Service targeted for storing and retrieving LFC prewarm data.
Can be used for proxying S3 access for Postgres extensions like
pg_mooncake as well.
Requests must include a Bearer JWT token.
Token is validated using a pemfile (should be passed in infra/).
Note: app is not tolerant to extra trailing slashes, see app.rs
`delete_prefix` test for comments.
Resolves: https://github.com/neondatabase/cloud/issues/26342
Unrelated changes: gate a `rename_noreplace` feature and disable it in
`remote_storage` so as `object_storage` can be built with musl
Migrates the remaining crates to edition 2024. We like to stay on the
latest edition if possible. There is no functional changes, however some
code changes had to be done to accommodate the edition's breaking
changes.
Like the previous migration PRs, this is comprised of three commits:
* the first does the edition update and makes `cargo check`/`cargo
clippy` pass. we had to update bindgen to make its output [satisfy the
requirements of edition
2024](https://doc.rust-lang.org/edition-guide/rust-2024/unsafe-extern.html)
* the second commit does a `cargo fmt` for the new style edition.
* the third commit reorders imports as a one-off change. As before, it
is entirely optional.
Part of #10918
fixes https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/7790 (duplicating most
of the issue description here for posterity)
# Background
From the time before always-authoritative `index_part.json`, we had to
handle duplicate layers. See the RFC for an illustration of how
duplicate layers could happen:
a8e6d259cb/docs/rfcs/027-crash-consistent-layer-map-through-index-part.md (L41-L50)
As of #5198 , we should not be exposed to that problem anymore.
# Problem 1
We still have
1. [code in
Pageserver](82960b2175/pageserver/src/tenant/timeline.rs (L4502-L4521))
than handles duplicate layers
2. [tests in the test
suite](d9dcbffac3/test_runner/regress/test_duplicate_layers.py (L15))
that demonstrates the problem using a failpoint
However, the test in the test suite doesn't use the failpoint to induce
a crash that could legitimately happen in production.
What is does instead is to return early with an `Ok()`, so that the code
in Pageserver that handles duplicate layers (item 1) actually gets
exercised.
That "return early" would be a bug in the routine if it happened in
production.
So, the tests in the test suite are tests for their own sake, but don't
serve to actually regress-test any production behavior.
# Problem 2
Further, if production code _did_ (it nowawdays doesn't!) create a
duplicate layer, the code in Pageserver that handles the condition (item
1 above) is too little and too late:
* the code handles it by discarding the newer `struct Layer`; that's
good.
* however, on disk, we have already overwritten the old with the new
layer file
* the fact that we do it atomically doesn't matter because ...
* if the new layer file is not bit-identical, then we have a cache
coherency problem
* PS PageCache block cache: caches old bit battern
* blob_io offsets stored in variables, based on pre-overwrite bit
pattern / offsets
* => reading based on these offsets from the new file might yield
different data than before
# Solution
- Remove the test suite code pertaining to Problem 1
- Move & rename test suite code that actually tests RFC-27
crash-consistent layer map.
- Remove the Pageserver code that handles duplicate layers too late
(Problem 1)
- Use `RENAME_NOREPLACE` to prevent over-rename the file during
`.finish()`, bail with an error if it happens (Problem 2)
- This bailing prevents the caller from even trying to insert into the
layer map, as they don't even get a `struct Layer` at hand.
- Add `abort`s in the place where we have the layer map lock and check
for duplicates (Problem 2)
- Note again, we can't reach there because we bail from `.finish()` much
earlier in the code.
- Share the logic to clean up after failed `.finish()` between image
layers and delta layers (drive-by cleanup)
- This exposed that test `image_layer_rewrite` was overwriting layer
files in place. Fix the test.
# Future Work
This PR adds a new failure scenario that was previously "papered over"
by the overwriting of layers:
1. Start a compaction that will produce 3 layers: A, B, C
2. Layer A is `finish()`ed successfully.
3. Layer B fails mid-way at some `put_value()`.
4. Compaction bails out, sleeps 20s.
5. Some disk space gets freed in the meantime.
6. Compaction wakes from sleep, another iteration starts, it attempts to
write Layer A again. But the `.finish()` **fails because A already
exists on disk**.
The failure in step 5 is new with this PR, and it **causes the
compaction to get stuck**.
Before, it would silently overwrite the file and "successfully" complete
the second iteration.
The mitigation for this is to `/reset` the tenant.
