## Problem
When we change which physical pageservers a tenant is attached to, we
must update the control plane so that it can update computes. This will
be done via an HTTP hook, as described in
https://www.notion.so/neondatabase/Sharding-Service-Control-Plane-interface-6de56dd310a043bfa5c2f5564fa98365#1fe185a35d6d41f0a54279ac1a41bc94
## Summary of changes
- Optional CLI args `--control-plane-jwt-token` and `-compute-hook-url`
are added. If these are set, then we will use this HTTP endpoint,
instead of trying to use neon_local LocalEnv to update compute
configuration.
- Implement an HTTP-driven version of ComputeHook that calls into the
configured URL
- Notify for all tenants on startup, to ensure that we don't miss
notifications if we crash partway through a change, and carry a
`pending_compute_notification` flag at runtime to allow notifications to
fail without risking never sending the update.
- Add a test for all this
One might wonder: why not do a "forever" retry for compute hook
notifications, rather than carrying a flag on the shard to call
reconcile() again later. The reason is that we will later limit
concurreny of reconciles, when dealing with larger numbers of shards,
and if reconcile is stuck waiting for the control plane to accept a
notification request, it could jam up the whole system and prevent us
making other changes. Anyway: from the perspective of the outside world,
we _do_ retry forever, but we don't retry forever within a given
Reconciler lifetime.
The `pending_compute_notification` logic is predicated on later adding a
background task that just calls `Service::reconcile_all` on a schedule
to make sure that anything+everything that can fail a
Reconciler::reconcile call will eventually be retried.
This test became flaky when postgres retry handling was fixed to use
backoff delays -- each iteration in this test's loop was taking much
longer because pgbench doesn't fail until postgres has given up on
retrying to the pageserver.
We are just removing it, because the condition it tests is no longer
risky: we reload all metadata from remote storage on restart, so
crashing directly between making local changes and doing remote uploads
isn't interesting any more.
Closes: https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/2856
Closes: https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/5329
in `test_statvfs_pressure_{usage,min_avail_bytes}` we now race against
initial logical size calculation on-demand downloading the layers. first
wait out the initial logical sizes, then change the final asserts to be
"eventual", which is not great but it is faster than failing and
retrying.
this issue seems to happen only in debug mode tests.
Fixes: #6510
Adds an endpoint to the pageserver to S3-recover an entire tenant to a
specific given timestamp.
Required input parameters:
* `travel_to`: the target timestamp to recover the S3 state to
* `done_if_after`: a timestamp that marks the beginning of the recovery
process. retries of the query should keep this value constant. it *must*
be after `travel_to`, and also after any changes we want to revert, and
must represent a point in time before the endpoint is being called, all
of these time points in terms of the time source used by S3. these
criteria need to hold even in the face of clock differences, so I
recommend waiting a specific amount of time, then taking
`done_if_after`, then waiting some amount of time again, and only then
issuing the request.
Also important to note: the timestamps in S3 work at second accuracy, so
one needs to add generous waits before and after for the process to work
smoothly (at least 2-3 seconds).
We ignore the added test for the mocked S3 for now due to a limitation
in moto: https://github.com/getmoto/moto/issues/7300 .
Part of https://github.com/neondatabase/cloud/issues/8233
## Problem
Currently we have no retry mechanism for fetching basebackup. If there's
an unstable connection, starting compute will just fail.
## Summary of changes
Adds an exponential backoff with 7 retries to get the basebackup.
Don't require AWS access keys (AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID and
AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY) for S3 usage in the pytests, and also allow
AWS_PROFILE to be passed.
One of the two methods is required however.
