acquire the semaphore permit before locking the slot.
Otherwise, we could deadlock / discover that all permits are gone and
would have to relinquish the slot, having moved forward the Clock LRU
without making progress.
The downside is that, we never get full throughput for read-heavy
workloads, because, until the reader coalesces onto an existing permit,
it'll hold its own permit.
Addendum To Root-Cause Analysis In #5291
========================================
Since merging that PR, @arpad-m pointed out that we couldn't have
reached the `slot.write().await` with his patches because the
VirtualFile slots can't have all been write-locked, because we only hold
them locked while the IO is ongoing, and the IO is still done with
synchronous system calls in that patch set, so, we can have had at most
$number_of_executor_threads locked at any given time.
I count 3 tokio runtimes that do `Timeline::get`, each with 8 executor
threads in our deployment => $number_of_executor_threads = 3*8 = 24 .
But the virtual file cache has 100 slots.
We both agree that nothing changed about the core hypothesis, i.e.,
additional await points inside VirtualFile caused higher concurrency
resulting in exhaustion of page cache slots.
But we'll need to reproduce the issue and investigate further to truly
understand the root cause, or find out that & why we were indeed using
100 VirtualFile slots.
TODO: could it be compaction that needs to hold guards of many
VirtualFile's in its iterators?
## Problem
Because `neon_local` by default runs with no remote storage, it was not
running the deletion queue workers, and the attempt to call into
`recover()` was failing.
This is a bogus configuration that will go away when we make remote
storage mandatory.
## Summary of changes
Don't try and do deletion queue recovery when remote storage is
disabled.
The reason we don't just unset `control_plane_api` to avoid this is that
generations will soon become mandatory, irrespective of when we make
remote storage mandatory.
Part of #5172. Builds upon #5243, #5298. Includes the test changes:
- no more RemoteStorageKind.NOOP
- no more testing of pageserver without remote storage
- benchmarks now use LOCAL_FS as well
Support for running without RemoteStorage is still kept but in practice,
there are no tests and should not be any tests.
Co-authored-by: Christian Schwarz <christian@neon.tech>
## Problem
Control plane API calls in prod will need authentication.
## Summary of changes
`control_plane_api_token` config is loaded and set as HTTP
`Authorization` header.
Closes: https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/5139
## Problem
Pageservers must not delete objects or advertise updates to
remote_consistent_lsn without checking that they hold the latest
generation for the tenant in question (see [the RFC](
https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/blob/main/docs/rfcs/025-generation-numbers.md))
In this PR:
- A new "deletion queue" subsystem is introduced, through which
deletions flow
- `RemoteTimelineClient` is modified to send deletions through the
deletion queue:
- For GC & compaction, deletions flow through the full generation
verifying process
- For timeline deletions, deletions take a fast path that bypasses
generation verification
- The `last_uploaded_consistent_lsn` value in `UploadQueue` is replaced
with a mechanism that maintains a "projected" lsn (equivalent to the
previous property), and a "visible" LSN (which is the one that we may
share with safekeepers).
- Until `control_plane_api` is set, all deletions skip generation
validation
- Tests are introduced for the new functionality in
`test_pageserver_generations.py`
Once this lands, if a pageserver is configured with the
`control_plane_api` configuration added in
https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/pull/5163, it becomes safe to
attach a tenant to multiple pageservers concurrently.
---------
Co-authored-by: Joonas Koivunen <joonas@neon.tech>
Co-authored-by: Christian Schwarz <christian@neon.tech>
The TaskKind dimension added in #5339 is insufficient to understand what
kind of data causes the cache hits.
Regarding performance considerations: I'm not too worried because we're
moving from 3 to 4 one-byte sized fields; likely the space now used by
the new field was padding before. Didn't check this, though, and it
doesn't matter, we need the data.
What I don't like about this PR is that we have an `Unknown` content
type, and I also don't like that there's no compile-time way to assert
that it's set to something != `Unknown` when calling the page cache.
But, this is what I could come up with before tomorrow’s release, and I
think it covers the hot paths.
Should have added them in the initial PR #5186.
Would have been nice to test the failure cases as well, but, without
mocking the FS, that's too hard / platform-dependent.
This PR adds a `task_kind` label to page cache access metrics.
These are to validate our hypothesis that the high hit page cache rate
we observe in prod is due to internal tasks, not getpage requests from
compute.
We believe the latter should near-always be a pageserver-page-cache
_miss_ because compute has it's own page cache, and hence there is no
locality of reference for its accesses to pageserver page cache.
Before this PR, we didn't have `RequestContext` propagation to any code
below the on-demand downloader.
The vast majority of changes in this PR is concerned with adding that
propagation.
Split off from #5297. Builds upon #5326. Handles original review
comments which I did not move to earlier split PRs. Completes test
support for verifying events by notifying of the last batch of events.
Adds cleaning up of tempfiles left because of an unlucky shutdown or
SIGKILL.
Finally closes#5175.
Co-authored-by: Arpad Müller <arpad-m@users.noreply.github.com>
Write collected metrics to disk to recover previously sent metrics on
restart.
Recover the previously collected metrics during startup, send them over
at right time
- send cached synthetic size before actual is calculated
- when `last_record_lsn` rolls back on startup
- stay at last sent `written_size` metric
- send `written_size_delta_bytes` metric as 0
Add test support: stateful verification of events in python tests.
Fixes: #5206
Cc: #5175 (loggings, will be enhanced in follow-up)
Split off from #5297.
There should be no functional changes here:
- refactor tenant metric "production" like previously timeline, allows
unit testing, though not interesting enough yet to test
- introduce type aliases for tuples
- extra refactoring for `collect`, was initially thinking it was useful
but will do a inline later
- shorter binding names
- support for future allocation reuse quests with IdempotencyKey
- move code out of tokio::select to make it rustfmt-able
- generification, allow later replacement of `&'static str` with enum
- add tests that assert sent event contents exactly
## Problem
VM should be updated if XLH_LOCK_ALL_FROZEN_CLEARED flags is set in
XLOG_HEAP_LOCK,XLOG_HEAP_2_LOCK_UPDATED WAL records
## Summary of changes
Add handling of this records in walingest.rs
## Checklist before requesting a review
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code.
- [ ] If it is a core feature, I have added thorough tests.
- [ ] Do we need to implement analytics? if so did you add the relevant
metrics to the dashboard?
- [ ] If this PR requires public announcement, mark it with
/release-notes label and add several sentences in this section.
## Checklist before merging
- [ ] Do not forget to reformat commit message to not include the above
checklist
---------
Co-authored-by: Konstantin Knizhnik <knizhnik@neon.tech>
## Problem
See https://neondb.slack.com/archives/C05L7D1JAUS/p1694614585955029https://www.notion.so/neondatabase/Duplicate-key-issue-651627ce843c45188fbdcb2d30fd2178
## Summary of changes
Swap old/new block references
## Checklist before requesting a review
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code.
- [ ] If it is a core feature, I have added thorough tests.
- [ ] Do we need to implement analytics? if so did you add the relevant
metrics to the dashboard?
- [ ] If this PR requires public announcement, mark it with
/release-notes label and add several sentences in this section.
## Checklist before merging
- [ ] Do not forget to reformat commit message to not include the above
checklist
---------
Co-authored-by: Konstantin Knizhnik <knizhnik@neon.tech>
Co-authored-by: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki@neon.tech>
