Do pull_timeline while WAL is being removed. To this end
- extract pausable_failpoint to utils, sprinkle pull_timeline with it
- add 'checkpoint' sk http endpoint to force WAL removal.
After fixing checking for pull file status code test fails so far which is
expected.
While switching to use nextest with the repository in f28bdb6, we had
not noticed that it doesn't yet support running doctests. Run the doc
tests before other tests.
We had an incident where pageserver requests timed out because
pageserver couldn't fetch WAL from safekeepers. This incident was caused
by a bug in safekeeper logic for timeline activation, which prevented
pageserver from finding safekeepers.
This bug was since fixed, but there is still a chance of a similar bug
in the future due to overall complexity.
We add a new broker message to "signal interest" for timeline. This
signal will be sent by pageservers `wait_lsn`, and safekeepers will
receive this signal to start broadcasting broker messages. Then every
broker subscriber will be able to find the safekeepers and connect to
them (to start fetching WAL).
This feature is not limited to pageservers and any service that wants to
download WAL from safekeepers will be able to use this discovery
request.
This commit changes pageserver's connection_manager (walreceiver) to
send a SafekeeperDiscoveryRequest when there is no information about
safekeepers present in memory. Current implementation will send these
requests only if there is an active wait_lsn() call and no more often
than once per 10 seconds.
Add `test_broker_discovery` to test this: safekeepers started with
`--disable-periodic-broker-push` will not push info to broker so that
pageserver must use a discovery to start fetching WAL.
Add task_stats in safekeepers broker module to log a warning if there is
no message received from the broker for the last 10 seconds.
Closes#5471
---------
Co-authored-by: Christian Schwarz <christian@neon.tech>
## Problem
Sometimes we have test data in the form of S3 contents that we would
like to run live in a neon_local environment.
## Summary of changes
- Add a storage controller API that imports an existing tenant.
Currently this is equivalent to doing a create with a high generation
number, but in future this would be something smarter to probe S3 to
find the shards in a tenant and find generation numbers.
- Add a `neon_local` command that invokes the import API, and then
inspects timelines in the newly attached tenant to create matching
branches.
#7030 introduced an annoying papercut, deeming a failure to acquire a
strong reference to `LayerInner` from `DownloadedLayer::drop` as a
canceled eviction. Most of the time, it wasn't that, but just timeline
deletion or tenant detach with the layer not wanting to be deleted or
evicted.
When a Layer is dropped as part of a normal shutdown, the `Layer` is
dropped first, and the `DownloadedLayer` the second. Because of this, we
cannot detect eviction being canceled from the `DownloadedLayer::drop`.
We can detect it from `LayerInner::drop`, which this PR adds.
Test case is added which before had 1 started eviction, 2 canceled. Now
it accurately finds 1 started, 1 canceled.
Before this PR, the `nix::poll::poll` call would stall the executor.
This PR refactors the `walredo::process` module to allow for different
implementations, and adds a new `async` implementation which uses
`tokio::process::ChildStd{in,out}` for IPC.
The `sync` variant remains the default for now; we'll do more testing in
staging and gradual rollout to prod using the config variable.
Performance
-----------
I updated `bench_walredo.rs`, demonstrating that a single `async`-based
walredo manager used by N=1...128 tokio tasks has lower latency and
higher throughput.
I further did manual less-micro-benchmarking in the real pageserver
binary.
Methodology & results are published here:
https://neondatabase.notion.site/2024-04-08-async-walredo-benchmarking-8c0ed3cc8d364a44937c4cb50b6d7019?pvs=4
tl;dr:
- use pagebench against a pageserver patched to answer getpage request &
small-enough working set to fit into PS PageCache / kernel page cache.
- compare knee in the latency/throughput curve
- N tenants, each 1 pagebench clients
- sync better throughput at N < 30, async better at higher N
- async generally noticable but not much worse p99.X tail latencies
- eyeballing CPU efficiency in htop, `async` seems significantly more
CPU efficient at ca N=[0.5*ncpus, 1.5*ncpus], worse than `sync` outside
of that band
Mental Model For Walredo & Scheduler Interactions
-------------------------------------------------
Walredo is CPU-/DRAM-only work.
This means that as soon as the Pageserver writes to the pipe, the
walredo process becomes runnable.
To the Linux kernel scheduler, the `$ncpus` executor threads and the
walredo process thread are just `struct task_struct`, and it will divide
CPU time fairly among them.
