This PR adds a component-level benchmarking utility for pageserver.
Its name is `pagebench`.
The problem solved by `pagebench` is that we want to put Pageserver
under high load.
This isn't easily achieved with `pgbench` because it needs to go through
a compute, which has signficant performance overhead compared to
accessing Pageserver directly.
Further, compute has its own performance optimizations (most
importantly: caches). Instead of designing a compute-facing workload
that defeats those internal optimizations, `pagebench` simply bypasses
them by accessing pageserver directly.
Supported benchmarks:
* getpage@latest_lsn
* basebackup
* triggering logical size calculation
This code has no automated users yet.
A performance regression test for getpage@latest_lsn will be added in a
later PR.
part of https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/5771
This is a precursor to:
- https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/pull/6185
While that PR contains big changes to neon_local and attachment_service,
this PR contains a few unrelated standalone changes generated while
working on that branch:
- Fix restarting a pageserver when it contains multiple shards for the
same tenant
- When using location_config api to attach a tenant, create its
timelines dir
- Update test paths where generations were previously optional to make
them always-on: this avoids tests having to spuriously assert that
attachment_service is not None in order to make the linter happy.
- Add a TenantShardId python implementation for subsequent use in test
helpers that will be made shard-aware
- Teach scrubber to read across shards when checking for layer
existence: this is a refactor to track the list of existent layers at
tenant-level rather than locally to each timeline. This is a precursor
to testing shard splitting.
## Problem
In https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/pull/5957, the most essential
types were updated to use TenantShardId rather than TenantId. That
unblocked other work, but didn't fully enable running multiple shards
from the same tenant on the same pageserver.
## Summary of changes
- Use TenantShardId in page cache key for materialized pages
- Update mgr.rs get_tenant() and list_tenants() functions to use a shard
id, and update all callers.
- Eliminate the exactly_one_or_none helper in mgr.rs and all code that
used it
- Convert timeline HTTP routes to use tenant_shard_id
Note on page cache:
```
struct MaterializedPageHashKey {
/// Why is this TenantShardId rather than TenantId?
///
/// Usually, the materialized value of a page@lsn is identical on any shard in the same tenant. However, this
/// this not the case for certain internally-generated pages (e.g. relation sizes). In future, we may make this
/// key smaller by omitting the shard, if we ensure that reads to such pages always skip the cache, or are
/// special-cased in some other way.
tenant_shard_id: TenantShardId,
timeline_id: TimelineId,
key: Key,
}
```
## Problem
Currently, if one creates many shards they will all ingest all the data:
not much use! We want them to ingest a proportional share of the data
each.
Closes: #6025
## Summary of changes
- WalIngest object gets a copy of the ShardIdentity for the Tenant it
was created by.
- While iterating the `blocks` part of a decoded record, blocks that do
not match the current shard are ignored, apart from on shard zero where
they are used to update relation sizes in `observe_decoded_block` (but
not stored).
- Before committing a `DataDirModificiation` from a WAL record, we check
if it's empty, and drop the record if so. This check is necessary
(rather than just looking at the `blocks` part) because certain record
types may modify blocks in non-obvious ways (e.g.
`ingest_heapam_record`).
- Add WAL ingest metrics to record the total received, total committed,
and total filtered out
- Behaviour for unsharded tenants is unchanged: they will continue to
ingest all blocks, and will take the fast path through `is_key_local`
that doesn't bother calculating any hashes.
After this change, shards store a subset of the tenant's total data, and
accurate relation sizes are only maintained on shard zero.
---------
Co-authored-by: Arpad Müller <arpad-m@users.noreply.github.com>
to_string forces allocating a less than pointer sized string (costing on
stack 4 usize), using a Display formattable slug saves that. the
difference seems small, but at the same time, we log these a lot.
## Problem
When a pageserver receives a page service request identified by
TenantId, it must decide which `Tenant` object to route it to.
As in earlier PRs, this stuff is all a no-op for tenants with a single
shard: calls to `is_key_local` always return true without doing any
hashing on a single-shard ShardIdentity.
Closes: https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/6026
## Summary of changes
- Carry immutable `ShardIdentity` objects in Tenant and Timeline. These
provide the information that Tenants/Timelines need to figure out which
shard is responsible for which Key.
- Augment `get_active_tenant_with_timeout` to take a `ShardSelector`
specifying how the shard should be resolved for this tenant. This mode
depends on the kind of request (e.g. basebackups always go to shard
zero).
- In `handle_get_page_at_lsn_request`, handle the case where the
Timeline we looked up at connection time is not the correct shard for
the page being requested. This can happen whenever one node holds
multiple shards for the same tenant. This is currently written as a
"slow path" with the optimistic expectation that usually we'll run with
one shard per pageserver, and the Timeline resolved at connection time
will be the one serving page requests. There is scope for optimization
here later, to avoid doing the full shard lookup for each page.
- Omit consumption metrics from nonzero shards: only the 0th shard is
responsible for tracing accurate relation sizes.
