Files
neon/test_runner/performance/test_bulk_insert.py
Vlad Lazar a37a2af69e wip
2024-07-26 11:52:03 +01:00

77 lines
2.9 KiB
Python

from contextlib import closing
import pytest
from fixtures.benchmark_fixture import MetricReport
from fixtures.common_types import Lsn
from fixtures.compare_fixtures import NeonCompare, PgCompare
from fixtures.pg_version import PgVersion
#
# Run bulk INSERT test.
#
# Collects metrics:
#
# 1. Time to INSERT 5 million rows
# 2. Disk writes
# 3. Disk space used
# 4. Peak memory usage
#
def test_bulk_insert(neon_with_baseline: PgCompare):
env = neon_with_baseline
start_lsn = Lsn(env.pg.safe_psql("SELECT pg_current_wal_lsn()")[0][0])
with closing(env.pg.connect()) as conn:
with conn.cursor() as cur:
cur.execute("create table huge (i int, j int);")
# Run INSERT, recording the time and I/O it takes
with env.record_pageserver_writes("pageserver_writes"):
with env.record_duration("insert"):
cur.execute("insert into huge values (generate_series(1, 5000000), 0);")
env.flush()
env.report_peak_memory_use()
env.report_size()
# Report amount of wal written. Useful for comparing vanilla wal format vs
# neon wal format, measuring neon write amplification, etc.
end_lsn = Lsn(env.pg.safe_psql("SELECT pg_current_wal_lsn()")[0][0])
wal_written_bytes = end_lsn - start_lsn
wal_written_mb = round(wal_written_bytes / (1024 * 1024))
env.zenbenchmark.record("wal_written", wal_written_mb, "MB", MetricReport.TEST_PARAM)
# When testing neon, also check how long it takes the pageserver to reingest the
# wal from safekeepers. If this number is close to total runtime, then the pageserver
# is the bottleneck.
if isinstance(env, NeonCompare):
measure_recovery_time(env)
def measure_recovery_time(env: NeonCompare):
client = env.env.pageserver.http_client()
pg_version = PgVersion(client.timeline_detail(env.tenant, env.timeline)["pg_version"])
# Delete the Tenant in the pageserver: this will drop local and remote layers, such that
# when we "create" the Tenant again, we will replay the WAL from the beginning.
#
# This is a "weird" thing to do, and can confuse the storage controller as we're re-using
# the same tenant ID for a tenant that is logically different from the pageserver's point
# of view, but the same as far as the safekeeper/WAL is concerned. To work around that,
# we will explicitly create the tenant in the same generation that it was previously
# attached in.
attach_status = env.env.storage_controller.inspect(tenant_shard_id=env.tenant)
assert attach_status is not None
(attach_gen, _) = attach_status
client.tenant_delete(env.tenant)
env.env.pageserver.tenant_create(tenant_id=env.tenant, generation=attach_gen)
# Measure recovery time
with env.record_duration("wal_recovery"):
client.timeline_create(pg_version, env.tenant, env.timeline)
# Flush, which will also wait for lsn to catch up
env.flush()