In `sync` mode, there are always `$ncpus` runnable `struct task_struct`
because the executor thread blocks while `walredo` runs, and the
executor thread becomes runnable when the `walredo` process is done
handling the request.
In `async` mode, the executor threads remain runnable unless there are
no more runnable tokio tasks, which is unlikely in a production
pageserver.
The above means that in `sync` mode, there is an implicit concurrency
limit on concurrent walredo requests (`$num_runtimes *
$num_executor_threads_per_runtime`).
And executor threads do not compete in the Linux kernel scheduler for
CPU time, due to the blocked-runnable-ping-pong.
In `async` mode, there is no concurrency limit, and the walredo tasks
compete with the executor threads for CPU time in the kernel scheduler.
If we're not CPU-bound, `async` has a pipelining and hence throughput
advantage over `sync` because one executor thread can continue
processing requests while a walredo request is in flight.
If we're CPU-bound, under a fair CPU scheduler, the *fixed* number of
executor threads has to share CPU time with the aggregate of walredo
processes.
It's trivial to reason about this in `sync` mode due to the
blocked-runnable-ping-pong.
In `async` mode, at 100% CPU, the system arrives at some (potentially
sub-optiomal) equilibrium where the executor threads get just enough CPU
time to fill up the remaining CPU time with runnable walredo process.
Why `async` mode Doesn't Limit Walredo Concurrency
--------------------------------------------------
To control that equilibrium in `async` mode, one may add a tokio
semaphore to limit the number of in-flight walredo requests.
However, the placement of such a semaphore is non-trivial because it
means that tasks queuing up behind it hold on to their request-scoped
allocations.
In the case of walredo, that might be the entire reconstruct data.
We don't limit the number of total inflight Timeline::get (we only
throttle admission).
So, that queue might lead to an OOM.
The alternative is to acquire the semaphore permit *before* collecting
reconstruct data.
However, what if we need to on-demand download?
A combination of semaphores might help: one for reconstruct data, one
for walredo.
The reconstruct data semaphore permit is dropped after acquiring the
walredo semaphore permit.
This scheme effectively enables both a limit on in-flight reconstruct
data and walredo concurrency.
However, sizing the amount of permits for the semaphores is tricky:
- Reconstruct data retrieval is a mix of disk IO and CPU work.
- If we need to do on-demand downloads, it's network IO + disk IO + CPU
work.
- At this time, we have no good data on how the wall clock time is
distributed.
It turns out that, in my benchmarking, the system worked fine without a
semaphore. So, we're shipping async walredo without one for now.
Future Work
-----------
We will do more testing of `async` mode and gradual rollout to prod
using the config flag.
Once that is done, we'll remove `sync` mode to avoid the temporary code
duplication introduced by this PR.
The flag will be removed.
The `wait()` for the child process to exit is still synchronous; the
comment [here](
655d3b6468/pageserver/src/walredo.rs (L294-L306))
is still a valid argument in favor of that.
The `sync` mode had another implicit advantage: from tokio's
perspective, the calling task was using up coop budget.
But with `async` mode, that's no longer the case -- to tokio, the writes
to the child process pipe look like IO.
We could/should inform tokio about the CPU time budget consumed by the
task to achieve fairness similar to `sync`.
However, the [runtime function for this is
`tokio_unstable`](`https://docs.rs/tokio/latest/tokio/task/fn.consume_budget.html).
Refs
----
refs #6628
refs https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/2975
## Problem
We have two places that use a helper (`ser_rfc3339_millis`) to get serde
to stringify SystemTimes into the desired format.
## Summary of changes
Created a new module `utils::serde_system_time` and inside it a wrapper
type `SystemTime` for `std::time::SystemTime` that
serializes/deserializes to the RFC3339 format.
This new type is then used in the two places that were previously using
the helper for serialization, thereby eliminating the need to decorate
structs.
Closes#7151.
This PR is an off-by-default revision v2 of the (since-reverted) PR
#6555 / commit `3220f830b7fbb785d6db8a93775f46314f10a99b`.
See that PR for details on why running with a single runtime is
desirable and why we should be ready.
We reverted #6555 because it showed regressions in prodlike cloudbench,
see the revert commit message `ad072de4209193fd21314cf7f03f14df4fa55eb1`
for more context.
This PR makes it an opt-in choice via an env var.
The default is to use the 4 separate runtimes that we have today, there
shouldn't be any performance change.
I tested manually that the env var & added metric works.
