The idea is to achieve separation between keyspace layout definition
and operating on said keyspace. I've inlined all these function since
they're small and we don't use LTO in the storage release builds
at the moment.
Closes https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/6347
Before this patch, we would update the `tenant_state.intent` in memory
but not persist the detachment to disk.
I noticed this in https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/pull/6214 where
we stop, then restart, the attachment service.
## Problem
When a tenant is in Attaching state, and waiting for the
`concurrent_tenant_warmup` semaphore, it also listens for the tenant
cancellation token. When that token fires, Tenant::attach drops out.
Meanwhile, Tenant::set_stopping waits forever for the tenant to exit
Attaching state.
Fixes: https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/6423
## Summary of changes
- In the absence of a valid state for the tenant, it is set to Broken in
this path. A more elegant solution will require more refactoring, beyond
this minimal fix.
## Problem
If you build the compute-node dockerfile with the PG_VERSION argument
passed in (e.g. `docker build -f Dockerfile.compute-node --build-arg
PG_VERSION=v15 .`, it fails, as some of stages doesn't have the
PG_VERSION arg defined.
## Summary of changes
Added the PG_VERSION arg to the plv8-build, neon-pg-ext-build, and
pg-embedding-pg-build stages of Dockerfile.compute-node
## Problem
See https://neondb.slack.com/archives/C06F5UJH601/p1705731304237889
Adding 1 to xid in `update_next_xid` can cause overflow in debug mode.
0xffffffff is valid transaction ID.
## Summary of changes
Use `wrapping_add`
## Checklist before requesting a review
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code.
- [ ] If it is a core feature, I have added thorough tests.
- [ ] Do we need to implement analytics? if so did you add the relevant
metrics to the dashboard?
- [ ] If this PR requires public announcement, mark it with
/release-notes label and add several sentences in this section.
## Checklist before merging
- [ ] Do not forget to reformat commit message to not include the above
checklist
---------
Co-authored-by: Konstantin Knizhnik <knizhnik@neon.tech>
Co-authored-by: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki@neon.tech>
## Problem
In https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/pull/6283 I did a couple changes
that weren't directly related to the goal of extracting the state
machine, so I'm putting them here
## Summary of changes
- move postgres vs console provider into another enum
- reduce error cases for link auth
- slightly refactor link flow
## Problem
Currently we store in cache even if the project is undefined. That makes
invalidation impossible.
## Summary of changes
Do not store if project id is empty.
update_next_xid() doesn't have any special treatment for the invalid or
other special XIDs, so it will treat InvalidTransactionId (0) as a
regular XID. If old nextXid is smaller than 2^31, 0 will look like a
very old XID, and nothing happens. But if nextXid is greater than 2^31 0
will look like a very new XID, and update_next_xid() will incorrectly
bump up nextXID.
configures nextest to kill tests after 1 minute. slow period is set to
20s which is how long our tests currently take in total, there will be 2
warnings and then the test will be killed and it's output logged.
Cc: #6361
Cc: #6368 -- likely this will be enough for longer time, but it will be
counter productive when we want to attach and debug; the added line
would have to be commented out.
## Problem
Some fields were missed in the initial spec.
## Summary of changes
Adds a success boolean (defaults to false unless specifically marked as
successful).
Adds a duration_us integer that tracks how many microseconds were taken
from session start through to request completion.
From #6037 on, until this patch, if the client opens the connection but
doesn't send a `PagestreamFeMessage` within the first 10ms, we'd close
the connection because `self.timeline_cancelled()` returns.
It returns because `self.shard_timelines` is still empty at that point:
it gets filled lazily within the handlers for the incoming messages.
Changes
-------
The question is: if we can't check for timeline cancellation, what else
do we need to be cancellable for? `tenant.cancel` is also a bad choice
because the `tenant` (shard) we pick at the top of handle_pagerequests
might indeed go away over the course of the connection lifetime, but
other shards may still be there.
The correct solution, I think, is to be responsive to task_mgr
cancellation, because the connection handler runs in a task_mgr task and
it is already the current canonical way how we shut down a tenant's /
timelin's page_service connections (see `Tenant::shutdown` /
`Timeline::shutdown`).
So, rename the function and make it sensitive to task_mgr cancellation.
In the most straightforward way; safekeeper performs it in DELETE endpoint
implementation, with no coordination between sks.
delete_force endpoint in the code is renamed to delete as there is only one way
to delete.
## Problem
For PRs with `run-benchmarks` label, we don't upload results to the db,
making it harder to debug such tests. The only way to see some
numbers is by examining GitHub Action output which is really
inconvenient.
This PR adds zenbenchmark metrics to Allure reports.
## Summary of changes
- Create a json file with zenbenchmark results and attach it to allure
report
In
7f828890cf
we changed the logic for persisting control_files. Previously it was
updated if `peer_horizon_lsn` jumped more than one segment, which made
`peer_horizon_lsn` initialized on disk as soon as safekeeper has
received a first `AppendRequest`.
This caused an issue with `truncateLsn`, which now can be zero
sometimes. This PR fixes it, and now `truncateLsn/peer_horizon_lsn` can
never be zero once we know `timeline_start_lsn`.
Closes https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/6248
With testing the new eviction order there is a problem of all of the
(currently rare) disk usage based evictions being rare and unique; this
PR adds a human readable summary of what absolute order would had done
and what the relative order does. Assumption is that these loggings will
make the few evictions runs in staging more useful.
Cc: #5304 for allowing testing in the staging
## Problem
Use [NEON_SMGR] for all log messages produced by neon extension.
## Summary of changes
## Checklist before requesting a review
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code.
- [ ] If it is a core feature, I have added thorough tests.
- [ ] Do we need to implement analytics? if so did you add the relevant
metrics to the dashboard?
- [ ] If this PR requires public announcement, mark it with
/release-notes label and add several sentences in this section.
## Checklist before merging
- [ ] Do not forget to reformat commit message to not include the above
checklist
---------
Co-authored-by: Konstantin Knizhnik <knizhnik@neon.tech>
- Start pgbouncer in VM from postgres user, to allow connection to
pgbouncer admin console.
- Remove unused compute_ctl options --pgbouncer-connstr
and --pgbouncer-ini-path.
- Fix and cleanup code of connection to pgbouncer, add retries
because pgbouncer may not be instantly ready when compute_ctl starts.
## Problem
tenant_id/timeline_id is no longer a full identifier for metrics from a
`Tenant` or `Timeline` object.
Closes: https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/5953
## Summary of changes
Include `shard_id` label everywhere we have `tenant_id`/`timeline_id`
label.
I just failed to see this earlier on #6136. layer counts are used as an
abstraction, and each of the two tenants lose proportionally about the
same amount of layers. sadly there is no difference in between
`relative_spare` and `relative_equal` as both of these end up evicting
the exact same amount of layers, but I'll try to add later another test
for those.
Cc: #5304
## Problem
Currently relation hash size is limited by "neon.relsize_hash_size" GUC
with default value 64k.
64k relations is not so small number... but it is enough to create 376
databases to exhaust it.
## Summary of changes
Use LRU replacement algorithm to prevent hash overflow
## Checklist before requesting a review
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code.
- [ ] If it is a core feature, I have added thorough tests.
- [ ] Do we need to implement analytics? if so did you add the relevant
metrics to the dashboard?
- [ ] If this PR requires public announcement, mark it with
/release-notes label and add several sentences in this section.
## Checklist before merging
- [ ] Do not forget to reformat commit message to not include the above
checklist
---------
Co-authored-by: Konstantin Knizhnik <knizhnik@neon.tech>