Note to reviewers:
- Testing of these changes is happening separately on the
`jcsp/sharding-pt1` branch, where we have hacked neon_local etc needed
to run a test_pg_regress.
- The main caveat to this implementation is that page service
connections still look up one Timeline when the connection is opened,
before they know which pages are going to be read. If there is one shard
per pageserver then this will always also be the Timeline that serves
page requests. However, if multiple shards are on one pageserver then
get page requests will incur the cost of looking up the correct Timeline
on each getpage request. We may look to improve this in future with a
"sticky" timeline per connection handler so that subsequent requests for
the same Timeline don't have to look up again, and/or by having postgres
pass a shard hint when connecting. This is tracked in the "Loose ends"
section of https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/5507
(includes two preparatory commits from
https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/pull/5960)
## Problem
To accommodate multiple shards in the same tenant on the same
pageserver, we must include the full TenantShardId in local paths. That
means that all code touching local storage needs to see the
TenantShardId.
## Summary of changes
- Replace `tenant_id: TenantId` with `tenant_shard_id: TenantShardId` on
Tenant, Timeline and RemoteTimelineClient.
- Use TenantShardId in helpers for building local paths.
- Update all the relevant call sites.
This doesn't update absolutely everything: things like PageCache,
TaskMgr, WalRedo are still shard-naive. The purpose of this PR is to
update the core types so that others code can be added/updated
incrementally without churning the most central shared types.
## Problem
The TenantShardId in API URLs is sufficient to uniquely identify a
tenant shard, but not for it to function: it also needs to know its full
sharding configuration (stripe size, layout version) in order to map
keys to shards.
## Summary of changes
- Introduce ShardIdentity: this is the superset of ShardIndex (#5924 )
that is required for translating keys to shard numbers.
- Include ShardIdentity as an optional attribute of LocationConf
- Extend the public `LocationConfig` API structure with a flat
representation of shard attributes.
The net result is that at the point we construct a `Tenant`, we have a
`ShardIdentity` (inside LocationConf). This enables the next steps to
actually use the ShardIdentity to split WAL and validate that page
service requires are reaching the correct shard.
## Problem
For sharded tenants, the layer keys must include the shard number and
shard count, to disambiguate keys written by different shards in the
same tenant (shard number), and disambiguate layers written before and
after splits (shard count).
Closes: https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/5924
## Summary of changes
There are no functional changes in this PR: everything behaves the same
for the default ShardIndex::unsharded() value. Actual construct of
sharded tenants will come next.
- Add a ShardIndex type: this is just a wrapper for a ShardCount and
ShardNumber. This is a subset of ShardIdentity: whereas ShardIdentity
contains enough information to filter page keys, ShardIndex contains
just enough information to construct a remote key. ShardIndex has a
compact encoding, the same as the shard part of TenantShardId.
- Store the ShardIndex as part of IndexLayerMetadata, if it is set to a
different value than ShardIndex::unsharded.
- Update RemoteTimelineClient and DeletionQueue to construct paths using
the layer metadata. Deletion code paths that previously just passed a
`Generation` now pass a full `LayerFileMetadata` to capture the shard as
well.
Notes to reviewers:
- In deletion code paths, I could have used a (Generation, ShardIndex)
instead of the full LayerFileMetadata. I opted for the full object
partly for brevity, and partly because in future when we add checksums
the deletion code really will care about the full metadata in order to
validate that it is deleting what was intended.
- While ShardIdentity and TenantShardId could both use a ShardIndex, I
find that they read more cleanly as "flat" structs that spell out the
shard count and number field separately. Serialization code would need
writing out by hand anyway, because TenantShardId's serialized form is
not a serde struct-style serialization.
- ShardIndex doesn't _have_ to exist (we could use ShardIdentity
everywhere), but it is a worthwhile optimization, as we will have many
copies of this as part of layer metadata. In future the size difference
betweedn ShardIndex and ShardIdentity may become larger if we implement
more sophisticated key distribution mechanisms (i.e. new values of
ShardIdentity::layout).
---------
Co-authored-by: Christian Schwarz <christian@neon.tech>
## Problem
When using TenantId as the key, we are unable to handle multiple tenant
shards attached to the same pageserver for the same tenant ID. This is
an expected scenario if we have e.g. 8 shards and 5 pageservers.
## Summary of changes
- TenantsMap is now a BTreeMap instead of a HashMap: this enables
looking up by range. In future, we will need this for page_service, as
incoming requests will just specify the Key, and we'll have to figure
out which shard to route it to.
- A new key type TenantShardId is introduced, to act as the key in
TenantsMap, and as the id type in external APIs. Its human readable
serialization is backward compatible with TenantId, and also
forward-compatible as long as sharding is not actually used (when we
construct a TenantShardId with ShardCount(0), it serializes to an
old-fashioned TenantId).
- Essential tenant APIs are updated to accept TenantShardIds:
tenant/timeline create, tenant delete, and /location_conf. These are the
APIs that will enable driving sharded tenants. Other apis like /attach
/detach /load /ignore will not work with sharding: those will soon be
deprecated and replaced with /location_conf as part of the live
migration work.
Closes: #5787