```
# undefined env var => no change to before this PR, uses 4 runtimes
./target/debug/neon_local start
# defining the env var enables one-runtime mode, value defines that one runtime's configuration
NEON_PAGESERVER_USE_ONE_RUNTIME=current_thread ./target/debug/neon_local start
NEON_PAGESERVER_USE_ONE_RUNTIME=multi_thread:1 ./target/debug/neon_local start
NEON_PAGESERVER_USE_ONE_RUNTIME=multi_thread:2 ./target/debug/neon_local start
NEON_PAGESERVER_USE_ONE_RUNTIME=multi_thread:default ./target/debug/neon_local start
```
I want to use this change to do more manualy testing and potentially
testing in staging.
Future Work
-----------
Testing / deployment ergonomics would be better if this were a variable
in `pageserver.toml`.
It can be done, but, I don't need it right now, so let's stick with the
env var.
We want to move the code base away from task_mgr.
This PR refactors the walreceiver code such that it doesn't use
`task_mgr` anymore.
# Background
As a reminder, there are three tasks in a Timeline that's ingesting WAL.
`WalReceiverManager`, `WalReceiverConnectionHandler`, and
`WalReceiverConnectionPoller`.
See the documentation in `task_mgr.rs` for how they interact.
Before this PR, cancellation was requested through
task_mgr::shutdown_token() and `TaskHandle::shutdown`.
Wait-for-task-finish was implemented using a mixture of
`task_mgr::shutdown_tasks` and `TaskHandle::shutdown`.
This drawing might help:
<img width="300" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/assets/956573/b6be7ad6-ecb3-41d0-b410-ec85cb8d6d20">
# Changes
For cancellation, the entire WalReceiver task tree now has a
`child_token()` of `Timeline::cancel`. The `TaskHandle` no longer is a
cancellation root.
This means that `Timeline::cancel.cancel()` is propagated.
For wait-for-task-finish, all three tasks in the task tree hold the
`Timeline::gate` open until they exit.
The downside of using the `Timeline::gate` is that we can no longer wait
for just the walreceiver to shut down, which is particularly relevant
for `Timeline::flush_and_shutdown`.
Effectively, it means that we might ingest more WAL while the
`freeze_and_flush()` call is ongoing.
Also, drive-by-fix the assertiosn around task kinds in `wait_lsn`. The
check for `WalReceiverConnectionHandler` was ineffective because that
never was a task_mgr task, but a TaskHandle task. Refine the assertion
to check whether we would wait, and only fail in that case.
# Alternatives
I contemplated (ab-)using the `Gate` by having a separate `Gate` for
`struct WalReceiver`.
All the child tasks would use _that_ gate instead of `Timeline::gate`.
And `struct WalReceiver` itself would hold an `Option<GateGuard>` of the
`Timeline::gate`.
Then we could have a `WalReceiver::stop` function that closes the
WalReceiver's gate, then drops the `WalReceiver::Option<GateGuard>`.
However, such design would mean sharing the WalReceiver's `Gate` in an
`Arc`, which seems awkward.
A proper abstraction would be to make gates hierarchical, analogous to
CancellationToken.
In the end, @jcsp and I talked it over and we determined that it's not
worth the effort at this time.
# Refs
part of #7062
Release notes: https://blog.rust-lang.org/2024/03/21/Rust-1.77.0.html
Thanks to #6886 the diff is reasonable, only for one new lint
`clippy::suspicious_open_options`. I added `truncate()` calls to the
places where it is obviously the right choice to me, and added allows
everywhere else, leaving it for followups.
I had to specify cargo install --locked because the build would fail otherwise.
This was also recommended by upstream.
## Problem
Storage controller had basically no metrics.
## Summary of changes
1. Migrate the existing metrics to use Conrad's
[`measured`](https://docs.rs/measured/0.0.14/measured/) crate.
2. Add metrics for incoming http requests
3. Add metrics for outgoing http requests to the pageserver
4. Add metrics for outgoing pass through requests to the pageserver
5. Add metrics for database queries
Note that the metrics response for the attachment service does not use
chunked encoding like the rest of the metrics endpoints. Conrad has
kindly extended the crate such that it can now be done. Let's leave it
for a follow-up since the payload shouldn't be that big at this point.
Fixes https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/6875
Add shard_number to PageserverFeedback and parse it on the compute side.
When compute receives a new ps_feedback, it calculates min LSNs among
feedbacks from all shards, and uses those LSNs for backpressure.
Add `test_sharding_backpressure` to verify that backpressure slows down
compute to wait for the slowest shard.
# Problem
On-demand downloads are still using `tokio::fs`, which we know is
inefficient.
