## Problem
Running test_pageserver_restarts_under_workload in POR #7275 I get the
following assertion failure in prefetch:
```
#5 0x00005587220d4bf0 in ExceptionalCondition (
conditionName=0x7fbf24d003c8 "(ring_index) < MyPState->ring_unused && (ring_index) >= MyPState->ring_last",
fileName=0x7fbf24d00240 "/home/knizhnik/neon.main//pgxn/neon/pagestore_smgr.c", lineNumber=644)
at /home/knizhnik/neon.main//vendor/postgres-v16/src/backend/utils/error/assert.c:66
#6 0x00007fbf24cebc9b in prefetch_set_unused (ring_index=1509) at /home/knizhnik/neon.main//pgxn/neon/pagestore_smgr.c:644
#7 0x00007fbf24cec613 in prefetch_register_buffer (tag=..., force_latest=0x0, force_lsn=0x0)
at /home/knizhnik/neon.main//pgxn/neon/pagestore_smgr.c:891
#8 0x00007fbf24cef21e in neon_prefetch (reln=0x5587233b7388, forknum=MAIN_FORKNUM, blocknum=14110)
at /home/knizhnik/neon.main//pgxn/neon/pagestore_smgr.c:2055
(gdb) p ring_index
$1 = 1509
(gdb) p MyPState->ring_unused
$2 = 1636
(gdb) p MyPState->ring_last
$3 = 1636
```
## Summary of changes
Check status of `prefetch_wait_for`
## Checklist before requesting a review
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code.
- [ ] If it is a core feature, I have added thorough tests.
- [ ] Do we need to implement analytics? if so did you add the relevant
metrics to the dashboard?
- [ ] If this PR requires public announcement, mark it with
/release-notes label and add several sentences in this section.
## Checklist before merging
- [ ] Do not forget to reformat commit message to not include the above
checklist
---------
Co-authored-by: Konstantin Knizhnik <knizhnik@neon.tech>
## Problem
See https://github.com/neondatabase/cloud/issues/11559
If we have multiple shards, we need to reset connections to all shards
involved in prefetch (having active prefetch requests) if connection
with any of them is lost.
## Summary of changes
In `prefetch_on_ps_disconnect` drop connection to all shards with active
page requests.
## Checklist before requesting a review
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code.
- [ ] If it is a core feature, I have added thorough tests.
- [ ] Do we need to implement analytics? if so did you add the relevant
metrics to the dashboard?
- [ ] If this PR requires public announcement, mark it with
/release-notes label and add several sentences in this section.
## Checklist before merging
- [ ] Do not forget to reformat commit message to not include the above
checklist
Co-authored-by: Konstantin Knizhnik <knizhnik@neon.tech>
Add shard_number to PageserverFeedback and parse it on the compute side.
When compute receives a new ps_feedback, it calculates min LSNs among
feedbacks from all shards, and uses those LSNs for backpressure.
Add `test_sharding_backpressure` to verify that backpressure slows down
compute to wait for the slowest shard.
The walproposer pretends to be a walsender in many ways. It has a
WalSnd slot, it claims to be a walsender by calling
MarkPostmasterChildWalSender() etc. But one different to real
walsenders was that the postmaster still treated it as a bgworker
rather than a walsender. The difference is that at shutdown,
walsenders are not killed until the very end, after the checkpointer
process has written the shutdown checkpoint and exited.
As a result, the walproposer always got killed before the shutdown
checkpoint was written, so the shutdown checkpoint never made it to
safekeepers. That's fine in principle, we don't require a clean
shutdown after all. But it also feels a bit silly not to stream the
shutdown checkpoint. It could be useful for initializing hot standby
mode in a read replica, for example.
Change postmaster to treat background workers that have called
MarkPostmasterChildWalSender() as walsenders. That unfortunately
requires another small change in postgres core.
After doing that, walproposers stay alive longer. However, it also
means that the checkpointer will wait for the walproposer to switch to
WALSNDSTATE_STOPPING state, when the checkpointer sends the
PROCSIG_WALSND_INIT_STOPPING signal. We don't have the machinery in
walproposer to receive and handle that signal reliably. Instead, we
mark walproposer as being in WALSNDSTATE_STOPPING always.
