Delete data from s3 when timeline deletion is requested
## Summary of changes
UploadQueue is altered to support scheduling of delete operations in
stopped state. This looks weird, and I'm thinking whether there are
better options/refactorings for upload client to make it look better.
Probably can be part of https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/4378
Deletion is implemented directly in existing endpoint because changes are not
that significant. If we want more safety we can separate those or create
feature flag for new behavior.
resolves [#4193](https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/4193)
---------
Co-authored-by: Joonas Koivunen <joonas@neon.tech>
- Remove repeated tenant & timeline from span
- Demote logging of the path to debug level
- Log completion at info level, in the same function where we log errors
- distinguish between layer file download success & on-demand download
succeeding as a whole in the log message wording
- Assert that the span contains a tenant id and a timeline id
fixes https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/3945
Before:
```
INFO compaction_loop{tenant_id=$TENANT_ID}:compact_timeline{timeline=$TIMELINE_ID}:download_remote_layer{tenant_id=$TENANT_ID timeline_id=$TIMELINE_ID layer=000000000000000000000000000000000000-FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF__00000000020C8A71-00000000020CAF91}: download complete: /storage/pageserver/data/tenants/$TENANT_ID/timelines/$TIMELINE_ID/000000000000000000000000000000000000-FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF__00000000020C8A71-00000000020CAF91
INFO compaction_loop{tenant_id=$TENANT_ID}:compact_timeline{timeline=$TIMELINE_ID}:download_remote_layer{tenant_id=$TENANT_ID timeline_id=$TIMELINE_ID layer=000000000000000000000000000000000000-FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF__00000000020C8A71-00000000020CAF91}: Rebuilt layer map. Did 9 insertions to process a batch of 1 updates.
```
After:
```
INFO compaction_loop{tenant_id=$TENANT_ID}:compact_timeline{timeline=$TIMELINE_ID}:download_remote_layer{layer=000000000000000000000000000000000000-FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF__00000000020C8A71-00000000020CAF91}: layer file download finished
INFO compaction_loop{tenant_id=$TENANT_ID}:compact_timeline{timeline=$TIMELINE_ID}:download_remote_layer{layer=000000000000000000000000000000000000-FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF__00000000020C8A71-00000000020CAF91}: Rebuilt layer map. Did 9 insertions to process a batch of 1 updates.
INFO compaction_loop{tenant_id=$TENANT_ID}:compact_timeline{timeline=$TIMELINE_ID}:download_remote_layer{layer=000000000000000000000000000000000000-FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF__00000000020C8A71-00000000020CAF91}: on-demand download successful
```
See https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/pull/3991
Brings the changes back with the right way to use new `toml_edit` to
deserialize values and a unit test for this.
All non-trivial updates extracted into separate commits, also `carho hakari` data and its manifest format were updated.
3 sets of crates remain unupdated:
* `base64` — touches proxy in a lot of places and changed its api (by 0.21 version) quite strongly since our version (0.13).
* `opentelemetry` and `opentelemetry-*` crates
```
error[E0308]: mismatched types
--> libs/tracing-utils/src/http.rs:65:21
|
65 | span.set_parent(parent_ctx);
| ---------- ^^^^^^^^^^ expected struct `opentelemetry_api::context::Context`, found struct `opentelemetry::Context`
| |
| arguments to this method are incorrect
|
= note: struct `opentelemetry::Context` and struct `opentelemetry_api::context::Context` have similar names, but are actually distinct types
note: struct `opentelemetry::Context` is defined in crate `opentelemetry_api`
--> /Users/someonetoignore/.cargo/registry/src/github.com-1ecc6299db9ec823/opentelemetry_api-0.19.0/src/context.rs:77:1
|
77 | pub struct Context {
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
note: struct `opentelemetry_api::context::Context` is defined in crate `opentelemetry_api`
--> /Users/someonetoignore/.cargo/registry/src/github.com-1ecc6299db9ec823/opentelemetry_api-0.18.0/src/context.rs:77:1
|
77 | pub struct Context {
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
= note: perhaps two different versions of crate `opentelemetry_api` are being used?
note: associated function defined here
--> /Users/someonetoignore/.cargo/registry/src/github.com-1ecc6299db9ec823/tracing-opentelemetry-0.18.0/src/span_ext.rs:43:8
|
43 | fn set_parent(&self, cx: Context);
| ^^^^^^^^^^
For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0308`.
error: could not compile `tracing-utils` due to previous error
warning: build failed, waiting for other jobs to finish...
error: could not compile `tracing-utils` due to previous error
```
`tracing-opentelemetry` of version `0.19` is not yet released, that is supposed to have the update we need.
