This makes it possible for the compiler to validate that a match block
matched all PostgreSQL versions we support.
## Problem
We did not have a complete picture about which places we had to test
against PG versions, and what format these versions were: The full PG
version ID format (Major/minor/bugfix `MMmmbb`) as transfered in
protocol messages, or only the Major release version (`MM`). This meant
type confusion was rampant.
With this change, it becomes easier to develop new version-dependent
features, by making type and niche confusion impossible.
## Summary of changes
Every use of `pg_version` is now typed as either `PgVersionId` (u32,
valued in decimal `MMmmbb`) or PgMajorVersion (an enum, with a value for
every major version we support, serialized and stored like a u32 with
the value of that major version)
---------
Co-authored-by: Arpad Müller <arpad-m@users.noreply.github.com>
The 1.88.0 stable release is near (this Thursday). We'd like to fix most
warnings beforehand so that the compiler upgrade doesn't require
approval from too many teams.
This is therefore a preparation PR (like similar PRs before it).
There is a lot of changes for this release, mostly because the
`uninlined_format_args` lint has been added to the `style` lint group.
One can read more about the lint
[here](https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/#/uninlined_format_args).
The PR is the result of `cargo +beta clippy --fix` and `cargo fmt`. One
remaining warning is left for the proxy team.
---------
Co-authored-by: Conrad Ludgate <conrad@neon.tech>
Co-authored-by: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki@neon.tech>
Co-authored-by: Stas Kelvic <stas@neon.tech>
# Context
This PR contains PoC-level changes for a product feature that allows
onboarding large databases into Neon without going through the regular
data path.
# Changes
This internal RFC provides all the context
* https://github.com/neondatabase/cloud/pull/19799
In the language of the RFC, this PR covers
* the Importer code (`fast_import`)
* all the Pageserver changes (mgmt API changes, flow implementation,
etc)
* a basic test for the Pageserver changes
# Reviewing
As acknowledged in the RFC, the code added in this PR is not ready for
general availability.
Also, the **architecture is not to be discussed in this PR**, but in the
RFC and associated Slack channel instead.
Reviewers of this PR should take that into consideration.
The quality bar to apply during review depends on what area of the code
is being reviewed:
* Importer code (`fast_import`): practically anything goes
* Core flow (`flow.rs`):
* Malicious input data must be expected and the existing threat models
apply.
* The code must not be safe to execute on *dedicated* Pageserver
instances:
* This means in particular that tenants *on other* Pageserver instances
must not be affected negatively wrt data confidentiality, integrity or
availability.
* Other code: the usual quality bar
* Pay special attention to correct use of gate guards, timeline
cancellation in all places during shutdown & migration, etc.
* Consider the broader system impact; if you find potentially
problematic interactions with Storage features that were not covered in
the RFC, bring that up during the review.
I recommend submitting three separate reviews, for the three high-level
areas with different quality bars.
# References
(Internal-only)
* refs https://github.com/neondatabase/cloud/issues/17507
* refs https://github.com/neondatabase/company_projects/issues/293
* refs https://github.com/neondatabase/company_projects/issues/309
* refs https://github.com/neondatabase/cloud/issues/20646
---------
Co-authored-by: Stas Kelvich <stas.kelvich@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki@neon.tech>
Co-authored-by: John Spray <john@neon.tech>
