According to RFC 7519, `aud` is generally an array of StringOrURI, but
in special cases may be a single StringOrURI value. To accomodate future
control plane work where a single token may work for multiple services,
make the claim a vector.
Link: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7519#section-4.1.3
Signed-off-by: Tristan Partin <tristan@neon.tech>
Currently we only have an admin scope which allows a user to bypass the
compute_id check. When the admin scope is provided, validate the
audience of the JWT to be "compute".
Closes: https://github.com/neondatabase/cloud/issues/27614
Signed-off-by: Tristan Partin <tristan@neon.tech>
Work on https://github.com/neondatabase/cloud/issues/23721 and
https://github.com/neondatabase/cloud/issues/23714
Depends on https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/pull/11111
- Add `/configure_telemetry` API endpoint
- Support second rsyslog configuration for Postgres logs export
- Enable logs export when compute feature is enabled and configure
Postgres to send logs to syslog
I have used `/configure_telemetry` name because in the future I see it
also being used for configuring a `pg_tracing` extension to export
traces. Let me know if you'd rather have these APIs separate. In this
case we can rename it to `/configure_rsyslog`.
Updates `compute_tools` and `compute_api` crates to edition 2024. We
like to stay on the latest edition if possible. There is no functional
changes, however some code changes had to be done to accommodate the
edition's breaking changes.
The PR has three commits:
* the first commit updates the named crates to edition 2024 and appeases
`cargo clippy` by changing code.
* the second commit performs a `cargo fmt` that does some minor changes
(not many)
* the third commit performs a cargo fmt with nightly options to reorder
imports as a one-time thing. it's completely optional, but I offer it
here for the compute team to review it.
I'd like to hear opinions about the third commit, if it's wanted and
felt worth the diff or not. I think most attention should be put onto
the first commit.
Part of #10918
There is now a compute_ctl_config field in the response that currently
only contains a JSON Web Key set. compute_ctl currently doesn't do
anything with the keys, but will in the future.
The reasoning for the new field is due to the nature of empty computes.
When an empty compute is created, it does not have a tenant. A compute
spec is the primary means of communicating the details of an attached
tenant. In the empty compute state, there is no spec. Instead we wait
for the control plane to pass us one via /configure. If we were to
include the jwks field in the compute spec, we would have a partial
compute spec, which doesn't logically make sense.
Instead, we can have two means of passing settings to the compute:
- spec: tenant specific config details
- compute_ctl_config: compute specific settings
For instance, the JSON Web Key set passed to the compute is independent
of any tenant. It is a setting of the compute whether it is attached or
not.
Signed-off-by: Tristan Partin <tristan@neon.tech>
Adds endpoint to install extensions:
**POST** `/extensions`
```
{"extension":"pg_sessions_jwt","database":"neondb","version":"1.0.0"}
```
Will be used by `local-proxy`.
Example, for the JWT authentication to work the database needs to have
the pg_session_jwt extension and also to enable JWT to work in RLS
policies.
---------
Co-authored-by: Conrad Ludgate <conradludgate@gmail.com>
This PR introduces a `/grants` endpoint which allows setting specific
`privileges` to certain `role` for a certain `schema`.
Related to #9344
Together these endpoints will be used to configure JWT extension and set
correct usage to its schema to specific roles that will need them.
---------
Co-authored-by: Conrad Ludgate <conradludgate@gmail.com>
This is in preparation of using compute_ctl to launch postgres nodes
in the neon_local control plane. And seems like a good idea to
separate the public interfaces anyway.
One non-mechanical change here is that the 'metrics' field is moved
under the Mutex, instead of using atomics. We were not using atomics
for performance but for convenience here, and it seems more clear to
not use atomics in the model for the HTTP response type.
