## Problem
We already made a change in #6407 to make pitr_interval authoritative
for synthetic size calculations (do not charge users for data retained
due to gc_horizon), but that change didn't cover the case where someone
entirely disables time-based retention by setting pitr_interval=0
Relates to: https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/6374
## Summary of changes
When pitr_interval is zero, do not set `pitr_cutoff` based on
gc_horizon.
gc_horizon is still enforced, but separately (its value is passed
separately, there was never a need to claim pitr_cutoff to gc_horizon)
## More detail
### Issue 1
Before this PR, we would skip the update_gc_info for timelines with
last_record_lsn() < gc_horizon.
Let's call such timelines "tiny".
The rationale for that presumably was that we can't GC anything in the
tiny timelines, why bother to call update_gc_info().
However, synthetic size calculation relies on up-to-date
update_gc_info() data.
Before this PR, tiny timelines would never get an updated
GcInfo::pitr_horizon (it remained Lsn(0)).
Even on projects with pitr_interval=0d.
With this PR, update_gc_info is always called, hence
GcInfo::pitr_horizon is always updated, thereby
providing synthetic size calculation with up-to-data data.
### Issue 2
Before this PR, regardless of whether the timeline is "tiny" or not,
GcInfo::pitr_horizon was clamped to at least last_record_lsn -
gc_horizon, even if the pitr window in terms of LSN range was shorter
(=less than) the gc_horizon.
With this PR, that clamping is removed, so, for pitr_interval=0, the
pitr_horizon = last_record_lsn.
ee9ec26808