While @bojanserafimov is still working on best replacement of R-Tree in
layer_map.rs there is obvious pitfall in the current `search` method
implementation: is returns delta layer even if there is image layer if
greater LSN. I think that it should be fixed.
refactor: use new type LayerFileName when referring to layer file names in PathBuf/RemotePath
Before this patch, we would sometimes carry around plain file names in
`Path` types and/or awkwardly "rebase" paths to have a unified
representation of the layer file name between local and remote.
This patch introduces a new type `LayerFileName` which replaces the use
of `Path` / `PathBuf` / `RemotePath` in the `storage_sync2` APIs.
Instead of holding a string, it contains the parsed representation of
the image and delta file name.
When we need the file name, e.g., to construct a local path or
remote object key, we construct the name ad-hoc.
`LayerFileName` is also serde {Dese,Se}rializable, and in an initial
version of this patch, it was supposed to be used directly inside
`IndexPart`, replacing `RemotePath`.
However,
commit 3122f3282f
Ignore backup files (ones with .n.old suffix) in download_missing
fixed handling of `*.old` backup file names in IndexPart, and we need
to carry that behavior forward.
The solution is to remove `*.old` backup files names during
deserialization. When we re-serialize the IndexPart, the `*.old` file
will be gone.
This leaks the `.old` file in the remote storage, but makes it safe
to clean it up later.
There is additional churn by a preliminary refactoring that got squashed
into this change:
split off LayerMap's needs from trait Layer into super trait
That refactoring renames `Layer` to `PersistentLayer` and splits off a subset
of the functions into a super-trait called `Layer`.
The upser trait implements just the functions needed by `LayerMap`, whereas
`PersisentLayer` adds the context of the pageserver.
The naming is imperfect as some functions that reside in `PersistentLayer`
have nothing persistence-specific to it. But it's a step in the right direction.
Lookups in the R-tree call the "envelope" function for every comparison,
and our envelope function isn't very cheap, so that overhead adds up.
Create the envelope once, when the layer is inserted into the tree, and
store it along with the layer. That uses some more memory per layer, but
that's not very significant.
Speeds up the search operation 2x
Replace the layer array and linear search with R-tree
So far, the in-memory layer map that holds information about layer
files that exist, has used a simple Vec, in no particular order, to
hold information about all the layers. That obviously doesn't scale
very well; with thousands of layer files the linear search was
consuming a lot of CPU. Replace it with a two-dimensional R-tree, with
Key and LSN ranges as the dimensions.
For the R-tree, use the 'rstar' crate. To be able to use that, we
convert the Keys and LSNs into 256-bit integers. 64 bits would be
enough to represent LSNs, and 128 bits would be enough to represent
Keys. However, we use 256 bits, because rstar internally performs
multiplication to calculate the area of rectangles, and the result of
multiplying two 128 bit integers doesn't necessarily fit in 128 bits,
causing integer overflow and, if overflow-checks are enabled,
panic. To avoid that, we use 256 bit integers.
Add a performance test that creates a lot of layer files, to
demonstrate the benefit.