# Changes
- Add `pagebench ondemand-download-churn` to quantify on-demand download
throughput
- Requires dumping layer map, which required making `history_buffer`
impl `Deserialize`
- Implement an equivalent of `tokio::io::copy_buf` for owned buffers =>
`owned_buffers_io` module and children.
- Make layer file download sensitive to `io_engine::get()`, using
VirtualFile + above copy loop
- For this, I had to move some code into the `retry_download`, e.g.,
`sync_all()` call.
Drive-by:
- fix missing escaping in `scripts/ps_ec2_setup_instance_store`
- if we failed in retry_download to create a file, we'd try to remove
it, encounter `NotFound`, and `abort()` the process using
`on_fatal_io_error`. This PR adds treats `NotFound` as a success.
# Testing
Functional
- The copy loop is generic & unit tested.
Performance
- Used the `ondemand-download-churn` benchmark to manually test against
real S3.
- Results (public Notion page):
https://neondatabase.notion.site/Benchmarking-tokio-epoll-uring-on-demand-downloads-2024-04-15-newer-code-03c0fdc475c54492b44d9627b6e4e710?pvs=4
- Performance is equivalent at low concurrency. Jumpier situation at
high concurrency, but, still less CPU / throughput with
tokio-epoll-uring.
- It’s a win.
# Future Work
Turn the manual performance testing described in the above results
document into a performance regression test:
https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/7146
Aiming for the design where `heavier_once_cell::OnceCell` is initialized
by a future factory lead to awkwardness with how
`LayerInner::get_or_maybe_download` looks right now with the `loop`. The
loop helps with two situations:
- an eviction has been scheduled but has not yet happened, and a read
access should cancel the eviction
- a previous `LayerInner::get_or_maybe_download` that canceled a pending
eviction was canceled leaving the `heavier_once_cell::OnceCell`
uninitialized but needing repair by the next
`LayerInner::get_or_maybe_download`
By instead supporting detached initialization in
`heavier_once_cell::OnceCell` via an `OnceCell::get_or_detached_init`,
we can fix what the monolithic #7030 does:
- spawned off download task initializes the
`heavier_once_cell::OnceCell` regardless of the download starter being
canceled
- a canceled `LayerInner::get_or_maybe_download` no longer stops
eviction but can win it if not canceled
Split off from #7030.
Cc: #5331
Previously we aggregated ps_feedback on each safekeeper and sent it to
walproposer with every AppendResponse. This PR changes it to send
ps_feedback to walproposer right after receiving it from pageserver,
without aggregating it in memory. Also contains some preparations for
implementing backpressure support for sharding.
During onboarding, the control plane may attempt ad-hoc creation of a
secondary location to facilitate live migration. This gives us two
problems to solve:
- Accept 'Secondary' mode in /location_config and use it to put the
tenant into secondary mode on some physical pageserver, then pass
through /tenant/xyz/secondary/download requests
- Create tenants with no generation initially, since the initial
`Secondary` mode call will not provide us a generation.
This PR also fixes modification of a tenant's TenantConf during
/location_conf, which was previously ignored, and refines the flow for
config modification:
- avoid bumping generations when the only reason we're reconciling an
attached location is a config change
- increment TenantState.sequence when spawning a reconciler: usually
schedule() does this, but when we do config changes that doesn't happen,
so without this change waiters would think reconciliation was done
immediately. `sequence` is a bit of a murky thing right now, as it's
dual-purposed for tracking waiters, and for checking if an existing
reconciliation is already making updates to our current sequence. I'll
follow up at some point to clarify it's purpose.
- test config modification at the end of onboarding test
Nightly has added a bunch of compiler and linter warnings. There is also
two dependencies that fail compilation on latest nightly due to using
the old `stdsimd` feature name. This PR fixes them.
## Problem
Attachment service does not do auth based on JWT scopes.
## Summary of changes
Do JWT based permission checking for requests coming into the attachment
service.
Requests into the attachment service must use different tokens based on
the endpoint:
* `/control` and `/debug` require `admin` scope
* `/upcall` requires `generations_api` scope
* `/v1/...` requires `pageserverapi` scope
Requests into the pageserver from the attachment service must use
`pageserverapi` scope.
Reverts neondatabase/neon#6765 , bringing back #6731
We concluded that #6731 never was the root cause for the instability in
staging.
More details:
https://neondb.slack.com/archives/C033RQ5SPDH/p1708011674755319
However, the massive amount of concurrent `spawn_blocking` calls from
the `save_metadata` calls during startups might cause a performance
regression.
