This PR commits the benchmarks I ran to qualify concurrent IO before we
released it.
Changes:
- Add `l0stack` fixture; a reusable abstraction for creating a stack of
L0 deltas
each of which has 1 Value::Delta per page.
- Such a stack of L0 deltas is a good and understandable demo for
concurrent IO
because to reconstruct any page, $layer_stack_height` Values need to be
read.
Before concurrent IO, the reads were sequential.
With concurrent IO, they are executed concurrently.
- So, switch `test_latency` to use the l0stack.
- Teach `pagebench`, which is used by `test_latency`, to limit itself to
the blocks of the relation created by the l0stack abstraction.
- Additional parametrization of `test_latency` over dimensions
`ps_io_concurrency,l0_stack_height,queue_depth`
- Use better names for the tests to reflect what they do, leave
interpretation of the (now quite high-dimensional) results to the reader
- `test_{throughput => postgres_seqscan}`
- `test_{latency => random_reads}`
- Cut down on permutations to those we use in production. Runtime is
about 2min.
Refs
- concurrent IO epic https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/9378
- batching task: fixes https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/9837
---------
Co-authored-by: Peter Bendel <peterbendel@neon.tech>
## Problem
https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/pull/11494 changes the batching
logic, but we don't have a way to evaluate it.
## Summary of changes
This PR introduces a global and per timeline metric which tracks the
reason for
which a batch was broken.
## Problem
Get page batching stops when we encounter requests at different LSNs.
We are leaving batching factor on the table.
## Summary of changes
The goal is to support keys with different LSNs in a single batch and
still serve them with a single vectored get.
Important restriction: the same key at different LSNs is not supported
in one batch. Returning different key
versions is a much more intrusive change.
Firstly, the read path is changed to support "scattered" queries. This
is a conceptually simple step from
https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/pull/11463. Instead of initializing
the fringe for one keyspace,
we do it for multiple at different LSNs and let the logic already
present into the fringe handle selection.
Secondly, page service code is updated to support batching at different
LSNs. Eeach request parsed from the wire determines its effective
request LSN and keeps it in mem for the batcher toinspect. The batcher
allows keys at
different LSNs in one batch as long one key is not requested at
different LSNs.
I'd suggest doing the first pass commit by commit to get a feel for the
changes.
## Results
I used the batching test from [Christian's
PR](https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/pull/11391) which increases the
change of batch breaks. Looking at the logs I think the new code is at
the max batching factor for the workload (we
only break batches due to them being oversized or because the executor
is idle).
```
Main:
Reasons for stopping batching: {'LSN changed': 22843, 'of batch size': 33417}
test_throughput[release-pg16-50-pipelining_config0-30-100-128-batchable {'max_batch_size': 32, 'execution': 'concurrent-futures', 'mode': 'pipelined'}].perfmetric.batching_factor: 14.6662
My branch:
Reasons for stopping batching: {'of batch size': 37024}
test_throughput[release-pg16-50-pipelining_config0-30-100-128-batchable {'max_batch_size': 32, 'execution': 'concurrent-futures', 'mode': 'pipelined'}].perfmetric.batching_factor: 19.8333
```
Related: https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/10765
The batching perf test workload is currently read-only sequential scans.
However, realistic workloads have concurrent writes (to other pages)
going on.
This PR simulates concurrent writes to other pages by emitting logical
replication messages.
These degrade the achieved batching factor, for the reason see
- https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/10765
PR
- https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/pull/11494
will fix this problem and get batching factor back up.
---------
Co-authored-by: Vlad Lazar <vlad@neon.tech>
## Problem
```
2024-12-03T15:42:46.5978335Z + poetry run python /__w/neon/neon/scripts/ingest_perf_test_result.py --ingest /__w/neon/neon/test_runner/perf-report-local
2024-12-03T15:42:49.5325077Z Traceback (most recent call last):
2024-12-03T15:42:49.5325603Z File "/__w/neon/neon/scripts/ingest_perf_test_result.py", line 165, in <module>
2024-12-03T15:42:49.5326029Z main()
2024-12-03T15:42:49.5326316Z File "/__w/neon/neon/scripts/ingest_perf_test_result.py", line 155, in main
2024-12-03T15:42:49.5326739Z ingested = ingest_perf_test_result(cur, item, recorded_at_timestamp)
2024-12-03T15:42:49.5327488Z ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
2024-12-03T15:42:49.5327914Z File "/__w/neon/neon/scripts/ingest_perf_test_result.py", line 99, in ingest_perf_test_result
2024-12-03T15:42:49.5328321Z psycopg2.extras.execute_values(
2024-12-03T15:42:49.5328940Z File "/github/home/.cache/pypoetry/virtualenvs/non-package-mode-_pxWMzVK-py3.11/lib/python3.11/site-packages/psycopg2/extras.py", line 1299, in execute_values
2024-12-03T15:42:49.5335618Z cur.execute(b''.join(parts))
2024-12-03T15:42:49.5335967Z psycopg2.errors.InvalidTextRepresentation: invalid input syntax for type numeric: "concurrent-futures"
2024-12-03T15:42:49.5336287Z LINE 57: 'concurrent-futures',
2024-12-03T15:42:49.5336462Z ^
```
## Summary of changes
- `test_page_service_batching`: save non-numeric params as `labels`
- Add a runtime check that `metric_value` is NUMERIC
This PR
- fixes smgr metrics https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/9925
- adds an additional startup log line logging the current batching
config
- adds a histogram of batch sizes global and per-tenant
- adds a metric exposing the current batching config
The issue described #9925 is that before this PR, request latency was
only observed *after* batching.
