Protocol version 2 has been the default for a while now, and we no
longer have any computes running in production that used protocol
version 1. This completes the migration by removing support for v1 in
both the pageserver and the compute.
See issue #6211.
## Problem
Currently, we compare `neon.safekeepers` values as is, so we
unnecessarily restart walproposer even if safekeepers set didn't change.
This leads to errors like:
```log
FATAL: [WP] restarting walproposer to change safekeeper list
from safekeeper-8.us-east-2.aws.neon.tech:6401,safekeeper-11.us-east-2.aws.neon.tech:6401,safekeeper-10.us-east-2.aws.neon.tech:6401
to safekeeper-11.us-east-2.aws.neon.tech:6401,safekeeper-8.us-east-2.aws.neon.tech:6401,safekeeper-10.us-east-2.aws.neon.tech:6401
```
## Summary of changes
Split the GUC into the list of individual safekeepers and properly
compare. We could've done that somewhere on the upper level, e.g.,
control plane, but I think it's still better when the actual config
consumer is smarter and doesn't rely on upper levels.
Routes and their handlers were in a bit different order in 1) routes
list 2) their implementation 3) python client 4) openapi spec, making
addition of new ones intimidating. Make it the same everywhere, roughly
lexicographically but preserving some of existing logic.
No functional changes.
This PR:
* Implements the rule that archived timelines require all of their
children to be archived as well, as specified in the RFC. There is no
fancy locking mechanism though, so the precondition can still be broken.
As a TODO for later, we still allow unarchiving timelines with archived
parents.
* Adds an `is_archived` flag to `TimelineInfo`
* Adds timeline_archival_config to `PageserverHttpClient`
* Adds a new `test_timeline_archive` test, loosely based on
`test_timeline_delete`
Part of #8088
## Problem
- If a reconciler was waiting to be able to notify computes about a
change, but the control plane was waiting for the controller to finish a
timeline creation/deletion, the overall system can deadlock.
- If a tenant shard was migrated concurrently with a timeline
creation/deletion, there was a risk that the timeline operation could be
applied to a non-latest-generation location, and thereby not really be
persistent. This has never happened in practice, but would eventually
happen at scale.
Closes: #8743
## Summary of changes
- Introduce `Service::tenant_remote_mutation` helper, which looks up
shards & generations and passes them into an inner function that may do
remote I/O to pageservers. Before returning success, this helper checks
that generations haven't incremented, to guarantee that changes are
persistent.
- Convert tenant_timeline_create, tenant_timeline_delete, and
tenant_timeline_detach_ancestor to use this helper.
- These functions no longer block on ensure_attached unless the tenant
was never attached at all, so they should make progress even if we can't
complete compute notifications.
This increases the database load from timeline/create operations, but
only with cheap read transactions.
## Problem
Previously, the controller only used the shard counts for scheduling.
This works well when hosting only many-sharded tenants, but works much
less well when hosting single-sharded tenants that have a greater
deviation in size-per-shard.
Closes: https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/7798
## Summary of changes
- Instead of UtilizationScore, carry the full PageserverUtilization
through into the Scheduler.
- Use the PageserverUtilization::score() instead of shard count when
ordering nodes in scheduling.
Q: Why did test_sharding_split_smoke need updating in this PR?
A: There's an interesting side effect during shard splits: because we do
not decrement the shard count in the utilization when we de-schedule the
shards from before the split, the controller will now prefer to pick
_different_ nodes for shards compared with which ones held secondaries
before the split. We could use our knowledge of splitting to fix up the
utilizations more actively in this situation, but I'm leaning toward
leaving the code simpler, as in practical systems the impact of one
shard on the utilization of a node should be fairly low (single digit
%).
part of https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/8623
We want to discover potential aux v1 customers that we might have missed
from the migrations.
## Summary of changes
Log warnings on basebackup, load timeline, and the first put_file.
---------
Signed-off-by: Alex Chi Z <chi@neon.tech>
This reverts commit cbe8c77997.