* similarly, `rustls`, `tokio-rustls`, `rustls-*` and `tls-listener` crates have similar issue:
```
error[E0308]: mismatched types
--> libs/postgres_backend/tests/simple_select.rs:112:78
|
112 | let mut make_tls_connect = tokio_postgres_rustls::MakeRustlsConnect::new(client_cfg);
| --------------------------------------------- ^^^^^^^^^^ expected struct `rustls::client::client_conn::ClientConfig`, found struct `ClientConfig`
| |
| arguments to this function are incorrect
|
= note: struct `ClientConfig` and struct `rustls::client::client_conn::ClientConfig` have similar names, but are actually distinct types
note: struct `ClientConfig` is defined in crate `rustls`
--> /Users/someonetoignore/.cargo/registry/src/github.com-1ecc6299db9ec823/rustls-0.21.0/src/client/client_conn.rs:125:1
|
125 | pub struct ClientConfig {
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
note: struct `rustls::client::client_conn::ClientConfig` is defined in crate `rustls`
--> /Users/someonetoignore/.cargo/registry/src/github.com-1ecc6299db9ec823/rustls-0.20.8/src/client/client_conn.rs:91:1
|
91 | pub struct ClientConfig {
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
= note: perhaps two different versions of crate `rustls` are being used?
note: associated function defined here
--> /Users/someonetoignore/.cargo/registry/src/github.com-1ecc6299db9ec823/tokio-postgres-rustls-0.9.0/src/lib.rs:23:12
|
23 | pub fn new(config: ClientConfig) -> Self {
| ^^^
For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0308`.
error: could not compile `postgres_backend` due to previous error
warning: build failed, waiting for other jobs to finish...
```
* aws crates: I could not make new API to work with bucket endpoint overload, and console e2e tests failed.
Other our tests passed, further investigation is worth to be done in https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/4008
All non-trivial updates extracted into separate commits, also `carho
hakari` data and its manifest format were updated.
3 sets of crates remain unupdated:
* `base64` — touches proxy in a lot of places and changed its api (by
0.21 version) quite strongly since our version (0.13).
* `opentelemetry` and `opentelemetry-*` crates
```
error[E0308]: mismatched types
--> libs/tracing-utils/src/http.rs:65:21
|
65 | span.set_parent(parent_ctx);
| ---------- ^^^^^^^^^^ expected struct `opentelemetry_api::context::Context`, found struct `opentelemetry::Context`
| |
| arguments to this method are incorrect
|
= note: struct `opentelemetry::Context` and struct `opentelemetry_api::context::Context` have similar names, but are actually distinct types
note: struct `opentelemetry::Context` is defined in crate `opentelemetry_api`
--> /Users/someonetoignore/.cargo/registry/src/github.com-1ecc6299db9ec823/opentelemetry_api-0.19.0/src/context.rs:77:1
|
77 | pub struct Context {
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
note: struct `opentelemetry_api::context::Context` is defined in crate `opentelemetry_api`
--> /Users/someonetoignore/.cargo/registry/src/github.com-1ecc6299db9ec823/opentelemetry_api-0.18.0/src/context.rs:77:1
|
77 | pub struct Context {
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
= note: perhaps two different versions of crate `opentelemetry_api` are being used?
note: associated function defined here
--> /Users/someonetoignore/.cargo/registry/src/github.com-1ecc6299db9ec823/tracing-opentelemetry-0.18.0/src/span_ext.rs:43:8
|
43 | fn set_parent(&self, cx: Context);
| ^^^^^^^^^^
For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0308`.
error: could not compile `tracing-utils` due to previous error
warning: build failed, waiting for other jobs to finish...
error: could not compile `tracing-utils` due to previous error
```
`tracing-opentelemetry` of version `0.19` is not yet released, that is
supposed to have the update we need.
* similarly, `rustls`, `tokio-rustls`, `rustls-*` and `tls-listener`
crates have similar issue:
```
error[E0308]: mismatched types
--> libs/postgres_backend/tests/simple_select.rs:112:78
|
112 | let mut make_tls_connect = tokio_postgres_rustls::MakeRustlsConnect::new(client_cfg);
| --------------------------------------------- ^^^^^^^^^^ expected struct `rustls::client::client_conn::ClientConfig`, found struct `ClientConfig`
| |
| arguments to this function are incorrect
|
= note: struct `ClientConfig` and struct `rustls::client::client_conn::ClientConfig` have similar names, but are actually distinct types
note: struct `ClientConfig` is defined in crate `rustls`
--> /Users/someonetoignore/.cargo/registry/src/github.com-1ecc6299db9ec823/rustls-0.21.0/src/client/client_conn.rs:125:1
|
125 | pub struct ClientConfig {
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
note: struct `rustls::client::client_conn::ClientConfig` is defined in crate `rustls`
--> /Users/someonetoignore/.cargo/registry/src/github.com-1ecc6299db9ec823/rustls-0.20.8/src/client/client_conn.rs:91:1
|
91 | pub struct ClientConfig {
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
= note: perhaps two different versions of crate `rustls` are being used?
note: associated function defined here
--> /Users/someonetoignore/.cargo/registry/src/github.com-1ecc6299db9ec823/tokio-postgres-rustls-0.9.0/src/lib.rs:23:12
|
23 | pub fn new(config: ClientConfig) -> Self {
| ^^^
For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0308`.
error: could not compile `postgres_backend` due to previous error
warning: build failed, waiting for other jobs to finish...
```
* aws crates: I could not make new API to work with bucket endpoint
overload, and console e2e tests failed.
Other our tests passed, further investigation is worth to be done in
https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/4008