So, we'll merge this PR here after we've stopped writing the metadata
#6769).
## Problem
Even if you're not enforcing auth, the JwtAuth middleware barfs on
scopes it doesn't know about.
Add `generations_api` scope, which was invented in the cloud control
plane for the pageserver's /re-attach and /validate upcalls: this will
be enforced in storage controller's implementation of these in a later
PR.
Unfortunately the scope's naming doesn't match the other scope's naming
styles, so needs a manual serde decorator to give it an underscore.
## Summary of changes
- Add `Scope::GenerationsApi` variant
- Update pageserver + safekeeper auth code to print appropriate message
if they see it.
Some callers of `VirtualFile::crashsafe_overwrite` call it on the
executor thread, thereby potentially stalling it.
Others are more diligent and wrap it in `spawn_blocking(...,
Handle::block_on, ... )` to avoid stalling the executor thread.
However, because `crashsafe_overwrite` uses
VirtualFile::open_with_options internally, we spawn a new thread-local
`tokio-epoll-uring::System` in the blocking pool thread that's used for
the `spawn_blocking` call.
This PR refactors the situation such that we do the `spawn_blocking`
inside `VirtualFile::crashsafe_overwrite`. This unifies the situation
for the better:
1. Callers who didn't wrap in `spawn_blocking(..., Handle::block_on,
...)` before no longer stall the executor.
2. Callers who did it before now can avoid the `block_on`, resolving the
problem with the short-lived `tokio-epoll-uring::System`s in the
blocking pool threads.
A future PR will build on top of this and divert to tokio-epoll-uring if
it's configures as the IO engine.
Changes
-------
- Convert implementation to std::fs and move it into `crashsafe.rs`
- Yes, I know, Safekeepers (cc @arssher ) added `durable_rename` and
`fsync_async_opt` recently. However, `crashsafe_overwrite` is different
in the sense that it's higher level, i.e., it's more like
`std::fs::write` and the Safekeeper team's code is more building block
style.
- The consequence is that we don't use the VirtualFile file descriptor
cache anymore.
- I don't think it's a big deal because we have plenty of slack wrt
production file descriptor limit rlimit (see [this
dashboard](https://neonprod.grafana.net/d/e4a40325-9acf-4aa0-8fd9-f6322b3f30bd/pageserver-open-file-descriptors?orgId=1))
- Use `tokio::task::spawn_blocking` in
`VirtualFile::crashsafe_overwrite` to call the new
`crashsafe::overwrite` API.
- Inspect all callers to remove any double-`spawn_blocking`
- spawn_blocking requires the captures data to be 'static + Send. So,
refactor the callers. We'll need this for future tokio-epoll-uring
support anyway, because tokio-epoll-uring requires owned buffers.
Related Issues
--------------
- overall epic to enable write path to tokio-epoll-uring: #6663
- this is also kind of relevant to the tokio-epoll-uring System creation
failures that we encountered in staging, investigation being tracked in
#6667
- why is it relevant? Because this PR removes two uses of
`spawn_blocking+Handle::block_on`
The smaller changes I found while looking around #6584.
- rustfmt was not able to format handle_timeline_create
- fix Generation::get_suffix always allocating
- Generation was missing a `#[track_caller]` for panicky method
- attach has a lot of issues, but even with this PR it cannot be
formatted by rustfmt
- moved the `preload` span to be on top of `attach` -- it is awaited
inline
- make disconnected panic! or unreachable! into expect, expect_err
@problame noticed that the `tokio::sync::AcquireError` branch assertion
can be hit like in the added test. We haven't seen this yet in
production, but I'd prefer not to see it there. There `take_and_deinit`
is being used, but this race must be quite timing sensitive.
Rework of earlier: #6652.
This PR reverts
- https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/pull/6589
- https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/pull/6652
because there's a performance regression that's particularly visible at
high layer counts.
Most likely it's because the switch to RwLock inflates the
```
inner: heavier_once_cell::OnceCell<ResidentOrWantedEvicted>,
```
size from 48 to 88 bytes, which, by itself is almost a doubling of the
cache footprint, and probably the fact that it's now larger than a cache
line also doesn't help.
See this chat on the Neon discord for more context:
https://discord.com/channels/1176467419317940276/1204714372295958548/1205541184634617906
I'm reverting 6652 as well because it might also have perf implications,
and we're getting close to the next release. We should re-do its changes
after the next release, though.
cc @koivunej
cc @ivaxer
@problame noticed that the `tokio::sync::AcquireError` branch assertion
can be hit like in the first commit. We haven't seen this yet in
production, but I'd prefer not to see it there. There `take_and_deinit`
is being used, but this race must be quite timing sensitive.