This allows local development like:
```
aws sso login --profile dev
export ENABLE_REAL_S3_REMOTE_STORAGE=nonempty REMOTE_STORAGE_S3_REGION=eu-central-1 REMOTE_STORAGE_S3_BUCKET=neon-github-ci-tests AWS_PROFILE=dev
cargo build_testing && RUST_BACKTRACE=1 ./scripts/pytest -k debug-pg16 test_runner/regress/test_tenant_delete.py::test_tenant_delete_smoke
```
related earlier PR for the cargo unit tests of the `remote_storage` crate: #6202
---------
Co-authored-by: Alexander Bayandin <alexander@neon.tech>
changes:
- two messages instead of message every second when gate was closing
- replace the gate name string by using a pointer
- slow GateGuards are likely to log who they were (see example)
example found in regress tests: <https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/pull/6542#issuecomment-1919009256>
## Problem
See https://github.com/neondatabase/cloud/issues/8673
## Summary of changes
Download missed SLRU segments from page server
## Checklist before requesting a review
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code.
- [ ] If it is a core feature, I have added thorough tests.
- [ ] Do we need to implement analytics? if so did you add the relevant
metrics to the dashboard?
- [ ] If this PR requires public announcement, mark it with
/release-notes label and add several sentences in this section.
## Checklist before merging
- [ ] Do not forget to reformat commit message to not include the above
checklist
---------
Co-authored-by: Konstantin Knizhnik <knizhnik@neon.tech>
Co-authored-by: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki@neon.tech>
Some tests which are unit test alike do not need to run on different pg
versions. Logging test is one of them which I found for unrelated
reasons.
Co-authored-by: Alexander Bayandin <alexander@neon.tech>
Depends on: https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/pull/6468
## Problem
The sharding service will be used as a "virtual pageserver" by the
control plane -- so it needs the set of pageserver APIs that the control
plane uses, and to present them under identical URLs, including prefix
(/v1).
## Summary of changes
- Add missing APIs:
- Tenant deletion
- Timeline deletion
- Node list (used in test now, later in tools)
- `/location_config` API (for migrating tenants into the sharding
service)
- Rework attachment service URLs:
- `/v1` prefix is used for pageserver-compatible APIs
- `/upcall/v1` prefix is used for APIs that are called by the pageserver
(re-attach and validate)
- `/debug/v1` prefix is used for endpoints that are for testing
- `/control/v1` prefix is used for new sharding service APIs that do not
mimic a pageserver API, such as registering and configuring nodes.
- Add test_sharding_service. The sharding service already had some
collateral coverage from its use in general tests, but this is the first
dedicated testing for it.
## Problem
We currently can't create subscriptions in PG14 and PG15 because only
superusers can, and PG16 requires adding roles to
pg_create_subscription.
## Summary of changes
I added changes to PG14 and PG15 that allow neon_superuser to bypass the
superuser requirement. For PG16, I didn't do that but added a migration
that adds neon_superuser to pg_create_subscription. Also added a test to
make sure it works.
Since fdatasync is used for flushing WAL, changing file size is unsafe. Make
segment creation atomic by using tmp file + rename to avoid using partially
initialized segments.
fixes https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/6402
## Problem
See https://neondb.slack.com/archives/C06F5UJH601/p1706373716661439
## Summary of changes
Use None instead of 0 as initial accumulator value for calculating
maximal multixact XID.
## Checklist before requesting a review
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code.
- [ ] If it is a core feature, I have added thorough tests.
- [ ] Do we need to implement analytics? if so did you add the relevant
metrics to the dashboard?
- [ ] If this PR requires public announcement, mark it with
/release-notes label and add several sentences in this section.
## Checklist before merging
- [ ] Do not forget to reformat commit message to not include the above
checklist
---------
Co-authored-by: Konstantin Knizhnik <knizhnik@neon.tech>
Co-authored-by: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki@neon.tech>
## Problem
Spun off from https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/pull/6394 -- this PR
is just the persistence parts and the changes that enable it to work
nicely
## Summary of changes
- Revert #6444 and #6450
- In neon_local, start a vanilla postgres instance for the attachment
service to use.
- Adopt `diesel` crate for database access in attachment service. This
uses raw SQL migrations as the source of truth for the schema, so it's a
soft dependency: we can switch libraries pretty easily.
- Rewrite persistence.rs to use postgres (via diesel) instead of JSON.
- Preserve JSON read+write at startup and shutdown: this enables using
the JSON format in compatibility tests, so that we don't have to commit
to our DB schema yet.