In commit 568f91420a, I assumed that shutdown will wait for all the
remaining WAL to be streamed to safekeepers, but before this commit
that was not true, and the test became flaky. This should make it
stable again.
Some tests wrongly assumed that no WAL could have been written between
pg_current_wal_flush_lsn and quick pg stop after it. Fix them by introducing
flush_ep_to_pageserver which first stops the endpoint and then waits till all
committed WAL reaches the pageserver.
In passing extract safekeeper http client to its own module.
## Problem
Returning from PG_TRY is a bug, and we currently do that
## Summary of changes
Make it break and then return false. This should also help stabilize
test_bad_connection.py
## Problem
When we start compute with newer version of extension (i.e. 1.2) and
then rollback the release, downgrading the compute version, next compute
start will try to update extension to the latest version available in
neon.control (i.e. 1.1).
Thus we need to provide downgrade scripts like neon--1.2--1.1.sql
These scripts must revert the changes made by the upgrade scripts in the
reverse order. This is necessary to ensure that the next upgrade will
work correctly.
In general, we need to write upgrade and downgrade scripts to be more
robust and add IF EXISTS / CREATE OR REPLACE clauses to all statements
(where applicable).
## Summary of changes
Adds downgrade scripts.
Adds test cases for extension downgrade/upgrade.
fixes#7066
This is a follow-up for
https://app.incident.io/neondb/incidents/167?tab=follow-ups
Signed-off-by: Alex Chi Z <chi@neon.tech>
Co-authored-by: Alex Chi Z <iskyzh@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Anastasia Lubennikova <anastasia@neon.tech>
## Problem
ref https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/6188
## Summary of changes
This pull request fixes `-Wmissing-prototypes` for the neon extension.
Note that (1) the gcc version in CI and macOS is different, therefore
some of the warning does not get reported when developing the neon
extension locally. (2) the CI env variable `COPT = -Werror` does not get
passed into the docker build process, therefore warnings are not treated
as errors on CI.
e62baa9704/.github/workflows/build_and_test.yml (L22)
There will be follow-up pull requests on solving other warnings. By the
way, I did not figure out the default compile parameters in the CI env,
and therefore this pull request is tested by manually adding
`-Wmissing-prototypes` into the `COPT`.
Signed-off-by: Alex Chi Z <chi@neon.tech>
## Summary of changes
Calculate number of unique page accesses at compute.
It can be used to estimate working set size and adjust cache size
(shared_buffers or local file cache).
Approximation is made using HyperLogLog algorithm.
It is performed by local file cache and so is available only when local
file cache is enabled.
This calculation doesn't take in account access to the pages present in
shared buffers, but includes pages available in local file cache.
This information can be retrieved using
approximate_working_set_size(reset bool) function from neon extension.
reset parameter can be used to reset statistic and so collect unique
accesses for the particular interval.
Below is an example of estimating working set size after pgbench -c 10
-S -T 100 -s 10:
```
postgres=# select approximate_working_set_size(false);
approximate_working_set_size
------------------------------
19052
(1 row)
postgres=# select pg_table_size('pgbench_accounts')/8192;
?column?
----------
16402
(1 row)
```
## Checklist before requesting a review
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code.
- [ ] If it is a core feature, I have added thorough tests.
- [ ] Do we need to implement analytics? if so did you add the relevant
metrics to the dashboard?
- [ ] If this PR requires public announcement, mark it with
/release-notes label and add several sentences in this section.
## Checklist before merging
- [ ] Do not forget to reformat commit message to not include the above
checklist
---------
Co-authored-by: Konstantin Knizhnik <knizhnik@neon.tech>
## Problem
LFC has high impact on Neon application performance but there is no way
for user to check efficiency of its usage
## Summary of changes
Show LFC statistic in EXPLAIN ANALYZE
## Description
**Local file cache (LFC)**
A layer of caching that stores frequently accessed data from the storage
layer in the local memory of the Neon compute instance. This cache helps
to reduce latency and improve query performance by minimizing the need
to fetch data from the storage layer repeatedly.
**Externalization of LFC in explain output**
Then EXPLAIN ANALYZE output is extended to display important counts for
local file cache (LFC) hits and misses.
