## Problem
In some cases, we were returning a very shallow error like `error
sending request for url (XXX)`, which made it very hard to figure out
the actual error.
## Summary of changes
Use `{:?}` in a few places, and remove it from places where we were
printing a string anyway.
## Problem
1. d04d924 added separate metrics for total requests and failures
separately, but it doesn't make much sense. We could just have a unified
counter with `http_status`.
2. `test_compute_migrations_retry` had a race, i.e., it was waiting for
the last successful migration, not an actual failure. This was revealed
after adding an assert on failure metric in d04d924.
## Summary of changes
1. Switch to unified counters for `compute_ctl` requests.
2. Add a waiting loop into `test_compute_migrations_retry` to eliminate
the race.
Part of neondatabase/cloud#17590
## Problem
There are several parts of `compute_ctl` with a very low visibility of
errors:
1. DB migrations that run async in the background after compute start.
2. Requests made to control plane (currently only `GetSpec`).
3. Requests made to the remote extensions server.
## Summary of changes
Add new counters to quickly evaluate the amount of errors among the
fleet.
Part of neondatabase/cloud#17590
Before, compute_ctl didn't have a good registry for what command would
run when, depending exclusively on sync code to apply changes. When
users have many databases/roles to manage, this step can take a
substantial amount of time, breaking assumptions about low (re)start
times in other systems.
This commit reduces the time compute_ctl takes to restart when changes
must be applied, by making all commands more or less blind writes, and
applying these commands in an asynchronous context, only waiting for
completion once we know the commands have all been sent.
Additionally, this reduces time spent by batching per-database
operations where previously we would create a new SQL connection for
every user-database operation we planned to execute.
Requires https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/pull/9086 first to have
`local_proxy_config`. This logic can still be reviewed implementation
wise.
Create JWT Auth functionality related roles without attributes and
`neon_superuser` group.
Read the JWT related roles from `local_proxy_config` `JWKS` settings and
handle them differently than other console created roles.
## Problem
I need `neon_superuser` to be allowed to create snapshots for
replication tests
## Summary of changes
Adds a migration that grants these functions to neon_superuser
It makes them much easier to reason about, and allows other SQL tooling
to operate on them like language servers, formatters, etc.
I also brought back the removed migrations such that we can more easily
understand what they were. I included a "-- SKIP" comment describing why
those migrations are now skipped. We no longer skip migrations by
checking if it is empty, but instead check to see if the migration
starts with "-- SKIP".
We keep the practice of keeping the compiler up to date, pointing to the
latest release. This is done by many other projects in the Rust
ecosystem as well.
Release notes: https://blog.rust-lang.org/2024/05/02/Rust-1.78.0.html
Prior update was in #7198
This pull request disables neon extension auto upgrade to help the next
compute image upgrade smooth.
## Summary of changes
We have two places to auto-upgrade neon extension: during compute spec
update, and when the compute node starts. The compute spec update logic
is always there, and the compute node start logic is added in
https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/pull/7029. In this pull request, we
disable both of them, so that we can still roll back to an older version
of compute before figuring out the best way of extension
upgrade-downgrade. https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/6936
We will enable auto-upgrade in the next release following this release.
There are no other extension upgrades from release 4917 and therefore
after this pull request, it would be safe to revert to release 4917.
Impact:
* Project created after unpinning the compute image -> if we need to
roll back, **they will stuck**, because the default neon extension
version is 1.3. Need to manually pin the compute image version if such
things happen.
* Projects already stuck on staging due to not downgradeable -> I don't
know their current status, maybe they are already running the latest
compute image?
* Other projects -> can be rolled back to release 4917.
Signed-off-by: Alex Chi Z <chi@neon.tech>
## Problem
Fix https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/7003. Fix
https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/6982. Currently, neon
extension is only upgraded when new compute spec gets applied, for
example, when creating a new role or creating a new database. This also
resolves `neon.lfc_stat` not found warnings in prod.
## Summary of changes
This pull request adds the logic to spawn a background thread to upgrade
the neon extension version if the compute is a primary. If for whatever
reason the upgrade fails, it reports an error to the console and does
not impact compute node state.
This change can be further applied to 3rd-party extension upgrades. We
can silently upgrade the version of 3rd party extensions in the
background in the future.
Questions:
* Does alter extension takes some kind of lock that will block user
requests?
* Does `ALTER EXTENSION` writes to the database if nothing needs to be
upgraded? (may impact storage size).
Otherwise it's safe to land this pull request.
Signed-off-by: Alex Chi Z <chi@neon.tech>
## Problem
Following up https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/pull/6884, hopefully,
a real final fix for https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/6236.
