Files
neon/pageserver/src/tenant/delete.rs
Christian Schwarz b30b15e7cb refactor(Timeline::shutdown): rely more on Timeline::cancel; use it from deletion code path (#7233)
This PR is a fallout from work on #7062.

# Changes

- Unify the freeze-and-flush and hard shutdown code paths into a single
method `Timeline::shutdown` that takes the shutdown mode as an argument.
- Replace `freeze_and_flush` bool arg in callers with that mode
argument, makes them more expressive.
- Switch timeline deletion to use `Timeline::shutdown` instead of its
own slightly-out-of-sync copy.
- Remove usage of `task_mgr::shutdown_watcher` /
`task_mgr::shutdown_token` where possible

# Future Work

Do we really need the freeze_and_flush?
If we could get rid of it, then there'd be no need for a specific
shutdown order.

Also, if you undo this patch's changes to the `eviction_task.rs` and
enable RUST_LOG=debug, it's easy to see that we do leave some task
hanging that logs under span `Connection{...}` at debug level. I think
it's a pre-existing issue; it's probably a broker client task.
2024-04-03 17:49:54 +02:00

636 lines
24 KiB
Rust

use std::sync::Arc;
use anyhow::Context;
use camino::{Utf8Path, Utf8PathBuf};
use pageserver_api::{models::TenantState, shard::TenantShardId};
use remote_storage::{GenericRemoteStorage, RemotePath, TimeoutOrCancel};
use tokio::sync::OwnedMutexGuard;
use tokio_util::sync::CancellationToken;
use tracing::{error, instrument, Instrument};
use utils::{backoff, completion, crashsafe, fs_ext, id::TimelineId};
use crate::{
config::PageServerConf,
context::RequestContext,
task_mgr::{self, TaskKind},
tenant::{
mgr::{TenantSlot, TenantsMapRemoveResult},
timeline::ShutdownMode,
},
};
use super::{
mgr::{GetTenantError, TenantSlotError, TenantSlotUpsertError, TenantsMap},
remote_timeline_client::{FAILED_REMOTE_OP_RETRIES, FAILED_UPLOAD_WARN_THRESHOLD},
span,
timeline::delete::DeleteTimelineFlow,
tree_sort_timelines, DeleteTimelineError, Tenant, TenantPreload,
};
#[derive(Debug, thiserror::Error)]
pub(crate) enum DeleteTenantError {
#[error("GetTenant {0}")]
Get(#[from] GetTenantError),
#[error("Tenant not attached")]
NotAttached,
#[error("Invalid state {0}. Expected Active or Broken")]
InvalidState(TenantState),
#[error("Tenant deletion is already in progress")]
AlreadyInProgress,
#[error("Tenant map slot error {0}")]
SlotError(#[from] TenantSlotError),
#[error("Tenant map slot upsert error {0}")]
SlotUpsertError(#[from] TenantSlotUpsertError),
#[error("Timeline {0}")]
Timeline(#[from] DeleteTimelineError),
#[error("Cancelled")]
Cancelled,
#[error(transparent)]
Other(#[from] anyhow::Error),
}
type DeletionGuard = tokio::sync::OwnedMutexGuard<DeleteTenantFlow>;
fn remote_tenant_delete_mark_path(
conf: &PageServerConf,
tenant_shard_id: &TenantShardId,
) -> anyhow::Result<RemotePath> {
let tenant_remote_path = conf
.tenant_path(tenant_shard_id)
.strip_prefix(&conf.workdir)
.context("Failed to strip workdir prefix")
.and_then(RemotePath::new)
.context("tenant path")?;
Ok(tenant_remote_path.join(Utf8Path::new("timelines/deleted")))
}
async fn create_remote_delete_mark(
conf: &PageServerConf,
remote_storage: &GenericRemoteStorage,
tenant_shard_id: &TenantShardId,
cancel: &CancellationToken,
) -> Result<(), DeleteTenantError> {
let remote_mark_path = remote_tenant_delete_mark_path(conf, tenant_shard_id)?;
let data: &[u8] = &[];
backoff::retry(
|| async {
let data = bytes::Bytes::from_static(data);
let stream = futures::stream::once(futures::future::ready(Ok(data)));
remote_storage
.upload(stream, 0, &remote_mark_path, None, cancel)
.await
},
TimeoutOrCancel::caused_by_cancel,
FAILED_UPLOAD_WARN_THRESHOLD,
FAILED_REMOTE_OP_RETRIES,
"mark_upload",
cancel,
)
.await
.ok_or_else(|| anyhow::Error::new(TimeoutOrCancel::Cancel))
.and_then(|x| x)