- In neon_local, run database creation + migrations before starting
attachment service
- Run the initial reconciliation in Service::spawn in the background, so
that the pageserver + attachment service don't get stuck waiting for
each other to start, when restarting both together in a test.
## Problem
The support for sharding in the pageserver was written before
https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/pull/6205 landed, so when it landed
we couldn't directly test sharding.
## Summary of changes
- Add `test_sharding_smoke` which tests the basics of creating a
sharding tenant, creating a timeline within it, checking that data
within it is distributed.
- Add modes to pg_regress tests for running with 4 shards as well as
with 1.
Refactor out test_disk_usage_eviction tenant creation and add a custom
case with 4 tenants, 3 made with pgbench scale=1 and 1 made with pgbench
scale=4.
Because the tenants are created in order of scales [1, 1, 1, 4] this is
simple enough to demonstrate the problem with using absolute access
times, because on a disk usage based eviction run we will
disproportionally target the *first* scale=1 tenant(s), and the later
larger tenant does not lose anything.
This test is not enough to show the difference between `relative_equal`
and `relative_spare` (the fudge factor); much larger scale will be
needed for "the large tenant", but that will make debug mode tests
slower.
Cc: #5304
## Problem
For #6423, creating a reproducer turned out to be very easy, as an
extension to test_ondemand_activation.
However, before I had diagnosed the issue, I was starting with a more
brute force approach of running creation API calls in the background
while restarting a pageserver, and that shows up a bunch of other
interesting issues.
In this PR:
- Add the reproducer for #6423 by extending `test_ondemand_activation`
(confirmed that this test fails if I revert the fix from
https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/pull/6430)
- In timeline creation, return 503 responses when we get an error and
the tenant's cancellation token is set: this covers the cases where we
get an anyhow::Error from something during timeline creation as a result
of shutdown.
- While waiting for tenants to become active during creation, don't
.map_err() the result to a 500: instead let the `From` impl map the
result to something appropriate (this includes mapping shutdown to 503)
- During tenant creation, we were calling `Tenant::load_local` because
no Preload object is provided. This is usually harmless because the
tenant dir is empty, but if there are some half-created timelines in
there, bad things can happen. Propagate the SpawnMode into
Tenant::attach, so that it can properly skip _any_ attempt to load
timelines if creating.
- When we call upsert_location, there's a SpawnMode that tells us
whether to load from remote storage or not. But if the operation is a
retry and we already have the tenant, it is not correct to skip loading
from remote storage: there might be a timeline there. This isn't
strictly a correctness issue as long as the caller behaves correctly
(does not assume that any timelines are persistent until the creation is
acked), but it's a more defensive position.
- If we shut down while the task in Tenant::attach is running, it can
end up spawning rogue tasks. Fix this by holding a GateGuard through
here, and in upsert_location shutting down a tenant after calling
tenant_spawn if we can't insert it into tenants_map. This fixes the
expected behavior that after shutdown_all_tenants returns, no tenant
tasks are running.
- Add `test_create_churn_during_restart`, which runs tenant & timeline
creations across pageserver restarts.
- Update a couple of tests that covered cancellation, to reflect the
cleaner errors we now return.
## Problem
The initdb cancellation added in #5921 is not sufficient to reliably
abort the entire initdb process. Initdb also spawns children. The tests
added by #6310 (#6385) and #6436 now do initdb cancellations on a more
regular basis.
In #6385, I attempted to issue `killpg` (after giving it a new process
group ID) to kill not just the initdb but all its spawned subprocesses,
but this didn't work. Initdb doesn't take *that* long in the end either,
so we just wait until it concludes.
## Summary of changes
* revert initdb cancellation support added in #5921
* still return `Err(Cancelled)` upon cancellation, but this is just to
not have to remove the cancellation infrastructure
* fixes to the `test_tenant_delete_races_timeline_creation` test to make
it reliably pass
Fixes#6385
## Problem
There is "neon.pageserver_connstring" GUC with PGC_SIGHUP option,
allowing to change it using
pg_reload_conf(). It is used by control plane to update pageserver
connection string if page server is crashed,
relocated or new shards are added.
It is copied to shared memory because config can not be loaded during
query execution and we need to
reestablish connection to page server.