This works both, for EXPLAIN text and json output.
**File cache: hits**
Whenever the Postgres backend retrieves a page/block from SGMR, it is
not found in shared buffer but the page is already found in the LFC this
counter is incremented.
**File cache: misses**
Whenever the Postgres backend retrieves a page/block from SGMR, it is
not found in shared buffer and also not in then LFC but the page is
retrieved from Neon storage (page server) this counter is incremented.
Example (for explain text output)
```sql
explain (analyze,buffers,prefetch,filecache) select count(*) from pgbench_accounts;
QUERY PLAN
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Finalize Aggregate (cost=214486.94..214486.95 rows=1 width=8) (actual time=5195.378..5196.034 rows=1 loops=1)
Buffers: shared hit=178875 read=143691 dirtied=128597 written=127346
Prefetch: hits=0 misses=1865 expired=0 duplicates=0
File cache: hits=141826 misses=1865
-> Gather (cost=214486.73..214486.94 rows=2 width=8) (actual time=5195.366..5196.025 rows=3 loops=1)
Workers Planned: 2
Workers Launched: 2
Buffers: shared hit=178875 read=143691 dirtied=128597 written=127346
Prefetch: hits=0 misses=1865 expired=0 duplicates=0
File cache: hits=141826 misses=1865
-> Partial Aggregate (cost=213486.73..213486.74 rows=1 width=8) (actual time=5187.670..5187.670 rows=1 loops=3)
Buffers: shared hit=178875 read=143691 dirtied=128597 written=127346
Prefetch: hits=0 misses=1865 expired=0 duplicates=0
File cache: hits=141826 misses=1865
-> Parallel Index Only Scan using pgbench_accounts_pkey on pgbench_accounts (cost=0.43..203003.02 rows=4193481 width=0) (actual time=0.574..4928.995 rows=3333333 loops=3)
Heap Fetches: 3675286
Buffers: shared hit=178875 read=143691 dirtied=128597 written=127346
Prefetch: hits=0 misses=1865 expired=0 duplicates=0
File cache: hits=141826 misses=1865
```
The json output uses the following keys and provides integer values for
those keys:
```
...
"File Cache Hits": 141826,
"File Cache Misses": 1865
...
```
## Checklist before requesting a review
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code.
- [ ] If it is a core feature, I have added thorough tests.
- [ ] Do we need to implement analytics? if so did you add the relevant
metrics to the dashboard?
- [ ] If this PR requires public announcement, mark it with
/release-notes label and add several sentences in this section.
## Checklist before merging
- [ ] Do not forget to reformat commit message to not include the above
checklist
---------
Co-authored-by: Konstantin Knizhnik <knizhnik@neon.tech>
## Problem
Customers should be able to determine the size of their workload's
working set to right size their compute.
Since Neon uses Local file cache (LFC) instead of shared buffers on
bigger compute nodes to cache pages we need to externalize a means to
determine LFC hit ratio in addition to shared buffer hit ratio.
Currently the following end user documentation
fb7cd3af0e/content/docs/manage/endpoints.md (L137)
is wrong because it describes how to right size a compute node based on
shared buffer hit ratio.
Note that the existing functionality in extension "neon" is NOT
available to end users but only to superuser / cloud_admin.