.context("mark_upload")?;
Ok(())
}
async fn create_local_delete_mark(
conf: &PageServerConf,
tenant_shard_id: &TenantShardId,
) -> Result<(), DeleteTenantError> {
let marker_path = conf.tenant_deleted_mark_file_path(tenant_shard_id);
// Note: we're ok to replace existing file.
let _ = std::fs::OpenOptions::new()
.write(true)
.create(true)
.truncate(true)
.open(&marker_path)
.with_context(|| format!("could not create delete marker file {marker_path:?}"))?;
crashsafe::fsync_file_and_parent(&marker_path).context("sync_mark")?;
Ok(())
}
async fn schedule_ordered_timeline_deletions(
tenant: &Arc<Tenant>,
) -> Result<Vec<(Arc<tokio::sync::Mutex<DeleteTimelineFlow>>, TimelineId)>, DeleteTenantError> {
// Tenant is stopping at this point. We know it will be deleted.
// No new timelines should be created.
// Tree sort timelines to delete from leafs to the root.
// NOTE: by calling clone we release the mutex which creates a possibility for a race: pending deletion
// can complete and remove timeline from the map in between our call to clone
// and `DeleteTimelineFlow::run`, so `run` wont find timeline in `timelines` map.
// timelines.lock is currently synchronous so we cant hold it across await point.
// So just ignore NotFound error if we get it from `run`.
// Beware: in case it becomes async and we try to hold it here, `run` also locks it, which can create a deadlock.
let timelines = tenant.timelines.lock().unwrap().clone();
let sorted =
tree_sort_timelines(timelines, |t| t.get_ancestor_timeline_id()).context("tree sort")?;
let mut already_running_deletions = vec![];
for (timeline_id, _) in sorted.into_iter().rev() {
let span = tracing::info_span!("timeline_delete", %timeline_id);
let res = DeleteTimelineFlow::run(tenant, timeline_id, true)
.instrument(span)
.await;
if let Err(e) = res {
match e {
DeleteTimelineError::NotFound => {
// Timeline deletion finished after call to clone above but before call
// to `DeleteTimelineFlow::run` and removed timeline from the map.
continue;
}
DeleteTimelineError::AlreadyInProgress(guard) => {
already_running_deletions.push((guard, timeline_id));
continue;
}
e => return Err(DeleteTenantError::Timeline(e)),
}
}
}
Ok(already_running_deletions)
}
async fn ensure_timelines_dir_empty(timelines_path: &Utf8Path) -> Result<(), DeleteTenantError> {
// Assert timelines dir is empty.
if !fs_ext::is_directory_empty(timelines_path).await? {
// Display first 10 items in directory
let list = fs_ext::list_dir(timelines_path).await.context("list_dir")?;
let list = &list.into_iter().take(10).collect::<Vec<_>>();
return Err(DeleteTenantError::Other(anyhow::anyhow!(
"Timelines directory is not empty after all timelines deletion: {list:?}"
)));
}
Ok(())
}
async fn remove_tenant_remote_delete_mark(
conf: &PageServerConf,
remote_storage: Option<&GenericRemoteStorage>,
tenant_shard_id: &TenantShardId,
cancel: &CancellationToken,
) -> Result<(), DeleteTenantError> {
if let Some(remote_storage) = remote_storage {
let path = remote_tenant_delete_mark_path(conf, tenant_shard_id)?;
backoff::retry(
|| async { remote_storage.delete(&path, cancel).await },
TimeoutOrCancel::caused_by_cancel,
FAILED_UPLOAD_WARN_THRESHOLD,
FAILED_REMOTE_OP_RETRIES,
"remove_tenant_remote_delete_mark",
cancel,
)
.await
.ok_or_else(|| anyhow::Error::new(TimeoutOrCancel::Cancel))
.and_then(|x| x)
.context("remove_tenant_remote_delete_mark")?;
}
Ok(())
}
// Cleanup fs traces: tenant config, timelines dir local delete mark, tenant dir
async fn cleanup_remaining_fs_traces(
conf: &PageServerConf,
tenant_shard_id: &TenantShardId,
) -> Result<(), DeleteTenantError> {
let rm = |p: Utf8PathBuf, is_dir: bool| async move {
if is_dir {
tokio::fs::remove_dir(&p).await
} else {
tokio::fs::remove_file(&p).await
}
.or_else(fs_ext::ignore_not_found)
