moved sanitizers in its owm workflow
merged all jobs into onme
cleaned up failing job
cleaned up failing job
running just tests
fixing build
reverting changes
fixing linter error and build error
clearning up job
added wal and extension builds
fixing build
fixing build
fixing build
added use sanitizer patch
testing if sanitiser work in main workflow
fixed format issue
fixing format issue
fixing format issue
added flags
disabled flags
enabling flags
enabling flags
added more options to flag
fixing build
fixing build
testing the regression run
added asan and usban flag for regression test
commented unit test and release build
fixing build
fix neon for sanitizers
enabled unit test
updated branch to test the fix
updated branch to test the fix
updated the commit id
fixing build
restoring the submodules to main
updated git modules and revision of commit
updated postgres 16 vendor dir
removed test
## Problem
`black` is slow sometimes, we can replace it with `ruff format` (a new
feature in 0.1.2 [0]), which produces pretty similar to black style [1].
On my local machine (MacBook M1 Pro 16GB):
```
# `black` on main
$ hyperfine "BLACK_CACHE_DIR=/dev/null poetry run black ."
Benchmark 1: BLACK_CACHE_DIR=/dev/null poetry run black .
Time (mean ± σ): 3.131 s ± 0.090 s [User: 5.194 s, System: 0.859 s]
Range (min … max): 3.047 s … 3.354 s 10 runs
```
```
# `ruff format` on the current PR
$ hyperfine "RUFF_NO_CACHE=true poetry run ruff format"
Benchmark 1: RUFF_NO_CACHE=true poetry run ruff format
Time (mean ± σ): 300.7 ms ± 50.2 ms [User: 259.5 ms, System: 76.1 ms]
Range (min … max): 267.5 ms … 420.2 ms 10 runs
```
## Summary of changes
- Replace `black` with `ruff format` everywhere
- [0] https://docs.astral.sh/ruff/formatter/
- [1] https://docs.astral.sh/ruff/formatter/#black-compatibility
## Problem
`cargo test` doesn't support timeouts
or junit output format
## Summary of changes
- Add `nextest` to `build-tools` image
- Switch `cargo test` with `cargo nextest` on CI
- Set timeout
## Problem
Fix build-tools image tag calculation for PRs.
Broken in https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/pull/6195
## Summary of changes
- Use `pinned` tag instead of `$GITHUB_RUN_ID` if there's no changes in
the dockerfile (and we don't build such image)
## Fixing GitHub workflow issue related to build and push images
## Summary of changes
Followup of PR#608[move docker file from build repo to neon to solve
issue some issues
The build started failing because it missed a validation in logic that
determines changes in the docker file
Also, all the dependent jobs were skipped because of the build and push
of the image job.
To address the above issue following changes were made
- we are adding validation to generate image tag even if it's a merge to
repo.
- All the dependent jobs won't skip even if the build and push image job
is skipped.
- We have moved the logic to generate a tag in the sub-workflow. As the
tag name was necessary to be passed to the sub-workflow it made sense to
abstract that away where it was needed and then store it as an output
variable so that downward dependent jobs could access the value.
- This made the dependency logic easy and we don't need complex
expressions to check the condition on which it will run
- An earlier PR was closed that tried solving a similar problem that has
some feedback and context before creating this PR
https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/pull/6175
## Checklist before requesting a review
- [x] Move the tag generation logic from the main workflow to the
sub-workflow of build and push the image
- [x] Add a condition to generate an image tag for a non-PR-related run
- [x] remove complex if the condition from the job if conditions
---------
Co-authored-by: Alexander Bayandin <alexander@neon.tech>
Co-authored-by: Abhijeet Patil <abhijeet@neon.tech>
## Problem
To understand differences in performance between neon, aurora and rds we
want to collect explain analyze plans and pg_stat_statements for
selected benchmarking runs
## Summary of changes
Add workflow input options to collect explain and pg_stat_statements for
benchmarking workflow
Co-authored-by: BodoBolero <bodobolero@gmail.com>
It turns out the issue with skipped jobs is not so trivial (because
Github checks jobs transitively), a possible workaround with `if:
always() && contains(fromJSON('["success", "skipped"]'),
needs.build-buildtools-image.result)` will tangle the workflow really
bad. We'll need to come up with a better solution.
To unblock the main I'm going to revert
https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/pull/6082.