- Automatically set a node's availability to Active if it is responsive
in startup_reconcile
- Impose a 5s timeout of HTTP request to list location conf, so that an
unresponsive node can't hang it for minutes
- Do several retries if the request fails with a retryable error, to be
tolerant of concurrent pageserver & storage controller restarts
- Add a readiness hook for use with k8s so that we can tell when the
startup reconciliaton is done and the service is fully ready to do work.
- Add /metrics to the list of un-authenticated endpoints (this is
unrelated but we're touching the line in this PR already, and it fixes
auth error spam in deployed container.)
- A test for the above.
Closes: #6670
The solution we ended up for `backoff::retry` requires always cloning of
cancellation tokens even though there is just `.await`. Fix that, and
also turn the return type into `Option<Result<T, E>>` avoiding the need
for the `E::cancelled()` fn passed in.
Cc: #6096
## Problem
Passing secrets in via CLI/environment is awkward when using helm for
deployment, and not ideal for security (secrets may show up in ps,
/proc).
We can bypass these issues by simply connecting directly to the AWS
Secrets Manager service at runtime.
## Summary of changes
- Add dependency on aws-sdk-secretsmanager
- Update other aws dependencies to latest, to match transitive
dependency versions
- Add `Secrets` type in attachment service, using AWS SDK to load if
secrets are not provided on the command line.
changes:
- two messages instead of message every second when gate was closing
- replace the gate name string by using a pointer
- slow GateGuards are likely to log who they were (see example)
example found in regress tests: <https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/pull/6542#issuecomment-1919009256>
Since fdatasync is used for flushing WAL, changing file size is unsafe. Make
segment creation atomic by using tmp file + rename to avoid using partially
initialized segments.
fixes https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/6402
## Problem
Spun off from https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/pull/6394 -- this PR
is just the persistence parts and the changes that enable it to work
nicely
## Summary of changes
- Revert #6444 and #6450
- In neon_local, start a vanilla postgres instance for the attachment
service to use.
- Adopt `diesel` crate for database access in attachment service. This
uses raw SQL migrations as the source of truth for the schema, so it's a
soft dependency: we can switch libraries pretty easily.
- Rewrite persistence.rs to use postgres (via diesel) instead of JSON.
- Preserve JSON read+write at startup and shutdown: this enables using
the JSON format in compatibility tests, so that we don't have to commit
to our DB schema yet.
- In neon_local, run database creation + migrations before starting
attachment service
- Run the initial reconciliation in Service::spawn in the background, so
that the pageserver + attachment service don't get stuck waiting for
each other to start, when restarting both together in a test.
## Problem
For #6423, creating a reproducer turned out to be very easy, as an
extension to test_ondemand_activation.
However, before I had diagnosed the issue, I was starting with a more
brute force approach of running creation API calls in the background
while restarting a pageserver, and that shows up a bunch of other
interesting issues.
In this PR:
- Add the reproducer for #6423 by extending `test_ondemand_activation`
(confirmed that this test fails if I revert the fix from
https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/pull/6430)
- In timeline creation, return 503 responses when we get an error and
the tenant's cancellation token is set: this covers the cases where we
get an anyhow::Error from something during timeline creation as a result
of shutdown.
- While waiting for tenants to become active during creation, don't
.map_err() the result to a 500: instead let the `From` impl map the
result to something appropriate (this includes mapping shutdown to 503)
- During tenant creation, we were calling `Tenant::load_local` because
no Preload object is provided. This is usually harmless because the
tenant dir is empty, but if there are some half-created timelines in
there, bad things can happen. Propagate the SpawnMode into
Tenant::attach, so that it can properly skip _any_ attempt to load
timelines if creating.
- When we call upsert_location, there's a SpawnMode that tells us
whether to load from remote storage or not. But if the operation is a
retry and we already have the tenant, it is not correct to skip loading
from remote storage: there might be a timeline there. This isn't
strictly a correctness issue as long as the caller behaves correctly
(does not assume that any timelines are persistent until the creation is
acked), but it's a more defensive position.
- If we shut down while the task in Tenant::attach is running, it can
end up spawning rogue tasks. Fix this by holding a GateGuard through
here, and in upsert_location shutting down a tenant after calling
tenant_spawn if we can't insert it into tenants_map. This fixes the
expected behavior that after shutdown_all_tenants returns, no tenant
tasks are running.