## Summary of changes
`handle_migrations` is done over the main `postgres` db connection.
Therefore, the privileges assigned here do not work with databases
created later (i.e., `neondb`). This pull request moves the grants to
`handle_grants`, so that it runs for each DB created. The SQL is added
into the `BEGIN/END` block, so that it takes only one RTT to apply all
of them.
Signed-off-by: Alex Chi Z <chi@neon.tech>
## Problem
Following up on https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/pull/6845, we did
not make the default privileges grantable before, and therefore, even if
the users have full privileges, they are not able to grant them to
others.
Should be a final fix for
https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/6236.
## Summary of changes
Add `WITH GRANT` to migrations so that neon_superuser can grant the
permissions.
---------
Signed-off-by: Alex Chi Z <chi@neon.tech>
## Problem
fix https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/6236 again
## Summary of changes
This pull request adds a setup command in compute spec to modify default
privileges of public schema to have full permission on table/sequence
for neon_superuser. If an extension upgrades to superuser during
creation, the tables/sequences they create in the public schema will be
automatically granted to neon_superuser.
Questions:
* does it impose any security flaws? public schema should be fine...
* for all extensions that create tables in schemas other than public, we
will need to manually handle them (e.g., pg_anon).
* we can modify some extensions to remove their superuser requirement in
the future.
* we may contribute to Postgres to allow for the creation of extensions
with a specific user in the future.
---------
Signed-off-by: Alex Chi Z <chi@neon.tech>
if anon is in shared_preload_libraries.
Users cannot install it themselves, because superuser is required.
GRANT all priveleged needed to use it to db_owner
We use the neon fork of the extension, because small change to sql file
is needed to allow db_owner to use it.
This feature is behind a feature flag AnonExtension,
so it is not enabled by default.
## Problem
We currently can't create subscriptions in PG14 and PG15 because only
superusers can, and PG16 requires adding roles to
pg_create_subscription.
## Summary of changes
I added changes to PG14 and PG15 that allow neon_superuser to bypass the
superuser requirement. For PG16, I didn't do that but added a migration
that adds neon_superuser to pg_create_subscription. Also added a test to
make sure it works.
There is still default 'postgres' database, that may contain objects
owned by the role or some ACLs. We need to reassign objects in this
database too.
## Problem
If customer deleted all databases and then tries to delete role, that
has some non-standard ACLs,
`apply_config` operation will stuck because of failing role deletion.
## Problem
## Summary of changes
## Checklist before requesting a review
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code.
- [ ] If it is a core feature, I have added thorough tests.
- [ ] Do we need to implement analytics? if so did you add the relevant
metrics to the dashboard?
- [ ] If this PR requires public announcement, mark it with
/release-notes label and add several sentences in this section.
## Checklist before merging
- [ ] Do not forget to reformat commit message to not include the above
checklist
Temporarily reset neon.max_cluster_size to avoid
the possibility of hitting the limit, while we are applying config:
creating new extensions, roles, etc...
- Run CREATE EXTENSION neon for template1, so that it was created in all databases.
- Run ALTER EXTENSION neon in all databases, to always have the newest version of the extension in computes.
- Add test_neon_extension test
## Problem
Some requests with `Authorization` header did not properly set the
`Bearer ` prefix. Problem explained here
https://github.com/neondatabase/cloud/issues/6390.
## Summary of changes
Added `Bearer ` prefix to missing requests.
## Problem
Role need to have REPLICATION privilege to be able to used for logical
replication.
New roles are created with this option.
This PR tries to update existed roles.
## Summary of changes
Update roles in `handle_roles` method
## Checklist before requesting a review
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code.
- [ ] If it is a core feature, I have added thorough tests.
- [ ] Do we need to implement analytics? if so did you add the relevant
metrics to the dashboard?
- [ ] If this PR requires public announcement, mark it with
/release-notes label and add several sentences in this section.
## Checklist before merging
- [ ] Do not forget to reformat commit message to not include the above
checklist
---------
Co-authored-by: Konstantin Knizhnik <knizhnik@neon.tech>
## Problem
## Summary of changes
## Checklist before requesting a review
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code.
- [ ] If it is a core feature, I have added thorough tests.
- [ ] Do we need to implement analytics? if so did you add the relevant
metrics to the dashboard?
- [ ] If this PR requires public announcement, mark it with
/release-notes label and add several sentences in this section.
## Checklist before merging
- [ ] Do not forget to reformat commit message to not include the above
checklist
Co-authored-by: Konstantin Knizhnik <knizhnik@neon.tech>
