Files
neon/test_runner
Christian Schwarz 3220f830b7 pageserver: use a single tokio runtime (#6555)
Before this PR, each core had 3 executor threads from 3 different
runtimes. With this PR, we just have one runtime, with one thread per
core. Switching to a single tokio runtime should reduce that effective
over-commit of CPU and in theory help with tail latencies -- iff all
tokio tasks are well-behaved and yield to the runtime regularly.

Are All Tasks Well-Behaved? Are We Ready?
-----------------------------------------

Sadly there doesn't seem to be good out-of-the box tokio tooling to
answer this question.

We *believe* all tasks are well behaved in today's code base, as of the
switch to `virtual_file_io_engine = "tokio-epoll-uring"` in production
(https://github.com/neondatabase/aws/pull/1121).

The only remaining executor-thread-blocking code is walredo and some
filesystem namespace operations.

Filesystem namespace operations work is being tracked in #6663 and not
considered likely to actually block at this time.

Regarding walredo, it currently does a blocking `poll` for read/write to
the pipe file descriptors we use for IPC with the walredo process.
There is an ongoing experiment to make walredo async (#6628), but it
needs more time because there are surprisingly tricky trade-offs that
are articulated in that PR's description (which itself is still WIP).
What's relevant for *this* PR is that
1. walredo is always CPU-bound
2. production tail latencies for walredo request-response
(`pageserver_wal_redo_seconds_bucket`) are
  - p90: with few exceptions, low hundreds of micro-seconds
  - p95: except on very packed pageservers, below 1ms
  - p99: all below 50ms, vast majority below 1ms
  - p99.9: almost all around 50ms, rarely at >= 70ms
- [Dashboard
Link](https://neonprod.grafana.net/d/edgggcrmki3uof/2024-03-walredo-latency?orgId=1&var-ds=ZNX49CDVz&var-pXX_by_instance=0.9&var-pXX_by_instance=0.99&var-pXX_by_instance=0.95&var-adhoc=instance%7C%21%3D%7Cpageserver-30.us-west-2.aws.neon.tech&var-per_instance_pXX_max_seconds=0.0005&from=1711049688777&to=1711136088777)

The ones below 1ms are below our current threshold for when we start
thinking about yielding to the executor.
The tens of milliseconds stalls aren't great, but, not least because of
the implicit overcommit of CPU by the three runtimes, we can't be sure
whether these tens of milliseconds are inherently necessary to do the
walredo work or whether we could be faster if there was less contention
for CPU.

On the first item (walredo being always CPU-bound work): it means that
walredo processes will always compete with the executor threads.
We could yield, using async walredo, but then we hit the trade-offs
explained in that PR.

tl;dr: the risk of stalling executor threads through blocking walredo
seems low, and switching to one runtime cleans up one potential source
for higher-than-necessary stall times (explained in the previous
paragraphs).


Code Changes
------------

- Remove the 3 different runtime definitions.
- Add a new definition called `THE_RUNTIME`.
- Use it in all places that previously used one of the 3 removed
runtimes.
- Remove the argument from `task_mgr`.
- Fix failpoint usage where `pausable_failpoint!` should have been used.
We encountered some actual failures because of this, e.g., hung
`get_metric()` calls during test teardown that would client-timeout
after 300s.

As indicated by the comment above `THE_RUNTIME`, we could take this
clean-up further.
But before we create so much churn, let's first validate that there's no
perf regression.


Performance
-----------

We will test this in staging using the various nightly benchmark runs.

However, the worst-case impact of this change is likely compaction
(=>image layer creation) competing with compute requests.
Image layer creation work can't be easily generated & repeated quickly
by pagebench.
So, we'll simply watch getpage & basebackup tail latencies in staging.

Additionally, I have done manual benchmarking using pagebench.
Report:
https://neondatabase.notion.site/2024-03-23-oneruntime-change-benchmarking-22a399c411e24399a73311115fb703ec?pvs=4
Tail latencies and throughput are marginally better (no regression =
good).
Except in a workload with 128 clients against one tenant.
There, the p99.9 and p99.99 getpage latency is about 2x worse (at
slightly lower throughput).
A dip in throughput every 20s (compaction_period_ is clearly visible,
and probably responsible for that worse tail latency.
This has potential to improve with async walredo, and is an edge case
workload anyway.


Future Work
-----------

1. Once this change has shown satisfying results in production, change
the codebase to use the ambient runtime instead of explicitly
referencing `THE_RUNTIME`.
2. Have a mode where we run with a single-threaded runtime, so we
uncover executor stalls more quickly.
3. Switch or write our own failpoints library that is async-native:
https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/7216
2024-03-23 19:25:11 +01:00
..

Neon test runner

This directory contains integration tests.