- Add `test_create_churn_during_restart`, which runs tenant & timeline
creations across pageserver restarts.
- Update a couple of tests that covered cancellation, to reflect the
cleaner errors we now return.
The pagebench integration PR (#6214) is the first to SIGQUIT & then
restart attachment_service.
With many tenants (100), we have found frequent failures on restart in
the CI[^1].
[^1]:
[Allure](https://neon-github-public-dev.s3.amazonaws.com/reports/pr-6214/7615750160/index.html#suites/e26265675583c610f99af77084ae58f1/851ff709578c4452/)
```
2024-01-22T19:07:57.932021Z INFO request{method=POST path=/attach-hook request_id=2697503c-7b3e-4529-b8c1-d12ef912d3eb}: Request handled, status: 200 OK
2024-01-22T19:07:58.898213Z INFO Got SIGQUIT. Terminating
2024-01-22T19:08:02.176588Z INFO version: git-env:d56f31639356ed8e8ce832097f132f27ee19ac8a, launch_timestamp: 2024-01-22 19:08:02.174634554 UTC, build_tag build_tag-env:7615750160, state at /tmp/test_output/test_pageserver_max_throughput_getpage_at_latest_lsn[10-13-30]/repo/attachments.json, listening on 127.0.0.1:15048
thread 'main' panicked at /__w/neon/neon/control_plane/attachment_service/src/persistence.rs:95:17:
Failed to load state from '/tmp/test_output/test_pageserver_max_throughput_getpage_at_latest_lsn[10-13-30]/repo/attachments.json': trailing characters at line 1 column 8957 (maybe your .neon/ dir was written by an older version?)
stack backtrace:
0: rust_begin_unwind
at /rustc/82e1608dfa6e0b5569232559e3d385fea5a93112/library/std/src/panicking.rs:645:5
1: core::panicking::panic_fmt
at /rustc/82e1608dfa6e0b5569232559e3d385fea5a93112/library/core/src/panicking.rs:72:14
2: attachment_service::persistence::PersistentState::load_or_new::{{closure}}
at ./control_plane/attachment_service/src/persistence.rs:95:17
3: attachment_service::persistence::Persistence:🆕:{{closure}}
at ./control_plane/attachment_service/src/persistence.rs:103:56
4: attachment_service::main::{{closure}}
at ./control_plane/attachment_service/src/main.rs:69:61
5: tokio::runtime::park::CachedParkThread::block_on::{{closure}}
at ./.cargo/registry/src/index.crates.io-6f17d22bba15001f/tokio-1.34.0/src/runtime/park.rs:282:63
6: tokio::runtime::coop::with_budget
at ./.cargo/registry/src/index.crates.io-6f17d22bba15001f/tokio-1.34.0/src/runtime/coop.rs:107:5
7: tokio::runtime::coop::budget
at ./.cargo/registry/src/index.crates.io-6f17d22bba15001f/tokio-1.34.0/src/runtime/coop.rs:73:5
8: tokio::runtime::park::CachedParkThread::block_on
at ./.cargo/registry/src/index.crates.io-6f17d22bba15001f/tokio-1.34.0/src/runtime/park.rs:282:31
9: tokio::runtime::context::blocking::BlockingRegionGuard::block_on
at ./.cargo/registry/src/index.crates.io-6f17d22bba15001f/tokio-1.34.0/src/runtime/context/blocking.rs:66:9
10: tokio::runtime::scheduler::multi_thread::MultiThread::block_on::{{closure}}
at ./.cargo/registry/src/index.crates.io-6f17d22bba15001f/tokio-1.34.0/src/runtime/scheduler/multi_thread/mod.rs:87:13
11: tokio::runtime::context::runtime::enter_runtime
at ./.cargo/registry/src/index.crates.io-6f17d22bba15001f/tokio-1.34.0/src/runtime/context/runtime.rs:65:16
12: tokio::runtime::scheduler::multi_thread::MultiThread::block_on
at ./.cargo/registry/src/index.crates.io-6f17d22bba15001f/tokio-1.34.0/src/runtime/scheduler/multi_thread/mod.rs:86:9
13: tokio::runtime::runtime::Runtime::block_on
at ./.cargo/registry/src/index.crates.io-6f17d22bba15001f/tokio-1.34.0/src/runtime/runtime.rs:350:50
14: attachment_service::main
at ./control_plane/attachment_service/src/main.rs:99:5
15: core::ops::function::FnOnce::call_once
at /rustc/82e1608dfa6e0b5569232559e3d385fea5a93112/library/core/src/ops/function.rs:250:5
note: Some details are omitted, run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=full` for a verbose backtrace.