## Summary of changes
- externalize functions and views in neon extension to end users
- introduce a new view `NEON_STAT_FILE_CACHE` with the following DDL
```sql
CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW NEON_STAT_FILE_CACHE AS
WITH lfc_stats AS (
SELECT
stat_name,
count
FROM neon_get_lfc_stats() AS t(stat_name text, count bigint)
),
lfc_values AS (
SELECT
MAX(CASE WHEN stat_name = 'file_cache_misses' THEN count ELSE NULL END) AS file_cache_misses,
MAX(CASE WHEN stat_name = 'file_cache_hits' THEN count ELSE NULL END) AS file_cache_hits,
MAX(CASE WHEN stat_name = 'file_cache_used' THEN count ELSE NULL END) AS file_cache_used,
MAX(CASE WHEN stat_name = 'file_cache_writes' THEN count ELSE NULL END) AS file_cache_writes,
-- Calculate the file_cache_hit_ratio within the same CTE for simplicity
CASE
WHEN MAX(CASE WHEN stat_name = 'file_cache_misses' THEN count ELSE 0 END) + MAX(CASE WHEN stat_name = 'file_cache_hits' THEN count ELSE 0 END) = 0 THEN NULL
ELSE ROUND((MAX(CASE WHEN stat_name = 'file_cache_hits' THEN count ELSE 0 END)::DECIMAL /
(MAX(CASE WHEN stat_name = 'file_cache_hits' THEN count ELSE 0 END) + MAX(CASE WHEN stat_name = 'file_cache_misses' THEN count ELSE 0 END))) * 100, 2)
END AS file_cache_hit_ratio
FROM lfc_stats
)
SELECT file_cache_misses, file_cache_hits, file_cache_used, file_cache_writes, file_cache_hit_ratio from lfc_values;
```
This view can be used by an end user as follows:
```sql
CREATE EXTENSION NEON;
SELECT * from neon. NEON_STAT_FILE_CACHE"
```
The output looks like the following:
```
select * from NEON_STAT_FILE_CACHE;
file_cache_misses | file_cache_hits | file_cache_used | file_cache_writes | file_cache_hit_ratio
-------------------+-----------------+-----------------+-------------------+----------------------
2133643 | 108999742 | 607 | 10767410 | 98.08
(1 row)
```
## Checklist before requesting a review
- [x ] I have performed a self-review of my code.
- [x ] If it is a core feature, I have added thorough tests.
- [ ] Do we need to implement analytics? if so did you add the relevant
metrics to the dashboard?
- [x ] If this PR requires public announcement, mark it with
/release-notes label and add several sentences in this section.
## Checklist before merging
- [ ] Do not forget to reformat commit message to not include the above
checklist
We set it for neon replica, if primary is running.
Postgres uses this GUC at the start,
to determine if replica should wait for
RUNNING_XACTS from primary or not.
Corresponding cloud PR is
https://github.com/neondatabase/cloud/pull/10183
* Add test hot-standby replica startup.
* Extract oldest_running_xid from XlRunningXits WAL records.
---------
Co-authored-by: Konstantin Knizhnik <knizhnik@neon.tech>
Co-authored-by: Konstantin Knizhnik <knizhnik@garret.ru>
Co-authored-by: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki@neon.tech>
PR #6655 turned out to be not enough to prevent .snap files bloat; some
subscribers just don't ack flushed position, thus never advancing the
slot. Probably other bloating scenarios are also possible, so add a more direct
restriction -- drop all slots if too many .snap files has been discovered.
curl_global_init() with an IPv6 enabled curl build on macOS will cause
the calling program to become multithreaded. Unfortunately for
shared_preload_libraries, that means the postmaster becomes
multithreaded, which CANNOT happen. There are checks in Postgres to make
sure that this is not the case.
## Problem
Building on #5875 to add handy test functions for autoscaling.
Resolves#5609
## Summary of changes
This PR makes the following changes to #5875:
- Enable `neon_test_utils` extension in the compute node docker image,
so we could use it in the e2e tests (as discussed with @kelvich).
- Removed test functions related to disk as we don't use them for
autoscaling.
- Fix the warning with printf-ing unsigned long variables.
---------
Co-authored-by: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki@neon.tech>
## Problem
See https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/6674
Current implementation of `neon_redo_read_buffer_filter` performs fast
exist for catalog pages:
```
/*
* Out of an abundance of caution, we always run redo on shared catalogs,
* regardless of whether the block is stored in shared buffers. See also
* this function's top comment.
*/
if (!OidIsValid(NInfoGetDbOid(rinfo)))
return false;
*/
as a result last written lsn and relation size for FSM fork are not correctly updated for catalog relations.
## Summary of changes
Do not perform fast path return for catalog relations.
## Checklist before requesting a review
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code.
- [ ] If it is a core feature, I have added thorough tests.
- [ ] Do we need to implement analytics? if so did you add the relevant metrics to the dashboard?
- [ ] If this PR requires public announcement, mark it with /release-notes label and add several sentences in this section.
## Checklist before merging
- [ ] Do not forget to reformat commit message to not include the above checklist
Co-authored-by: Konstantin Knizhnik <knizhnik@neon.tech>
This PR contains the first version of a
[FoundationDB-like](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4fFDFbi3toc)
simulation testing for safekeeper and walproposer.
