## Problem
The metrics `storage_controller_safekeeper_request_error` and
`storage_controller_safekeeper_request_latency` currently use
`pageserver_id` as a label.
This can be misleading, as the metrics are about safekeeper requests.
We want to replace this with a more accurate label — either
`safekeeper_id` or `node_id`.
## Summary of changes
- Introduced `SafekeeperRequestLabelGroup` with `safekeeper_id`.
- Updated the affected metrics to use the new label group.
- Fixed incorrect metric usage in safekeeper_client.rs
## Follow-up
- Review usage of these metrics in alerting rules and existing Grafana
dashboards to ensure this change does not break something.
## Problem
`switch_timeline_membership` is implemented on safekeeper's server side,
but the is missing in the client.
- Part of https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/11823
## Summary of changes
- Add `switch_timeline_membership` method to `SafekeeperClient`
Adds a test `test_storcon_create_delete_sk_down` which tests the
reconciler and pending op persistence if faced with a temporary
safekeeper downtime during timeline creation or deletion. This is in
contrast to `test_explicit_timeline_creation_storcon`, which tests the
happy path.
We also do some fixes:
* timeline and tenant deletion http requests didn't expect a body, but
`()` sent one.
* we got the tenant deletion http request's return type wrong: it's
supposed to be a hash map
* we add some logging to improve observability
* We fix `list_pending_ops` which had broken code meant to make it
possible to restrict oneself to a single pageserver. But diesel doesn't
support that sadly, or at least I couldn't figure out a way to make it
work. We don't need that functionality, so remove it.
* We add an info span to the heartbeater futures with the node id, so
that there is no context-free msgs like "Backoff: waiting 1.1 seconds
before processing with the task" in the storcon logs. we could also add
the full base url of the node but don't do it as most other log lines
contain that information already, and if we do duplication it should at
least not be verbose. One can always find out the base url from the node
id.
Successor of #11261
Part of #9011
If a tenant gets deleted, delete also all of its timelines. We assume
that by the time a tenant is being deleted, no new timelines are being
created, so we don't need to worry about races with creation in this
situation.
Unlike #11233, which was very simple because it listed the timelines and
invoked timeline deletion, this PR obtains a list of safekeepers to
invoke the tenant deletion on, and then invokes tenant deletion on each
safekeeper that has one or multiple timelines.
Alternative to #11233
Builds on #11288
Part of #9011
Adds a basic test that makes the storcon issue explicit creation of a
timeline on safeekepers (main storcon PR in #11058). It was adapted from
`test_explicit_timeline_creation` from #11002.
Also, do a bunch of fixes needed to get the test work (the API
definitions weren't correct), and log more stuff when we can't create a
new timeline due to no safekeepers being active.
Part of #9011
---------
Co-authored-by: Arseny Sher <sher-ars@yandex.ru>
Adds API definitions for the safekeeper API endpoints `exclude_timeline`
and `term_bump`. Also does a bugfix to return the correct type from
`delete_timeline`.
Part of #8614
This PR extends the storcon with basic safekeeper management of
timelines, mainly timeline creation and deletion. We want to make the
storcon manage safekeepers in the future. Timeline creation is
controlled by the `--timelines-onto-safekeepers` flag.
1. it adds the `timelines` and `safekeeper_timeline_pending_ops` tables
to the storcon db
2. extend code for the timeline creation and deletion
4. it adds per-safekeeper reconciler tasks
TODO:
* maybe not immediately schedule reconciliations for deletions but have
a prior manual step
* tenant deletions
* add exclude API definitions (probably separate PR)
* how to choose safekeeper to do exclude on vs deletion? this can be a
bit hairy because the safekeeper might go offline in the meantime.
* error/failure case handling
* tests (cc test_explicit_timeline_creation from #11002)
* single safekeeper mode: we often only have one SK (in tests for
example)
* `notify-safekeepers` hook:
https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/11163
TODOs implemented:
* cancellations of enqueued reconciliations on a per-timeline basis,
helpful if there is an ongoing deletion
* implement pending ops overwrite behavior
* load pending operations from db
RFC section for important reading:
[link](https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/blob/main/docs/rfcs/035-safekeeper-dynamic-membership-change.md#storage_controller-implementation)
Implements the bulk of #9011
Successor of #10440.
---------
Co-authored-by: Arseny Sher <sher-ars@yandex.ru>
## Problem
Storage controller uses http for requests to safekeeper management API.
Closes: https://github.com/neondatabase/cloud/issues/24835
## Summary of changes
- Add `use_https_safekeeper_api` option to storcon to use https api
- Use https for requests to safekeeper management API if this option is
enabled
- Add `ssl_ca_file` option to storcon for ability to specify custom root
CA certificate
Updates storage components to edition 2024. We like to stay on the
latest edition if possible. There is no functional changes, however some
code changes had to be done to accommodate the edition's breaking
changes.
The PR has two commits:
* the first commit updates storage crates to edition 2024 and appeases
`cargo clippy` by changing code. i have accidentially ran the formatter
on some files that had other edits.
* the second commit performs a `cargo fmt`
I would recommend a closer review of the first commit and a less close
review of the second one (as it just runs `cargo fmt`).
part of https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/10918
Preparations for a successor of #10440:
* move `pull_timeline` to `safekeeper_api` and add it to
`SafekeeperClient`. we want to do `pull_timeline` on any creations that
we couldn't do initially.
* Add a `SafekeeperGeneration` type instead of relying on a type alias.
we want to maintain a safekeeper specific generation number now in the
storcon database. A separate type is important to make it impossible to
mix it up with the tenant's pageserver specific generation number. We
absolutely want to avoid that for correctness reasons. If someone mixes
up a safekeeper and pageserver id (both use the `NodeId` type), that's
bad but there is no wrong generations flying around.
part of #9011
In #9011, we want to schedule timelines to safekeepers. In order to do
such scheduling, we need information about how utilized a safekeeper is
and if it's available or not.
Therefore, send constant heartbeats to the safekeepers and try to figure
out if they are online or not.
Includes some code from #10440.
