## Problem
The docker compose test script (`docker_compose_test.sh`) had
inconsistent codestyle, mixing legacy syntax with modern approaches and
not following best practices at all. This inconsistency could lead to
potential issues with variable expansion, path handling, and
maintainability.
## Summary of changes
This PR modernizes the test script with several codestyle improvements:
* Variable scoping and exports:
* Added proper export declarations for environment variables
* Added explicit COMPOSE_PROFILES export to avoid repetitive flags
* Modern Bash syntax:
* Replaced [ ] with [[ ]] for safer conditional testing
* Used arithmetic operations (( cnt += 3 )) instead of expr
* Added proper variable expansion with braces ${variable}
* Added proper quoting around variables and paths with "${variable}"
* Docker Compose commands:
* Replaced hardcoded container names with service names
* Used docker compose exec instead of docker exec $CONTAINER_NAME
* Removed repetitive flags by using environment variables
* Shell script best practices:
* Added function keyword before function definition
* Used safer path handling with "$(dirname "${0}")"
These changes make the script more maintainable, less error-prone, and
more consistent with modern shell scripting standards.
These various hacks were needed for the forward compatibility tests.
Enough time has passed since the merge that these are no longer needed.
Signed-off-by: Tristan Partin <tristan@neon.tech>
Previously, the structure of the spec file was just the compute spec.
However, the response from the control plane get spec request included
the compute spec and the compute_ctl config. This divergence was
hindering other work such as adding regression tests for compute_ctl
HTTP authorization.
Signed-off-by: Tristan Partin <tristan@neon.tech>
## Problem
Some extensions do not contain tests, which can be easily run on top of
docker-compose or staging.
## Summary of changes
Added the pg_regress based tests for `pg_tiktoken`, `pgx_ulid`, `pg_rag`
Now they will be run on top of docker-compose, but I intend to adopt
them to be run on top staging in the next PRs
## Problem
Docker Hub has new rate limits coming up, and to avoid problems coming
with those we're switching to GHCR.
## Summary of changes
- Push images to GHCR initially and distribute them from there
- Use images from GHCR in docker-compose
## Problem
We have not synced `force-test-extensions-upgrade.yml` with the last
changes.
The variable `TEST_EXTENSIONS_UPGRADE` was ignored in the script and
actually set to `NEW_COMPUTE_TAG` while it should be set to
`OLD_COMPUTE_TAG` as we are about to run compatibility tests.
## Summary of changes
The tag names were synced, the logic was fixed.
## Problem
CI does not pass for the compute release due to the absence of some
images
## Summary of changes
Now we use the images from the old non-compute releases for non-compute
images
## Problem
We created extensions in a single database. The tests could interfere,
i.e., discover some service tables left by other extensions and produce
unexpected results.
## Summary of changes
The tests are now run in a separate timeline, so only one extension owns
the database, which prevents interference.
## Problem
Release CI is slow, because we're doing unnecessary work, for example
building compute images on storage releases and vice versa.
## Summary of changes
- Extract tag generation into reusable workflow and extend it with
fetching of previous component releases
- Don't build neon images on compute releases and don't build compute
images on proxy and storage releases
- Reuse images from previous releases for tests on branches where we
don't build those images
## Open questions
- We differentiate between `TAG` and `COMPUTE_TAG` in a few places, but
we don't differentiate between storage and proxy releases. Since they
use the same image, this will continue to work, but I'm not sure this is
what we want.