## Summary of changes
Copying connection string to shared memory is done by postmaster. And
other backends
should check update counter to determine of connection URL is changed
and connection needs to be reestablished.
We can not use standard Postgres LW-locks, because postmaster has proc
entry and so can not wait
on this primitive. This is why lockless access algorithm is implemented
using two atomic counters to enforce
consistent reading of connection string value from shared memory.
## Checklist before requesting a review
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code.
- [ ] If it is a core feature, I have added thorough tests.
- [ ] Do we need to implement analytics? if so did you add the relevant
metrics to the dashboard?
- [ ] If this PR requires public announcement, mark it with
/release-notes label and add several sentences in this section.
## Checklist before merging
- [ ] Do not forget to reformat commit message to not include the above
checklist
---------
Co-authored-by: Konstantin Knizhnik <knizhnik@neon.tech>
Co-authored-by: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki@neon.tech>
update_next_xid() doesn't have any special treatment for the invalid or
other special XIDs, so it will treat InvalidTransactionId (0) as a
regular XID. If old nextXid is smaller than 2^31, 0 will look like a
very old XID, and nothing happens. But if nextXid is greater than 2^31 0
will look like a very new XID, and update_next_xid() will incorrectly
bump up nextXID.
In the most straightforward way; safekeeper performs it in DELETE endpoint
implementation, with no coordination between sks.
delete_force endpoint in the code is renamed to delete as there is only one way
to delete.
## Problem
For PRs with `run-benchmarks` label, we don't upload results to the db,
making it harder to debug such tests. The only way to see some
numbers is by examining GitHub Action output which is really
inconvenient.
This PR adds zenbenchmark metrics to Allure reports.
## Summary of changes
- Create a json file with zenbenchmark results and attach it to allure
report
I just failed to see this earlier on #6136. layer counts are used as an
abstraction, and each of the two tenants lose proportionally about the
same amount of layers. sadly there is no difference in between
`relative_spare` and `relative_equal` as both of these end up evicting
the exact same amount of layers, but I'll try to add later another test
for those.
Cc: #5304
## Problem
To test sharding, we need something to control it. We could write python
code for doing this from the test runner, but this wouldn't be usable
with neon_local run directly, and when we want to write tests with large
number of shards/tenants, Rust is a better fit efficiently handling all
the required state.
This service enables automated tests to easily get a system with
sharding/HA without the test itself having to set this all up by hand:
existing tests can be run against sharded tenants just by setting a
shard count when creating the tenant.
## Summary of changes
Attachment service was previously a map of TenantId->TenantState, where
the principal state stored for each tenant was the generation and the
last attached pageserver. This enabled it to serve the re-attach and
validate requests that the pageserver requires.
In this PR, the scope of the service is extended substantially to do
overall management of tenants in the pageserver, including
tenant/timeline creation, live migration, evacuation of offline
pageservers etc. This is done using synchronous code to make declarative
changes to the tenant's intended state (`TenantState.policy` and
`TenantState.intent`), which are then translated into calls into the
pageserver by the `Reconciler`.
Top level summary of modules within
`control_plane/attachment_service/src`:
- `tenant_state`: structure that represents one tenant shard.
- `service`: implements the main high level such as tenant/timeline
creation, marking a node offline, etc.
- `scheduler`: for operations that need to pick a pageserver for a
tenant, construct a scheduler and call into it.
- `compute_hook`: receive notifications when a tenant shard is attached
somewhere new. Once we have locations for all the shards in a tenant,
emit an update to postgres configuration via the neon_local `LocalEnv`.
- `http`: HTTP stubs. These mostly map to methods on `Service`, but are
separated for readability and so that it'll be easier to adapt if/when
we switch to another RPC layer.
- `node`: structure that describes a pageserver node. The most important
attribute of a node is its availability: marking a node offline causes
tenant shards to reschedule away from it.
This PR is a precursor to implementing the full sharding service for
prod (#6342). What's the difference between this and a production-ready
controller for pageservers?
- JSON file persistence to be replaced with a database
- Limited observability.