This change was originally made to test a hypothesis, but after that,
the proper fix#8669 was merged, so now it's not needed. Moreover, the
test is still flaky, so probably this bug was not a reason of the
flakiness.
Related to #8097
This copies a piece of code from `test_scrubber_physical_gc_ancestors`
to fix a source of flakiness: later on we rely on stuff being older than
a second, but the test can run faster under optimal conditions (as
happened to me locally, but also obvservable in
[this](https://neon-github-public-dev.s3.amazonaws.com/reports/main/10470762360/index.html#testresult/f713b02657db4b4c/retries)
allure report):
```
test_runner/regress/test_storage_scrubber.py:169: in test_scrubber_physical_gc
assert gc_summary["remote_storage_errors"] == 0
E assert 1 == 0
```
After #8655, we needed to mark some tests to shut down immediately. To
aid these tests, try the new pattern of `flush_ep_to_pageserver`
followed by a non-compacting checkpoint. This moves the general graceful
shutdown problem of having too much to flush at shutdown into the test.
Also, add logging for how long the graceful shutdown took, if we got to
complete it for faster log eyeballing.
Fixes: #8712
Cc: #8715, #8708
Going through the list of recent flaky tests, trying to fix those
related to graceful shutdown.
- test_forward_compatibility: flush and wait for uploads to avoid
graceful shutdown
- test_layer_bloating: in the end the endpoint and vanilla are still up
=> immediate shutdown
- test_lagging_sk: pageserver shutdown is not related to the test =>
immediate shutdown
- test_lsn_lease_size: pageserver flushing is not needed => immediate
shutdown
Additionally:
- remove `wait_for_upload` usage from workload fixture
Cc: #8708Fixes: #8710
## Problem
We want to run our regression test suite on ARM.
## Summary of changes
- run regression tests on release ARM builds
- run `build-neon` (including rust tests) on debug ARM builds
- add `arch` parameter to test to distinguish them in the allure report
and in a database
## Problem
Storage controllers did not have the right token to speak to their peers
for leadership transitions.
## Summary of changes
Accept a peer jwt token for the storage controller.
Epic: https://github.com/neondatabase/cloud/issues/14701
## Problem
The default Postgres version is set to 15 in code, while we use 16 in
most of the other places (and Postgres 17 is coming)
## Summary of changes
- Run `benchmarks` job with Postgres 16 (instead of Postgres 14)
- Set `DEFAULT_PG_VERSION` to 16 in all places
- Remove deprecated `--pg-version` pytest argument
- Update `test_metadata_bincode_serde_ensure_roundtrip` for Postgres 16
Migrates most of the remaining parts of the scrubber to remote_storage:
* `pageserver_physical_gc`
* `scan_metadata` for pageservers (safekeepers were done in #8595)
* `download()` in `tenant_snapshot`. The main `tenant_snapshot` is not
migrated as it uses version history to be able to work in the face of
ongoing changes.
Part of #7547
After the rollout has succeeded, we now set the default image
compression to be enabled.
We also remove its explicit mention from `neon_fixtures.py` added in
#8368 as it is now the default (and we switch to `zstd(1)` which is a
bit nicer on CPU time).
Part of https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/5431
## Problem
Multiple increase/decrease LFC limit may cause unlimited growth of LFC
file because punched holes while LFC shrinking are not reused when LFC
is extended.
## Summary of changes
Keep track of holes and reused them when LFC size is increased.
## Checklist before requesting a review
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code.
- [ ] If it is a core feature, I have added thorough tests.
- [ ] Do we need to implement analytics? if so did you add the relevant
metrics to the dashboard?
- [ ] If this PR requires public announcement, mark it with
/release-notes label and add several sentences in this section.
## Checklist before merging
- [ ] Do not forget to reformat commit message to not include the above
checklist
---------
Co-authored-by: Konstantin Knizhnik <knizhnik@neon.tech>
## Problem
Current superuser check always passes because it returns a tuple like
`(False,)`, and then the `if not superuser` passes.
## Summary of changes
Fixes the issue by unwrapping the tuple. Verified that it works against
a project where I don't have superuser.
