## Problem
The extensions for Postgres v17 are ready but we do not test the
extensions shipped with v17
## Summary of changes
Build the test image based on Postgres v17. Run the tests for v17.
---------
Co-authored-by: Anastasia Lubennikova <anastasia@neon.tech>
## Problem
Current compute images for Postgres 14-16 don't build on Debian 12
because of issues with extensions.
This PR fixes that, but for the current setup, it is mostly a no-op
change.
## Summary of changes
- Use `/bin/bash -euo pipefail` as SHELL to fail earlier
- Fix `plv8` build: backport a trivial patch for v8
- Fix `postgis` build: depend `sfgal` version on Debian version instead
of Postgres version
Tested in: https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/pull/9849
## Problem
We have a couple of CI workflows that still run on Debian Bullseye, and
the default Debian version in images is Bullseye as well (we explicitly
set building on Bookworm)
## Summary of changes
- Run `pgbench-pgvector` on Bookworm (fix a couple of packages)
- Run `trigger_bench_on_ec2_machine_in_eu_central_1` on Bookworm
- Change default `DEBIAN_VERSION` in Dockerfiles to Bookworm
- Make `pinned` docker tag an alias to `pinned-bookworm`
Co-authored-by: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki@neon.tech>
Co-authored-by: Stas Kelvic <stas@neon.tech>
# Context
This PR contains PoC-level changes for a product feature that allows
onboarding large databases into Neon without going through the regular
data path.
# Changes
This internal RFC provides all the context
* https://github.com/neondatabase/cloud/pull/19799
In the language of the RFC, this PR covers
* the Importer code (`fast_import`)
* all the Pageserver changes (mgmt API changes, flow implementation,
etc)
* a basic test for the Pageserver changes
# Reviewing
As acknowledged in the RFC, the code added in this PR is not ready for
general availability.
Also, the **architecture is not to be discussed in this PR**, but in the
RFC and associated Slack channel instead.
Reviewers of this PR should take that into consideration.
The quality bar to apply during review depends on what area of the code
is being reviewed:
* Importer code (`fast_import`): practically anything goes
* Core flow (`flow.rs`):
* Malicious input data must be expected and the existing threat models
apply.
* The code must not be safe to execute on *dedicated* Pageserver
instances:
* This means in particular that tenants *on other* Pageserver instances
must not be affected negatively wrt data confidentiality, integrity or
availability.
* Other code: the usual quality bar
* Pay special attention to correct use of gate guards, timeline
cancellation in all places during shutdown & migration, etc.
* Consider the broader system impact; if you find potentially
problematic interactions with Storage features that were not covered in
the RFC, bring that up during the review.
I recommend submitting three separate reviews, for the three high-level
areas with different quality bars.
# References
(Internal-only)
* refs https://github.com/neondatabase/cloud/issues/17507
* refs https://github.com/neondatabase/company_projects/issues/293
* refs https://github.com/neondatabase/company_projects/issues/309
* refs https://github.com/neondatabase/cloud/issues/20646
---------
Co-authored-by: Stas Kelvich <stas.kelvich@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki@neon.tech>
Co-authored-by: John Spray <john@neon.tech>
This exporter logs an ERROR if a file called `postgres_exporter.yml` is
not located in its current working directory. We can silence it by
adding an empty config file and pointing the exporter at it.
Signed-off-by: Tristan Partin <tristan@neon.tech>
Build the pgrag extensions (rag, rag_bge_small_en_v15, and
rag_jina_reranker_v1_tiny_en) as part of the compute node Dockerfile.
---------
Co-authored-by: Alexander Bayandin <alexander@neon.tech>
## Problem
Our dockerfiles, for some historical reason, have unconventional names
`Dockerfile.<something>`, and some tools (like GitHub UI) fail to highlight
the syntax in them.
> Some projects may need distinct Dockerfiles for specific purposes. A
common convention is to name these `<something>.Dockerfile`
From: https://docs.docker.com/build/concepts/dockerfile/#filename
## Summary of changes
- Rename `Dockerfile.build-tools` -> `build-tools.Dockerfile`
- Rename `compute/Dockerfile.compute-node` ->
`compute/compute-node.Dockerfile`