## Problem
There has been some inconsistencies of providing tenant config via
`tenant_create` and via other tenant config APIs due to how the
properties are processed: in `tenant_create`, the test framework calls
neon-cli and therefore puts those properties in the cmdline. In other
cases, it's done via the HTTP API by directly serializing to a JSON.
When using the cmdline, the program only accepts serde bool that is
true/false.
## Summary of changes
Convert Python bool into `true`/`false` when using neon-cli.
Signed-off-by: Alex Chi Z <chi@neon.tech>
## Problem
LKB-197, #9516
To make sure the migration path is smooth.
The previous plan is to store new relations in new keyspace and old ones
in old keyspace until it gets dropped. This makes the migration path
hard as we can't validate v2 writes and can't rollback. This patch gives
us a more smooth migration path:
- The first time we enable reldirv2 for a tenant, we copy over
everything in the old keyspace to the new one. This might create a short
spike of latency for the create relation operation, but it's oneoff.
- After that, we have identical v1/v2 keyspace and read/write both of
them. We validate reads every time we list the reldirs.
- If we are in `migrating` mode, use v1 as source of truth and log a
warning for failed v2 operations. If we are in `migrated` mode, use v2
as source of truth and error when writes fail.
- One compatibility test uses dataset from the time where we enabled
reldirv2 (of the original rollout plan), which only has relations
written to the v2 keyspace instead of the v1 keyspace. We had to adjust
it accordingly.
- Add `migrated_at` in index_part to indicate the LSN where we did the
initialize.
TODOs:
- Test if relv1 can be read below the migrated_at LSN.
- Move the initialization process to L0 compaction instead of doing it
on the write path.
- Disable relcache in the relv2 test case so that all code path gets
fully tested.
## Summary of changes
- New behavior of reldirv2 migration flags as described above.
---------
Signed-off-by: Alex Chi Z <chi@neon.tech>
## Problem
In Neon DBaaS we adjust the shared_buffers to the size of the compute,
or better described we adjust the max number of connections to the
compute size and we adjust the shared_buffers size to the number of max
connections according to about the following sizes
`2 CU: 225mb; 4 CU: 450mb; 8 CU: 900mb`
[see](877e33b428/goapp/controlplane/internal/pkg/compute/computespec/pg_settings.go (L405))
## Summary of changes
We should run perf unit tests with settings that is realistic for a
paying customer and select 8 CU as the reference for those tests.
## Problem
part of https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/9516
## Summary of changes
Similar to the aux v2 migration, we persist the relv2 migration status
into index_part, so that even the config item is set to false, we will
still read from the v2 storage to avoid loss of data.
Note that only the two variants `None` and
`Some(RelSizeMigration::Migrating)` are used for now. We don't have full
migration implemented so it will never be set to
`RelSizeMigration::Migrated`.
---------
Signed-off-by: Alex Chi Z <chi@neon.tech>
## Problem
We have `test_perf_many_relations` but it only runs on remote clusters,
and we cannot directly modify tenant config. Therefore, I patched one of
the current tests to benchmark relv2 performance.
close https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/9986
## Summary of changes
* Add `v1/v2` selector to `test_tx_abort_with_many_relations`.
---------
Signed-off-by: Alex Chi Z <chi@neon.tech>
## Problem
We want to verify how much / if pgbench throughput and latency on Neon
suffers if the database contains many other relations, too.
## Summary of changes
Modify the benchmarking.yml pgbench-compare job to
- create an addiitional project at scale factor 10 GiB
- before running pgbench add n tables (initially 10k) to the database
- then compare the pgbench throughput and latency to the existing
pgbench-compare at 10 Gib scale factor
We use a realistic template for the n relations that is a partitioned
table with some realistic data types, indexes and constraints - similar
to a table that we use internally.
Example run:
https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/actions/runs/12377565956/job/34547386959