- No concurrency limits. Marking a pageserver offline will try and
migrate every tenant to a new pageserver concurrently, even if there are
thousands.
- Very simple scheduler that only knows to pick the pageserver with
fewest tenants, and place secondary locations on a different pageserver
than attached locations: it does not try to place shards for the same
tenant on different pageservers. This matters little in tests, because
picking the least-used pageserver usually results in round-robin
placement.
- Scheduler state is rebuilt exhaustively for each operation that
requires a scheduler.
- Relies on neon_local mechanisms for updating postgres: in production
this would be something that flows through the real control plane.
---------
Co-authored-by: Arpad Müller <arpad-m@users.noreply.github.com>
Follows #6123
Closes: https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/5342
The approach here is to avoid using `Layer` from secondary tenants, and
instead make the eviction types (e.g. `EvictionCandidate`) have a
variant that carries a Layer for attached tenants, and a different
variant for secondary tenants.
Other changes:
- EvictionCandidate no longer carries a `Timeline`: this was only used
for providing a witness reference to remote timeline client.
- The types for returning eviction candidates are all in
disk_usage_eviction_task.rs now, whereas some of them were in
timeline.rs before.
- The EvictionCandidate type replaces LocalLayerInfoForDiskUsageEviction
type, which was basically the same thing.
Fixes the race condition between timeline creation and tenant deletion
outlined in #6255.
Related: #5914, which is a similar race condition about the uninit
marker file.
Fixes#6255
Also shuts down `Broker`, which, before this PR, we did start in
`start()` but relied on the fixture to stop. Do it a bit earlier so
that, after `NeonEnv.stop()` returns, there are no child processes using
`repo_dir`.
Also, drive-by-fixes inverted logic around `ps_assert_metric_no_errors`,
missed during https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/pull/6295
---------
Co-authored-by: Alexander Bayandin <alexander@neon.tech>
## Problem
Previously, `GET /v1/tenant/:tenant_id/timeline` and `GET
/v1/tenant/:tenant_id/timeline/:timeline_id`
would bump the priority of the background task which computes the
initial logical size by cancelling
the wait on the synchronisation semaphore. However, the request would
still return an approximate
logical size. It's undesirable to force background work for a status
request.
## Summary of changes
This PR updates the priority used by the timeline status request such
that they don't do priority boosting
by default anymore. An optional query parameter,
`force-await-initial-logical-size`, is added for both
mentioned endpoints. When set to true, it will skip the concurrency
limiting semaphore and wait
for the background task to complete before returning the exact logical
size.
In order to exercise this behaviour in a test I had to add an extra
failpoint. If you think it's too intrusive,
it can be removed.
Also fixeda small bug where the cancellation of a download is reported as an
opaque download failure upstream. This caused `test_location_conf_churn`
to fail at teardown due to a WARN log line.
Closes https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/6168
## Problem
The code for tenant create and tenant attach was just a special case of
what upsert_location does.
## Summary of changes
- Use `upsert_location` for create and attach APIs
- Clean up error handling in upsert_location so that it can generate
appropriate HTTP response codes
- Update tests that asserted the old non-idempotent behavior of attach
- Rework the `test_ignore_while_attaching` test, and fix tenant shutdown
during activation, which this test was supposed to cover, but it was
actually just waiting for activation to complete.
Part of #5771
Extracted from https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/pull/6214
This PR makes the test suite sensitive to the new env var
`NEON_ENV_BUILDER_FROM_REPO_DIR_USE_OVERLAYFS`.
If it is set, `NeonEnvBuilder.from_repo_dir` uses overlayfs
to duplicate the the snapshot repo dir contents.
Since mounting requires root privileges, we use sudo to perform
the mounts. That, and macOS support, is also why copytree remains
the default.
If we ever run on a filesystem with copy reflink support, we should
consider that as an alternative.
This PR can be tried on a Linux machine on the
`test_backward_compatiblity` test, which uses `from_repo_dir`.
This is a lightweight change to keep the scrubber providing sensible
output when using sharding.
- The timeline count was wrong when using sharding
- When checking for tenant existence, we didn't re-use results between
different shards in the same tenant
Closes: https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/5929