Prerequisites:

  • Correctly configured Python, see /docs/sourcetree.md
  • Neon and Postgres binaries
    • See the root README.md for build directions If you want to test tests with test-only APIs, you would need to add --features testing to Rust code build commands. For convenience, repository cargo config contains build_testing alias, that serves as a subcommand, adding the required feature flags. Usage example: cargo build_testing --release is equivalent to cargo build --features testing --release
    • Tests can be run from the git tree; or see the environment variables below to run from other directories.
  • The neon git repo, including the postgres submodule (for some tests, e.g. pg_regress)

Test Organization

Regression tests are in the 'regress' directory. They can be run in parallel to minimize total runtime. Most regression test sets up their environment with its own pageservers and safekeepers (but see TEST_SHARED_FIXTURES).

'pg_clients' contains tests for connecting with various client libraries. Each client test uses a Dockerfile that pulls an image that contains the client, and connects to PostgreSQL with it. The client tests can be run against an existing PostgreSQL or Neon installation.

'performance' contains performance regression tests. Each test exercises a particular scenario or workload, and outputs measurements. They should be run serially, to avoid the tests interfering with the performance of each other. Some performance tests set up their own Neon environment, while others can be run against an existing PostgreSQL or Neon environment.

Running the tests

There is a wrapper script to invoke pytest: ./scripts/pytest. It accepts all the arguments that are accepted by pytest. Depending on your installation options pytest might be invoked directly.

Test state (postgres data, pageserver state, and log files) will be stored under a directory test_output.

You can run all the tests with:

./scripts/pytest

If you want to run all the tests in a particular file:

./scripts/pytest test_pgbench.py

If you want to run all tests that have the string "bench" in their names:

./scripts/pytest -k bench

To run tests in parellel we utilize pytest-xdist plugin. By default everything runs single threaded. Number of workers can be specified with -n argument:

./scripts/pytest -n4

By default performance tests are excluded. To run them explicitly pass performance tests selection to the script:

./scripts/pytest test_runner/performance

Useful environment variables:

NEON_BIN: The directory where neon binaries can be found. POSTGRES_DISTRIB_DIR: The directory where postgres distribution can be found. Since pageserver supports several postgres versions, POSTGRES_DISTRIB_DIR must contain a subdirectory for each version with naming convention v{PG_VERSION}/. Inside that dir, a bin/postgres binary should be present. DEFAULT_PG_VERSION: The version of Postgres to use, This is used to construct full path to the postgres binaries. Format is 2-digit major version nubmer, i.e. DEFAULT_PG_VERSION="14". Alternatively, you can use --pg-version argument. TEST_OUTPUT: Set the directory where test state and test output files should go. TEST_SHARED_FIXTURES: Try to re-use a single pageserver for all the tests. NEON_PAGESERVER_OVERRIDES: add a ;-separated set of configs that will be passed as RUST_LOG: logging configuration to pass into Neon CLI

Useful parameters and commands:

--pageserver-config-override=${value} -c values to pass into pageserver through neon_local cli

--preserve-database-files to preserve pageserver (layer) and safekeer (segment) timeline files on disk after running a test suite. Such files might be large, so removed by default; but might be useful for debugging or creation of svg images with layer file contents.

Let stdout, stderr and INFO log messages go to the terminal instead of capturing them: ./scripts/pytest -s --log-cli-level=INFO ... (Note many tests capture subprocess outputs separately, so this may not show much.)

Exit after the first test failure: ./scripts/pytest -x ... (there are many more pytest options; run pytest -h to see them.)

Writing a test

Every test needs a Neon Environment, or NeonEnv to operate in. A Neon Environment is like a little cloud-in-a-box, and consists of a Pageserver, 0-N Safekeepers, and compute Postgres nodes. The connections between them can be configured to use JWT authentication tokens, and some other configuration options can be tweaked too.

The easiest way to get access to a Neon Environment is by using the neon_simple_env fixture. The 'simple' env may be shared across multiple tests, so don't shut down the nodes or make other destructive changes in that environment. Also don't assume that there are no tenants or branches or data in the cluster. For convenience, there is a branch called empty, though. The convention is to create a test-specific branch of that and load any test data there, instead of the 'main' branch.

For more complicated cases, you can build a custom Neon Environment, with the neon_env fixture:

def test_foobar(neon_env_builder: NeonEnvBuilder):
    # Prescribe the environment.
    # We want to have 3 safekeeper nodes, and use JWT authentication in the
    # connections to the page server
    neon_env_builder.num_safekeepers = 3
    neon_env_builder.set_pageserver_auth(True)

    # Now create the environment. This initializes the repository, and starts
    # up the page server and the safekeepers
    env = neon_env_builder.init_start()

    # Run the test
    ...

For more information about pytest fixtures, see https://docs.pytest.org/en/stable/fixture.html

At the end of a test, all the nodes in the environment are automatically stopped, so you don't need to worry about cleaning up. Logs and test data are preserved for the analysis, in a directory under ../test_output/<testname>

Before submitting a patch

Ensure that you pass all obligatory checks.

Also consider:

  • Writing a couple of docstrings to clarify the reasoning behind a new test.
  • Adding more type hints to your code to avoid Any, especially:
    • For fixture parameters, they are not automatically deduced.
    • For function arguments and return values.