### desim
This is a core "framework" for running determenistic simulation. It
operates on threads, allowing to test syncronous code (like walproposer).
`libs/desim/src/executor.rs` contains implementation of a determenistic
thread execution. This is achieved by blocking all threads, and each
time allowing only a single thread to make an execution step. All
executor's threads are blocked using `yield_me(after_ms)` function. This
function is called when a thread wants to sleep or wait for an external
notification (like blocking on a channel until it has a ready message).
`libs/desim/src/chan.rs` contains implementation of a channel (basic
sync primitive). It has unlimited capacity and any thread can push or
read messages to/from it.
`libs/desim/src/network.rs` has a very naive implementation of a network
(only reliable TCP-like connections are supported for now), that can
have arbitrary delays for each package and failure injections for
breaking connections with some probability.
`libs/desim/src/world.rs` ties everything together, to have a concept of
virtual nodes that can have network connections between them.
### walproposer_sim
Has everything to run walproposer and safekeepers in a simulation.
`safekeeper.rs` reimplements all necesary stuff from `receive_wal.rs`,
`send_wal.rs` and `timelines_global_map.rs`.
`walproposer_api.rs` implements all walproposer callback to use
simulation library.
`simulation.rs` defines a schedule – a set of events like `restart <sk>`
or `write_wal` that should happen at time `<ts>`. It also has code to
spawn walproposer/safekeeper threads and provide config to them.
### tests
`simple_test.rs` has tests that just start walproposer and 3 safekeepers
together in a simulation, and tests that they are not crashing right
away.
`misc_test.rs` has tests checking more advanced simulation cases, like
crashing or restarting threads, testing memory deallocation, etc.
`random_test.rs` is the main test, it checks thousands of random seeds
(schedules) for correctness. It roughly corresponds to running a real
python integration test in an environment with very unstable network and
cpu, but in a determenistic way (each seed results in the same execution
log) and much much faster.
Closes#547
---------
Co-authored-by: Arseny Sher <sher-ars@yandex.ru>
## Problem
test_lfc_resize sometimes filed with assertion failure when require lock
in write operation:
```
if (lfc_ctl->generation == generation)
{
Assert(LFC_ENABLED());
```
## Summary of changes
Increment generation when 0 is assigned to neon.file_cache_size_limit
## Checklist before requesting a review
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code.
- [ ] If it is a core feature, I have added thorough tests.
- [ ] Do we need to implement analytics? if so did you add the relevant
metrics to the dashboard?
- [ ] If this PR requires public announcement, mark it with
/release-notes label and add several sentences in this section.
## Checklist before merging
- [ ] Do not forget to reformat commit message to not include the above
checklist
Co-authored-by: Konstantin Knizhnik <knizhnik@neon.tech>
## Problem
See #6626
If there is inactive replication slot then Postgres will not bw able to
shrink WAL and delete unused snapshots.
If she other active subscription is present, then snapshots created each
15 seconds will overflow AUX_DIR.
Setting `max_slot_wal_keep_size` doesn't solve the problem, because even
small WAL segment will be enough to overflow AUX_DIR if there is no
other activity on the system.
## Summary of changes
If there are active subscriptions and some logical replication slots are
not used during `neon.logical_replication_max_time_lag` interval, then
unused slot is dropped.
## Checklist before requesting a review
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code.
- [ ] If it is a core feature, I have added thorough tests.
- [ ] Do we need to implement analytics? if so did you add the relevant
metrics to the dashboard?
- [ ] If this PR requires public announcement, mark it with
/release-notes label and add several sentences in this section.
## Checklist before merging
- [ ] Do not forget to reformat commit message to not include the above
checklist
Co-authored-by: Konstantin Knizhnik <knizhnik@neon.tech>
I was getting an error:
/home/heikki/git-sandbox/neon//pgxn/neon_walredo/walredoproc.c:161:5: error: conflicting types for ‘close_range’; have ‘int(unsigned int, unsigned int, unsigned int)’
161 | int close_range(unsigned int start_fd, unsigned int count, unsigned int flags) {
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/bits/sigstksz.h:24,
from /usr/include/signal.h:328,
from /home/heikki/git-sandbox/neon//pgxn/neon_walredo/walredoproc.c:50:
/usr/include/unistd.h:1208:12: note: previous declaration of ‘close_range’ with type ‘int(unsigned int, unsigned int, int)’
1208 | extern int close_range (unsigned int __fd, unsigned int __max_fd,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
The discrepancy is in the 3rd argument. Apparently in the glibc
wrapper it's signed.
