## Problem
This is a prerequisite for neondatabase/neon#12575 to keep all things
relevant to `build-tools` image in a single directory
## Summary of changes
- Rename `build_tools/` to `build-tools/`
- Move `build-tools.Dockerfile` to `build-tools/Dockerfile`
# TLDR
This PR is a no-op.
## Problem
When a SK loses a disk, it must recover all WALs from the very
beginning. This may take days/weeks to catch up to the latest WALs for
all timelines it owns.
## Summary of changes
When SK starts up,
if it finds that it has 0 timelines,
- it will ask SC for the timeline it owns.
- Then, pulls the timeline from its peer safekeepers to restore the WAL
redundancy right away.
After pulling timeline is complete, it will become active and accepts
new WALs.
The current impl is a prototype. We can optimize the impl further, e.g.,
parallel pull timelines.
---------
Co-authored-by: Haoyu Huang <haoyu.huang@databricks.com>
https://github.com/neondatabase/cloud/issues/19011
Measure relative performance for prewarmed and non-prewarmed endpoints.
Add test that runs on every commit, and one performance test with a
remote cluster.
## Problem
In https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/pull/12513, the new code was
implemented to retry 404 errors caused by the replication lag. However,
this implemented the new logic, making the script more complicated,
while we have an existing one in `neon_api.py`.
## Summary of changes
The existing mechanism is used to retry 404 errors.
---------
Co-authored-by: Alexey Masterov <alexey.masterov@databricks.com>
## Problem
We don't validate the validity of the `new_sk_set` before starting the
migration. It is validated later, so the migration to an invalid
safekeeper set will fail anyway. But at this point we might already
commited an invalid `new_sk_set` to the database and there is no `abort`
command yet (I ran into this issue in neon_local and ruined the timeline
:)
- Part of https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/11669
## Summary of changes
- Add safekeeper count and safekeeper duplication checks before starting
the migration
- Test that we validate the `new_sk_set` before starting the migration
- Add `force` option to the `TimelineSafekeeperMigrateRequest` to
disable not-mandatory checks
# TLDR
Problem-I is a bug fix. The rest are no-ops.
## Problem I
Page server checks image layer creation based on the elapsed time but
this check depends on the current logical size, which is only computed
on shard 0. Thus, for non-0 shards, the check will be ineffective and
image creation will never be done for idle tenants.
## Summary of changes I
This PR fixes the problem by simply removing the dependency on current
logical size.
## Summary of changes II
This PR adds a timeout when calling page server to split shard to make
sure SC does not wait for the API call forever. Currently the PR doesn't
adds any retry logic because it's not clear whether page server shard
split can be safely retried if the existing operation is still ongoing
or left the storage in a bad state. Thus it's better to abort the whole
operation and restart.
## Problem III
`test_remote_failures` requires PS to be compiled in the testing mode.
For PS in dev/staging, they are compiled without this mode.
## Summary of changes III
Remove the restriction and also increase the number of total failures
allowed.
## Summary of changes IV
remove test on PS getpage http route.
---------
Co-authored-by: Chen Luo <chen.luo@databricks.com>
Co-authored-by: Yecheng Yang <carlton.yang@databricks.com>
Co-authored-by: Vlad Lazar <vlad@neon.tech>
