Part of #8128.
## Problem
Scrubber uses `scan_metadata` command to flag metadata inconsistencies.
To trust it at scale, we need to make sure the errors we emit is a
reflection of real scenario. One check performed in the scrubber is to
see whether layers listed in the latest `index_part.json` is present in
object listing. Currently, the scrubber does not robustly handle the
case where objects are uploaded/deleted during the scan.
## Summary of changes
**Condition for success:** An object in the index is (1) in the object
listing we acquire from S3 or (2) found in a HeadObject request (new
object).
- Add in the `HeadObject` requests for the layers missing from the
object listing.
- Keep the order of first getting the object listing and then
downloading the layers.
- Update check to only consider shards with highest shard count.
- Skip analyzing a timeline if `deleted_at` tombstone is marked in
`index_part.json`.
- Add new test to see if scrubber actually detect the metadata
inconsistency.
_Misc_
- A timeline with no ancestor should always have some layers.
- Removed experimental histograms
_Caveat_
- Ancestor layer is not cleaned until #8308 is implemented. If ancestor
layers reference non-existing layers in the index, the scrubber will
emit false positives.
Signed-off-by: Yuchen Liang <yuchen@neon.tech>
Adds a find-large-objects subcommand to the scrubber to allow listing
layer objects larger than a specific size.
To be used like:
```
AWS_PROFILE=dev REGION=us-east-2 BUCKET=neon-dev-storage-us-east-2 cargo run -p storage_scrubber -- find-large-objects --min-size 250000000 --ignore-deltas
```
Part of #5431
The S3 scrubber contains "S3" in its name, but we want to make it
generic in terms of which storage is used (#7547). Therefore, rename it
to "storage scrubber", following the naming scheme of already existing
components "storage broker" and "storage controller".
Part of #7547