As a quick fix, rename our close_range() function, the one that calls
syscall() directly, to avoid the clash with the glibc wrapper. In the
long term, an autoconf test would be nice, and some equivalent on
macOS, see issue #6580.
The issue is still unsolved because of shmem size in VMs. Need to figure it out before applying this patch.
For more details:
```
ERROR: could not resize shared memory segment "/PostgreSQL.2892504480" to 16774205952 bytes: No space left on device
```
As an example, the same issue in community pgvector/pgvector#453.
This includes a compatibility patch that is needed because pgvector
now skips WAL-logging during the index build, and WAL-logs the index
only in one go at the end. That's how GIN, GiST and SP-GIST index
builds work in core PostgreSQL too, but we need some Neon-specific
calls to mark the beginning and end of those build phases.
pgvector is the first index AM that does that with parallel workers,
so I had to modify those functions in the Neon extension to be aware
of parallel workers. Only the leader needs to create the underlying
file and perform the WAL-logging. (In principle, the parallel workers
could participate in the WAL-logging too, but pgvector doesn't do
that. This will need some further work if that changes).
The previous attempt at this (#6592) missed that parallel workers
needed those changes, and segfaulted in parallel build that spilled to
disk.
Testing
-------
We don't have a place for regression tests of extensions at the
moment. I tested this manually with the following script:
```
CREATE EXTENSION IF NOT EXISTS vector;
DROP TABLE IF EXISTS tst;
CREATE TABLE tst (i serial, v vector(3));
INSERT INTO tst (v) SELECT ARRAY[random(), random(), random()] FROM generate_series(1, 15000) g;
-- Serial build, in memory
ALTER TABLE tst SET (parallel_workers=0);
SET maintenance_work_mem='50 MB';
CREATE INDEX idx ON tst USING hnsw (v vector_l2_ops);
-- Test that the index works. (The table contents are random, and the
-- search is approximate anyway, so we cannot check the exact values.
-- For now, just eyeball that they look reasonable)
set enable_seqscan=off;
explain SELECT * FROM tst ORDER BY v <-> ARRAY[0, 0, 0]::vector LIMIT 5;
SELECT * FROM tst ORDER BY v <-> ARRAY[0, 0, 0]::vector LIMIT 5;
DROP INDEX idx;
-- Serial build, spills to on disk
ALTER TABLE tst SET (parallel_workers=0);
SET maintenance_work_mem='5 MB';
CREATE INDEX idx ON tst USING hnsw (v vector_l2_ops);
SELECT * FROM tst ORDER BY v <-> ARRAY[0, 0, 0]::vector LIMIT 5;
DROP INDEX idx;
-- Parallel build, in memory
ALTER TABLE tst SET (parallel_workers=4);
SET maintenance_work_mem='50 MB';
CREATE INDEX idx ON tst USING hnsw (v vector_l2_ops);
SELECT * FROM tst ORDER BY v <-> ARRAY[0, 0, 0]::vector LIMIT 5;
DROP INDEX idx;
-- Parallel build, spills to disk
ALTER TABLE tst SET (parallel_workers=4);
SET maintenance_work_mem='5 MB';
CREATE INDEX idx ON tst USING hnsw (v vector_l2_ops);
SELECT * FROM tst ORDER BY v <-> ARRAY[0, 0, 0]::vector LIMIT 5;
DROP INDEX idx;
```
At the end of ApplyRecord(), we called pfree on the decoded record, if
it was "oversized". However, we had alread linked it to the "decode
queue" list in XLogReaderState. If we later called XLogBeginRead(), it
called ResetDecoder and tried to free the same record again.
The conditions to hit this are:
- a large WAL record (larger than aboue 64 kB I think, per
DEFAULT_DECODE_BUFFER_SIZE), and
- another WAL record processed by the same WAL redo process after the
large one.