This means that smgr latency metrics (most importantly getpage latency)
don't account for
- `wait_lsn` time
- time spent waiting for batch to fill up / the executor stage to pick
up the batch.
The fix is to use a per-request batching timer, like we did before the
initial batching PR.
We funnel those timers through the entire request lifecycle.
I noticed that even before the initial batching changes, we weren't
accounting for the time spent writing & flushing the response to the
wire.
This PR drive-by fixes that deficiency by dropping the timers at the
very end of processing the batch, i.e., after the `pgb.flush()` call.
I was **unable to maintain the behavior that we deduct
time-spent-in-throttle from various latency metrics.
The reason is that we're using a *single* counter in `RequestContext` to
track micros spent in throttle.
But there are *N* metrics timers in the batch, one per request.
As a consequence, the practice of consuming the counter in the drop
handler of each timer no longer works because all but the first timer
will encounter error `close() called on closed state`.
A failed attempt to maintain the current behavior can be found in
https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/pull/9951.
So, this PR remvoes the deduction behavior from all metrics.
I started a discussion on Slack about it the implications this has for
our internal SLO calculation:
https://neondb.slack.com/archives/C033RQ5SPDH/p1732910861704029
# Refs
- fixes https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/9925
- sub-issue https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/9377
- epic: https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/9376
# Problem
The timeout-based batching adds latency to unbatchable workloads.
We can choose a short batching timeout (e.g. 10us) but that requires
high-resolution timers, which tokio doesn't have.
I thoroughly explored options to use OS timers (see
[this](https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/pull/9822) abandoned PR).
In short, it's not an attractive option because any timer implementation
adds non-trivial overheads.
# Solution
The insight is that, in the steady state of a batchable workload, the
time we spend in `get_vectored` will be hundreds of microseconds anyway.
If we prepare the next batch concurrently to `get_vectored`, we will
have a sizeable batch ready once `get_vectored` of the current batch is
done and do not need an explicit timeout.
This can be reasonably described as **pipelining of the protocol
handler**.
# Implementation
We model the sub-protocol handler for pagestream requests
(`handle_pagrequests`) as two futures that form a pipeline:
2. Batching: read requests from the connection and fill the current
batch
3. Execution: `take` the current batch, execute it using `get_vectored`,
and send the response.
The Reading and Batching stage are connected through a new type of
channel called `spsc_fold`.
See the long comment in the `handle_pagerequests_pipelined` for details.
# Changes
- Refactor `handle_pagerequests`
- separate functions for
- reading one protocol message; produces a `BatchedFeMessage` with just
one page request in it
- batching; tried to merge an incoming `BatchedFeMessage` into an
existing `BatchedFeMessage`; returns `None` on success and returns back
the incoming message in case merging isn't possible
- execution of a batched message
- unify the timeline handle acquisition & request span construction; it
now happen in the function that reads the protocol message
- Implement serial and pipelined model
- serial: what we had before any of the batching changes
- read one protocol message
- execute protocol messages
- pipelined: the design described above
- optionality for execution of the pipeline: either via concurrent
futures vs tokio tasks
- Pageserver config
- remove batching timeout field
- add ability to configure pipelining mode
- add ability to limit max batch size for pipelined configurations
(required for the rollout, cf
https://github.com/neondatabase/cloud/issues/20620 )
- ability to configure execution mode
- Tests
- remove `batch_timeout` parametrization
- rename `test_getpage_merge_smoke` to `test_throughput`
- add parametrization to test different max batch sizes and execution
moes
- rename `test_timer_precision` to `test_latency`
- rename the test case file to `test_page_service_batching.py`
- better descriptions of what the tests actually do
## On the holding The `TimelineHandle` in the pending batch
While batching, we hold the `TimelineHandle` in the pending batch.
Therefore, the timeline will not finish shutting down while we're
batching.
This is not a problem in practice because the concurrently ongoing
`get_vectored` call will fail quickly with an error indicating that the
timeline is shutting down.
This results in the Execution stage returning a `QueryError::Shutdown`,
which causes the pipeline / entire page service connection to shut down.
This drops all references to the
`Arc<Mutex<Option<Box<BatchedFeMessage>>>>` object, thereby dropping the
contained `TimelineHandle`s.
- => fixes https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/9850
# Performance
Local run of the benchmarks, results in [this empty
commit](1cf5b1463f)
in the PR branch.
Key take-aways:
* `concurrent-futures` and `tasks` deliver identical `batching_factor`
* tail latency impact unknown, cf
https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/9837
* `concurrent-futures` has higher throughput than `tasks` in all
workloads (=lower `time` metric)
* In unbatchable workloads, `concurrent-futures` has 5% higher
`CPU-per-throughput` than that of `tasks`, and 15% higher than that of
`serial`.
* In batchable-32 workload, `concurrent-futures` has 8% lower
`CPU-per-throughput` than that of `tasks` (comparison to tput of
`serial` is irrelevant)
* in unbatchable workloads, mean and tail latencies of
`concurrent-futures` is practically identical to `serial`, whereas
`tasks` adds 20-30us of overhead
Overall, `concurrent-futures` seems like a slightly more attractive
choice.
# Rollout
This change is disabled-by-default.
Rollout plan:
- https://github.com/neondatabase/cloud/issues/20620
# Refs
- epic: https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/9376
- this sub-task: https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/9377
- the abandoned attempt to improve batching timeout resolution:
https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/pull/9820
- closes https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/9850
- fixes https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/9835
