When `NeonEnv.from_repo_dir` was introduced, storage controller stored
its
state exclusively `attachments.json`.
Since then, it has moved to using Postgres, which stores its state in
`storage_controller_db`.
But `NeonEnv.from_repo_dir` wasn't adjusted to do this.
This PR rectifies the situation.
Context for this is failures in
`test_pageserver_characterize_throughput_with_n_tenants`
CF:
https://neondb.slack.com/archives/C033RQ5SPDH/p1721035799502239?thread_ts=1720901332.293769&cid=C033RQ5SPDH
Notably, `from_repo_dir` is also used by the backwards- and
forwards-compatibility.
Thus, the changes in this PR affect those tests as well.
However, it turns out that the compatibility snapshot already contains
the `storage_controller_db`.
Thus, it should just work and in fact we can remove hacks like
`fixup_storage_controller`.
Follow-ups created as part of this work:
* https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/8399
* https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/8400
## Problem
When generations were new, these messages were an important way of
noticing if something unexpected was going on. We found some real issues
when investigating tests that unexpectedly tripped them.
At time has gone on, this code is now pretty battle-tested, and as we do
more live migrations etc, it's fairly normal to see the occasional
message from a node with a stale generation.
At this point the cognitive load on developers to selectively allow-list
these logs outweighs the benefit of having them at warn severity.
Closes: https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/8080
## Summary of changes
- Downgrade "Dropped remote consistent LSN updates" and "Dropping stale
deletions" messages to INFO
- Remove all the allow-list entries for these logs.
we want to run some specific pagebench test cases on dedicated hardware
to get reproducible results
run1: 1 client per tenant => characterize throughput with n tenants.
- 500 tenants
- scale 13 (200 MB database)
- 1 hour duration
- ca 380 GB layer snapshot files
run2.singleclient: 1 client per tenant => characterize latencies
run2.manyclient: N clients per tenant => characterize throughput
scalability within one tenant.
- 1 tenant with 1 client for latencies
- 1 tenant with 64 clients because typically for a high number of
connections we recommend the connection pooler
which by default uses 64 connections (for scalability)
- scale 136 (2048 MB database)
- 20 minutes each
## Problem
see https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/8070
## Summary of changes
the neon_local subcommands to
- start neon
- start pageserver
- start safekeeper
- start storage controller
get a new option -t=xx or --start-timeout=xx which allows to specify a
longer timeout in seconds we wait for the process start.
This is useful in test cases where the pageserver has to read a lot of
layer data, like in pagebench test cases.
In addition we exploit the new timeout option in the python test
infrastructure (python fixtures) and modify the flaky testcase to
increase the timeout from 10 seconds to 1 minute.
Example from the test execution
```bash
RUST_BACKTRACE=1 NEON_ENV_BUILDER_USE_OVERLAYFS_FOR_SNAPSHOTS=1 DEFAULT_PG_VERSION=15 BUILD_TYPE=release ./scripts/pytest test_runner/performance/pageserver/pagebench/test_pageserver_max_throughput_getpage_at_latest_lsn.py
...
2024-06-19 09:29:34.590 INFO [neon_fixtures.py:1513] Running command "/instance_store/neon/target/release/neon_local storage_controller start --start-timeout=60s"
2024-06-19 09:29:36.365 INFO [broker.py:34] starting storage_broker to listen incoming connections at "127.0.0.1:15001"
2024-06-19 09:29:36.365 INFO [neon_fixtures.py:1513] Running command "/instance_store/neon/target/release/neon_local pageserver start --id=1 --start-timeout=60s"
2024-06-19 09:29:36.366 INFO [neon_fixtures.py:1513] Running command "/instance_store/neon/target/release/neon_local safekeeper start 1 --start-timeout=60s"
```
## Problem
`test_pageserver_max_throughput_getpage_at_latest_lsn` is a pagebench
testcase which creates several tenants/timelines to verify pageserver
performance.
The test swaps environments around in the tenant duplication stage, so
the storage controller uses two separate db instances (one in the
duplication stage and another one in the benchmarking stage).
In the benchmarking stage, the storage controller starts without any
knowledge of nodes, but with knowledge of tenants (via
attachments.json). When we re-attach and attempt to update the scheduler
stats, the scheduler rightfully complains
about the node not being known. The setup should preserve the storage
controller across the two envs, but i think it's fine to just allow list
the error in this case.
## Summary of changes
add the error message
`2024-06-19T09:38:27.866085Z ERROR Scheduler missing node 1``
to the list of allowed errors for storage_controller
## Problem
Testcase page bench test_pageserver_max_throughput_getpage_at_latest_lsn
had been deactivated because it was flaky.
We now ignore copy fail error messages like in
270d3be507/test_runner/regress/test_pageserver_getpage_throttle.py (L17-L20)
and want to reactivate it to see it it is still flaky
## Summary of changes
- reactivate the test in CI
- ignore CopyFail error message during page bench test cases
## Checklist before requesting a review
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code.
- [ ] If it is a core feature, I have added thorough tests.
- [ ] Do we need to implement analytics? if so did you add the relevant
metrics to the dashboard?
- [ ] If this PR requires public announcement, mark it with
/release-notes label and add several sentences in this section.
## Checklist before merging
- [ ] Do not forget to reformat commit message to not include the above
checklist
Not a user-facing change, but can break any existing `.neon` directories
created by neon_local, as the name of the database used by the storage
controller changes.
This PR changes all the locations apart from the path of
`control_plane/attachment_service` (waiting for an opportune moment to
do that one, because it's the most conflict-ish wrt ongoing PRs like
#6676 )
## Problem
The vectored read path proposed in
https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/pull/6576 seems
to be functionally correct, but in my testing (see below) it is about 10-20% slower than the naive
sequential vectored implementation.
## Summary of changes
There's three parts to this PR:
1. Supporting vectored blob reads. This is actually trickier than it
sounds because on disk blobs are prefixed with a variable length size header.
Since the blobs are not necessarily fixed size, we need to juggle the offsets
such that the callers can retrieve the blobs from the resulting buffer.
2. Merge disk read requests issued by the vectored read path up to a
maximum size. Again, the merging is complicated by the fact that blobs
are not fixed size. We keep track of the begin and end offset of each blob
and pass them into the vectored blob reader. In turn, the reader will return
a buffer and the offsets at which the blobs begin and end.
3. A benchmark for basebackup requests against tenant with large SLRU
block counts is added. This required a small change to pagebench and a new config
variable for the pageserver which toggles the vectored get validation.
We can probably optimise things further by adding a little bit of
concurrency for our IO. In principle, it's as simple as spawning a task which deals with issuing
IO and doing the serialisation and handling on the parent task which receives input via a
channel.
## Problem
`test_pageserver_max_throughput_getpage_at_latest_lsn` is flaky which
makes CI status red pretty frequently. `benchmarks` is not a blocking
job (doesn't block `deploy`), so having it red might hide failures in
other jobs
Ref: https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/6724
## Summary of changes
- Disable `test_pageserver_max_throughput_getpage_at_latest_lsn` on CI
until it fixed