I think the reason we haven't seen this earlier is that you don't get
WAL records that large that are sent to the WAL redo process, except
when logical replication is enabled. Logical replication adds data to
the WAL records, making them larger.
To fix, allocate the buffer ourselves, and don't link it to the decode
queue. Alternatively, we could perhaps have just removed the pfree(),
but frankly I'm a bit scared about the whole queue thing.
The rust stdlib uses the efficient `posix_spawn` by default.
However, before this PR, pageserver used `pre_exec()` in our
`close_fds()` ext trait.
This PR moves the work that `close_fds()` did to the walredo C code.
I verified manually using `gdb` that we're now forking out the walredo
process using `posix_spawn`.
refs https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/6565
## Problem
See https://github.com/neondatabase/cloud/issues/8673
## Summary of changes
Download missed SLRU segments from page server
## Checklist before requesting a review
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code.
- [ ] If it is a core feature, I have added thorough tests.
- [ ] Do we need to implement analytics? if so did you add the relevant
metrics to the dashboard?
- [ ] If this PR requires public announcement, mark it with
/release-notes label and add several sentences in this section.
## Checklist before merging
- [ ] Do not forget to reformat commit message to not include the above
checklist
---------
Co-authored-by: Konstantin Knizhnik <knizhnik@neon.tech>
Co-authored-by: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki@neon.tech>
## Problem
See https://neondb.slack.com/archives/C04DGM6SMTM/p1706531433057289
## Summary of changes
1. Do not decrease reconnect timeout until maximal interval value (1
second) is reached
2. Compute reconnect time after connection attempt is taken to exclude
connect time itself from the interval measurement.
So now backend should not perform more than 4 reconnect attempts per
second.
But please notice that backoff is performed locally in each backend and
so if there are many active backends,
then connection (and so error) rate may be much higher.
## Checklist before requesting a review
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code.
- [ ] If it is a core feature, I have added thorough tests.
- [ ] Do we need to implement analytics? if so did you add the relevant
metrics to the dashboard?
- [ ] If this PR requires public announcement, mark it with
/release-notes label and add several sentences in this section.
## Checklist before merging
- [ ] Do not forget to reformat commit message to not include the above
checklist
---------
Co-authored-by: Konstantin Knizhnik <knizhnik@neon.tech>
refer #5508
replaces #5837
## Problem
This PR implements sharding support at compute side. Relations are
splinted in stripes and `get_page` requests are redirected to the
particular shard where stripe is located. All other requests (i.e. get
relation or database size) are always send to shard 0.
## Summary of changes
Support of sharding at compute side include three things:
1. Make it possible to specify and change in runtime connection to more
retain one page server
2. Send `get_page` request to the particular shard (determined by hash
of page key)
3. Support multiple servers in prefetch ring requests
## Checklist before requesting a review
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code.
- [ ] If it is a core feature, I have added thorough tests.
- [ ] Do we need to implement analytics? if so did you add the relevant
metrics to the dashboard?
- [ ] If this PR requires public announcement, mark it with
/release-notes label and add several sentences in this section.
## Checklist before merging
- [ ] Do not forget to reformat commit message to not include the above
checklist
---------
Co-authored-by: Konstantin Knizhnik <knizhnik@neon.tech>
Co-authored-by: John Spray <john@neon.tech>
Co-authored-by: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki@neon.tech>
## Problem
There is "neon.pageserver_connstring" GUC with PGC_SIGHUP option,
allowing to change it using
pg_reload_conf(). It is used by control plane to update pageserver
connection string if page server is crashed,
relocated or new shards are added.
It is copied to shared memory because config can not be loaded during
query execution and we need to
reestablish connection to page server.
## Summary of changes
Copying connection string to shared memory is done by postmaster. And
other backends
should check update counter to determine of connection URL is changed
and connection needs to be reestablished.
We can not use standard Postgres LW-locks, because postmaster has proc
entry and so can not wait
on this primitive. This is why lockless access algorithm is implemented
using two atomic counters to enforce
consistent reading of connection string value from shared memory.
## Checklist before requesting a review
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code.
- [ ] If it is a core feature, I have added thorough tests.