```
The attachment_service handles SIGQUIT by just exiting the process.
In theory, the SIGQUIT could come in while we're writing out the
`attachments.json`.
Now, in above log output, there's a 1 second gap between the last
request completing
and the SIGQUIT coming in. So, there must be some other issue.
But, let's have this change anyways, maybe it helps uncover the real
cause for the test failure.
## Problem
To test sharding, we need something to control it. We could write python
code for doing this from the test runner, but this wouldn't be usable
with neon_local run directly, and when we want to write tests with large
number of shards/tenants, Rust is a better fit efficiently handling all
the required state.
This service enables automated tests to easily get a system with
sharding/HA without the test itself having to set this all up by hand:
existing tests can be run against sharded tenants just by setting a
shard count when creating the tenant.
## Summary of changes
Attachment service was previously a map of TenantId->TenantState, where
the principal state stored for each tenant was the generation and the
last attached pageserver. This enabled it to serve the re-attach and
validate requests that the pageserver requires.
In this PR, the scope of the service is extended substantially to do
overall management of tenants in the pageserver, including
tenant/timeline creation, live migration, evacuation of offline
pageservers etc. This is done using synchronous code to make declarative
changes to the tenant's intended state (`TenantState.policy` and
`TenantState.intent`), which are then translated into calls into the
pageserver by the `Reconciler`.
Top level summary of modules within
`control_plane/attachment_service/src`:
- `tenant_state`: structure that represents one tenant shard.
- `service`: implements the main high level such as tenant/timeline
creation, marking a node offline, etc.
- `scheduler`: for operations that need to pick a pageserver for a
tenant, construct a scheduler and call into it.
- `compute_hook`: receive notifications when a tenant shard is attached
somewhere new. Once we have locations for all the shards in a tenant,
emit an update to postgres configuration via the neon_local `LocalEnv`.
- `http`: HTTP stubs. These mostly map to methods on `Service`, but are
separated for readability and so that it'll be easier to adapt if/when
we switch to another RPC layer.
- `node`: structure that describes a pageserver node. The most important
attribute of a node is its availability: marking a node offline causes
tenant shards to reschedule away from it.
This PR is a precursor to implementing the full sharding service for
prod (#6342). What's the difference between this and a production-ready
controller for pageservers?
- JSON file persistence to be replaced with a database
- Limited observability.
- No concurrency limits. Marking a pageserver offline will try and
migrate every tenant to a new pageserver concurrently, even if there are
thousands.
- Very simple scheduler that only knows to pick the pageserver with
fewest tenants, and place secondary locations on a different pageserver
than attached locations: it does not try to place shards for the same
tenant on different pageservers. This matters little in tests, because
picking the least-used pageserver usually results in round-robin
placement.
- Scheduler state is rebuilt exhaustively for each operation that
requires a scheduler.
- Relies on neon_local mechanisms for updating postgres: in production
this would be something that flows through the real control plane.
---------
Co-authored-by: Arpad Müller <arpad-m@users.noreply.github.com>
## Problem
The code for tenant create and tenant attach was just a special case of
what upsert_location does.
## Summary of changes
- Use `upsert_location` for create and attach APIs
- Clean up error handling in upsert_location so that it can generate
appropriate HTTP response codes
- Update tests that asserted the old non-idempotent behavior of attach
- Rework the `test_ignore_while_attaching` test, and fix tenant shutdown
during activation, which this test was supposed to cover, but it was
actually just waiting for activation to complete.
## Problem
- When a client requests a key that isn't found in any shard on the node
(edge case that only happens if a compute's config is out of date), we
should prompt them to reconnect (as this includes a backoff), since they
will not be able to complete the request until they eventually get a
correct pageserver connection string.
- QueryError::Other is used excessively: this contains a type-ambiguous
anyhow::Error and is logged very verbosely (including backtrace).
## Summary of changes
- Introduce PageStreamError to replace use of anyhow::Error in request
handlers for getpage, etc.
- Introduce Reconnect and NotFound variants to QueryError
- Map the "shard routing error" case to PageStreamError::Reconnect ->
QueryError::Reconnect
- Update type conversions for LSN timeouts and tenant/timeline not found
errors to use PageStreamError::NotFound->QueryError::NotFound