## Currently our build docker file is located in the build repo it makes
sense to have it as a part of our neon repo
## Summary of changes
We had the docker file that we use to build our binary and other tools
resided in the build repo
It made sense to bring the docker file to its repo where it has been
used
So that the contributors can also view it and amend if required
It will reduce the maintenance. Docker file changes and code changes can
be accommodated in same PR
Also, building the image and pushing it to ECR is abstracted in a
reusable workflow. Ideal is to use that for any other jobs too
## Checklist before requesting a review
- [x] Moved the docker file used to build the binary from the build repo
to the neon repo
- [x] adding gh workflow to build and push the image
- [x] adding gh workflow to tag the pushed image
- [x] update readMe file
---------
Co-authored-by: Abhijeet Patil <abhijeet@neon.tech>
Co-authored-by: Alexander Bayandin <alexander@neon.tech>
## Problem
`HEAD` commit for a PR is a phantom merge commit which skews the baseline
commit for coverage reports.
See
https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/pull/5751#issuecomment-1790717867
## Summary of changes
- Use commit hash instead of `HEAD` for finding baseline commits for
code coverage
- Use the base branch for PRs or the current branch for pushes
rationale: some crates pull these in as default; hopefully these hints
will require less cleanup-after and Cargo.lock file watching.
follow-up to #5848.
## Problem
I've added `BUILD_TAG` to docker images.
(https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/pull/5812), but forgot to add it
to services that we build for tests
## Summary of changes
- Set `BUILD_TAG` in `build-neon` job
## Problem
Some developers use workstations with arm CPUs, and sometimes x86-64
code is not fully compatible with it (for example,
https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/pull/5827).
Although we don't have arm CPUs in the prod (yet?), it is worth having
some basic checks for this architecture to have a better developer
experience.
Closes https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/5829
## Summary of changes
- Run `check-codestyle-rust`-like & `build-neon`-like jobs on Arm runner
- Add `run-extra-build-*` label to run all available extra builds
replace the checkbox list with a a proper task list in the epic template
NB: this PR does not change the code, it only touches the github issue
templates
## Problem
https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/pull/5576 added `build-tag`
reporting to `libmetrics_build_info`, but it's not reported because we
didn't set the corresponding env variable in the build process.
## Summary of changes
- Add `BUILD_TAG` env var while building services
Prepare for a new release workflow
* Release PR is created on Fridays
* The discussion/approval happens during Friday
* Sunday morning the deployment will be done in central-il and perf
tests will be run
* On Monday early IST morning gradually start rolling (starting from US
regions as they are still in weekend time)
See slack for discussion:
https://neondb.slack.com/archives/C04P81J55LK/p1698565305607839?thread_ts=1698428241.031979&cid=C04P81J55LK
Only applicable change was neondatabase/autoscaling#584, setting
pgbouncer auth_dbname=postgres in order to fix superuser connections
from preventing dropping databases.
## Problem
We'll need to switch `REMOTE_STORAGE_AZURE_REGION` from the current
`eastus2` region to something `eu-central-1`-like. This may require
changing `AZURE_STORAGE_ACCESS_KEY`.
To make it possible to switch from one place (not to break a lot of
builds on CI), move `REMOTE_STORAGE_AZURE_CONTAINER` and
`REMOTE_STORAGE_AZURE_REGION` to GitHub Variables.
See https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/settings/variables/actions
## Summary of changes
- Get values for `REMOTE_STORAGE_AZURE_CONTAINER` &
`REMOTE_STORAGE_AZURE_REGION` from GitHub Variables
## Problem
We started to store test results in a new format in
https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/pull/4549.
This PR switches scripts to query this db.
(we can completely remove old DB/ingestions scripts in a couple of
weeks after the PR merged)
## Summary of changes
- `scripts/benchmark_durations.py` query new database
- `scripts/flaky_tests.py` query new database
Only applicable change was neondatabase/autoscaling#571, removing the
postgres_exporter flags `--auto-discover-databases` and
`--exclude-databases=...`
Create Rust bindings for C functions from walproposer. This allows to
write better tests with real walproposer code without spawning multiple
processes and starting up the whole environment.
`make walproposer-lib` stage was added to build static libraries
`libwalproposer.a`, `libpgport.a`, `libpgcommon.a`. These libraries can
be statically linked to any executable to call walproposer functions.
`libs/walproposer/src/walproposer.rs` contains
`test_simple_sync_safekeepers` to test that walproposer can be called
from Rust to emulate sync_safekeepers logic. It can also be used as a
usage example.
## Problem
- Because we compress artifacts file by file, we don't need to put them
into `tar` containers (ie instead of `tar.gz` we can use just `gz`).
- Pythons gz single-threaded and pretty slow.
A benchmark has shown ~20 times speedup (19.876176291 vs
0.8748335830000009) on my laptop (for a pageserver.log size is 1.3M)
## Summary of changes
- Replace tarfile with zstandart
- Update allure to 2.24.0