- [ ] Do we need to implement analytics? if so did you add the relevant
metrics to the dashboard?
- [ ] If this PR requires public announcement, mark it with
/release-notes label and add several sentences in this section.
## Checklist before merging
- [ ] Do not forget to reformat commit message to not include the above
checklist
---------
Co-authored-by: Konstantin Knizhnik <knizhnik@neon.tech>
Co-authored-by: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki@neon.tech>
In
7f828890cf
we changed the logic for persisting control_files. Previously it was
updated if `peer_horizon_lsn` jumped more than one segment, which made
`peer_horizon_lsn` initialized on disk as soon as safekeeper has
received a first `AppendRequest`.
This caused an issue with `truncateLsn`, which now can be zero
sometimes. This PR fixes it, and now `truncateLsn/peer_horizon_lsn` can
never be zero once we know `timeline_start_lsn`.
Closes https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/6248
## Problem
Use [NEON_SMGR] for all log messages produced by neon extension.
## Summary of changes
## Checklist before requesting a review
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code.
- [ ] If it is a core feature, I have added thorough tests.
- [ ] Do we need to implement analytics? if so did you add the relevant
metrics to the dashboard?
- [ ] If this PR requires public announcement, mark it with
/release-notes label and add several sentences in this section.
## Checklist before merging
- [ ] Do not forget to reformat commit message to not include the above
checklist
---------
Co-authored-by: Konstantin Knizhnik <knizhnik@neon.tech>
## Problem
Currently relation hash size is limited by "neon.relsize_hash_size" GUC
with default value 64k.
64k relations is not so small number... but it is enough to create 376
databases to exhaust it.
## Summary of changes
Use LRU replacement algorithm to prevent hash overflow
## Checklist before requesting a review
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code.
- [ ] If it is a core feature, I have added thorough tests.
- [ ] Do we need to implement analytics? if so did you add the relevant
metrics to the dashboard?
- [ ] If this PR requires public announcement, mark it with
/release-notes label and add several sentences in this section.
## Checklist before merging
- [ ] Do not forget to reformat commit message to not include the above
checklist
---------
Co-authored-by: Konstantin Knizhnik <knizhnik@neon.tech>
It has caveats such as creating half empty segment which can't be
offloaded. Instead we'll pursue approach of pull_timeline, seeding new state
from some peer.
Remove confirm_wal_streamed; we already apply both write and flush positions of
the slot to commit_lsn which is fine because 1) we need to wake up waiters 2)
committed WAL can be fetched from safekeepers by neon_walreader now.
wp -> sk communication now uses neon_walreader which will fetch missing WAL on
demand from safekeepers, so doesn't need this anymore. Also, cap WAL download by
max_slot_wal_keep_size to be able to start compute if lag is too high.
It is similar to XLogReader, but when either requested segment is missing
locally or requested LSN is before basebackup_lsn NeonWALReader asynchronously
fetches WAL from one of safekeepers.
Patch includes walproposer switch to NeonWALReader, splitting wouldn't make much
sense as it is hard to test otherwise. This finally removes risk of pg_wal
explosion (as well as slow start time) when one safekeeper is lagging, at the
same time allowing to recover it.
In the future reader should also be used by logical walsender for similar
reasons (currently we download the tail on compute start synchronously).
The main test is test_lagging_sk. However, I also run it manually a lot varying
MAX_SEND_SIZE on both sides (on safekeeper and on walproposer), testing various
fragmentations (one side having small buffer, another, both), which brought up
https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/6055
closes https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/1012
## Problem
See https://neondb.slack.com/archives/C026T7K2YP9/p1702813041997959
## Summary of changes
Do not take in account invalidated slots when calculate restart_lsn
position for basebackup at page server
## Checklist before requesting a review
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code.
- [ ] If it is a core feature, I have added thorough tests.
- [ ] Do we need to implement analytics? if so did you add the relevant
metrics to the dashboard?
- [ ] If this PR requires public announcement, mark it with
/release-notes label and add several sentences in this section.
## Checklist before merging
- [ ] Do not forget to reformat commit message to not include the above
checklist
---------
Co-authored-by: Konstantin Knizhnik <knizhnik@neon.tech>