## Problem
https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/pull/8588 implemented the mechanism
for storage controller
leadership transfers. However, there's no tests that exercise the
behaviour.
## Summary of changes
1. Teach `neon_local` how to handle multiple storage controller
instances. Each storage controller
instance gets its own subdirectory (`storage_controller_1, ...`).
`storage_controller start|stop` subcommands
have also been extended to optionally accept an instance id.
2. Add a storage controller proxy test fixture. It's a basic HTTP server
that forwards requests from pageserver
and test env to the currently configured storage controller.
3. Add a test which exercises storage controller leadership transfer.
4. Finally fix a couple bugs that the test surfaced
Per #8674, disallow node configuration while drain/fill are ongoing.
Implement it by adding a only-http wrapper
`Service::external_node_configure` which checks for operation existing
before configuring.
Additionally:
- allow cancelling drain/fill after a pageserver has restarted and
transitioned to WarmingUp
Fixes: #8674
## Problem
The control file contains the id of the safekeeper that uploaded it.
Previously, when sending a snapshot of the control file to another sk,
it would eventually be gc-ed by the receiving sk. This is incorrect
because the original sk might still need it later.
## Summary of Changes
When sending a snapshot and the control file contains an uploaded
segment:
* Create a copy of the segment in s3 with the destination sk in the
object name
* Tweak the streamed control file to point to the object create in the
previous step
Note that the snapshot endpoint now has to know the id of the requestor,
so the api has been extended to include the node if of the destination
sk.
Closes https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/8542
With additional phases from #8430 the `detach_ancestor::Error` became
untenable. Split it up into phases, and introduce laundering for
remaining `anyhow::Error` to propagate them as most often
`Error::ShuttingDown`.
Additionally, complete FIXMEs.
Cc: #6994
## Problem
The storage scrubber was reporting warnings for lots of timelines like:
```
WARN Missed some shards at count ShardCount(0) tenant_id=25eb7a83d9a2f90ac0b765b6ca84cf4c
```
These were spurious: these tenants are fine. There was a bug in
accumulating the ShardIndex for each tenant, whereby multiple timelines
would lead us to add the same ShardIndex more than one.
Closes: #8646
## Summary of changes
- Accumulate ShardIndex in a BTreeSet instead of a Vec
- Extend the test to reproduce the issue
## Problem
See https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/8499
## Summary of changes
Save HEAP_COMBOCID flag in WAL and do not clear it in redo handlers.
Related Postgres PRs:
https://github.com/neondatabase/postgres/pull/457https://github.com/neondatabase/postgres/pull/458https://github.com/neondatabase/postgres/pull/459
## Checklist before requesting a review
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code.
- [ ] If it is a core feature, I have added thorough tests.
- [ ] Do we need to implement analytics? if so did you add the relevant
metrics to the dashboard?
- [ ] If this PR requires public announcement, mark it with
/release-notes label and add several sentences in this section.
## Checklist before merging
- [ ] Do not forget to reformat commit message to not include the above
checklist
---------
Co-authored-by: Konstantin Knizhnik <knizhnik@neon.tech>
Co-authored-by: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki@neon.tech>
With the persistent gc blocking, we can now retry reparenting timelines
which had failed for whatever reason on the previous attempt(s).
Restructure the detach_ancestor into three phases:
- prepare (insert persistent gc blocking, copy lsn prefix, layers)
- detach and reparent
- reparenting can fail, so we might need to retry this portion
- complete (remove persistent gc blocking)
Cc: #6994
After #8655 we've had a few issues (mostly tracked on #8708) with the
graceful shutdown. In order to shutdown more of the processes and catch
more errors, for example, from all pageservers, do an immediate shutdown
for those nodes which fail the initial (possibly graceful) shutdown.
Cc: #6485
A few of the benchmarks have started failing after #8655 where they are
waiting for compactor task. Reads done by image layer creation should
already be cancellation sensitive because vectored get does a check each
time, but try sprinkling additional cancellation points to:
- each partition
- after each vectored read batch
