There is now a compute_ctl_config field in the response that currently
only contains a JSON Web Key set. compute_ctl currently doesn't do
anything with the keys, but will in the future.
The reasoning for the new field is due to the nature of empty computes.
When an empty compute is created, it does not have a tenant. A compute
spec is the primary means of communicating the details of an attached
tenant. In the empty compute state, there is no spec. Instead we wait
for the control plane to pass us one via /configure. If we were to
include the jwks field in the compute spec, we would have a partial
compute spec, which doesn't logically make sense.
Instead, we can have two means of passing settings to the compute:
- spec: tenant specific config details
- compute_ctl_config: compute specific settings
For instance, the JSON Web Key set passed to the compute is independent
of any tenant. It is a setting of the compute whether it is attached or
not.
Signed-off-by: Tristan Partin <tristan@neon.tech>
Adds endpoint to install extensions:
**POST** `/extensions`
```
{"extension":"pg_sessions_jwt","database":"neondb","version":"1.0.0"}
```
Will be used by `local-proxy`.
Example, for the JWT authentication to work the database needs to have
the pg_session_jwt extension and also to enable JWT to work in RLS
policies.
---------
Co-authored-by: Conrad Ludgate <conradludgate@gmail.com>
This PR introduces a `/grants` endpoint which allows setting specific
`privileges` to certain `role` for a certain `schema`.
Related to #9344
Together these endpoints will be used to configure JWT extension and set
correct usage to its schema to specific roles that will need them.
---------
Co-authored-by: Conrad Ludgate <conradludgate@gmail.com>
This is in preparation of using compute_ctl to launch postgres nodes
in the neon_local control plane. And seems like a good idea to
separate the public interfaces anyway.
One non-mechanical change here is that the 'metrics' field is moved
under the Mutex, instead of using atomics. We were not using atomics
for performance but for convenience here, and it seems more clear to
not use atomics in the model for the HTTP response type.