.with_context(|| format!("failed to delete {p}"))
};
rm(conf.tenant_config_path(tenant_shard_id), false).await?;
rm(conf.tenant_location_config_path(tenant_shard_id), false).await?;
fail::fail_point!("tenant-delete-before-remove-timelines-dir", |_| {
Err(anyhow::anyhow!(
"failpoint: tenant-delete-before-remove-timelines-dir"
))?
});
rm(conf.timelines_path(tenant_shard_id), true).await?;
fail::fail_point!("tenant-delete-before-remove-deleted-mark", |_| {
Err(anyhow::anyhow!(
"failpoint: tenant-delete-before-remove-deleted-mark"
))?
});
// Make sure previous deletions are ordered before mark removal.
// Otherwise there is no guarantee that they reach the disk before mark deletion.
// So its possible for mark to reach disk first and for other deletions
// to be reordered later and thus missed if a crash occurs.
// Note that we dont need to sync after mark file is removed
// because we can tolerate the case when mark file reappears on startup.
let tenant_path = &conf.tenant_path(tenant_shard_id);
if tenant_path.exists() {
crashsafe::fsync_async(&conf.tenant_path(tenant_shard_id))
.await
.context("fsync_pre_mark_remove")?;
}
rm(conf.tenant_deleted_mark_file_path(tenant_shard_id), false).await?;
rm(conf.tenant_heatmap_path(tenant_shard_id), false).await?;
fail::fail_point!("tenant-delete-before-remove-tenant-dir", |_| {
Err(anyhow::anyhow!(
"failpoint: tenant-delete-before-remove-tenant-dir"
))?
});
rm(conf.tenant_path(tenant_shard_id), true).await?;
Ok(())
}
/// Orchestrates tenant shut down of all tasks, removes its in-memory structures,
/// and deletes its data from both disk and s3.
/// The sequence of steps:
/// 1. Upload remote deletion mark.
/// 2. Create local mark file.
/// 3. Shutdown tasks
/// 4. Run ordered timeline deletions
/// 5. Wait for timeline deletion operations that were scheduled before tenant deletion was requested
/// 6. Remove remote mark
/// 7. Cleanup remaining fs traces, tenant dir, config, timelines dir, local delete mark
/// It is resumable from any step in case a crash/restart occurs.
/// There are two entrypoints to the process:
/// 1. [`DeleteTenantFlow::run`] this is the main one called by a management api handler.
/// 2. [`DeleteTenantFlow::resume_from_attach`] is called when deletion is resumed tenant is found to be deleted during attach process.
/// Note the only other place that messes around timeline delete mark is the `Tenant::spawn_load` function.
#[derive(Default)]
pub enum DeleteTenantFlow {
#[default]
NotStarted,
InProgress,
Finished,
}
impl DeleteTenantFlow {
// These steps are run in the context of management api request handler.
// Long running steps are continued to run in the background.
// NB: If this fails half-way through, and is retried, the retry will go through
// all the same steps again. Make sure the code here is idempotent, and don't
// error out if some of the shutdown tasks have already been completed!
// NOTE: static needed for background part.
// We assume that calling code sets up the span with tenant_id.
#[instrument(skip_all)]
pub(crate) async fn run(
conf: &'static PageServerConf,
remote_storage: Option<GenericRemoteStorage>,
tenants: &'static std::sync::RwLock<TenantsMap>,
tenant: Arc<Tenant>,
cancel: &CancellationToken,
) -> Result<(), DeleteTenantError> {
span::debug_assert_current_span_has_tenant_id();
pausable_failpoint!("tenant-delete-before-run");
let mut guard = Self::prepare(&tenant).await?;
if let Err(e) =
Self::run_inner(&mut guard, conf, remote_storage.as_ref(), &tenant, cancel).await
{
tenant.set_broken(format!("{e:#}")).await;
return Err(e);
}
Self::schedule_background(guard, conf, remote_storage, tenants, tenant);
Ok(())
}
// Helper function needed to be able to match once on returned error and transition tenant into broken state.
// This is needed because tenant.shutwodn is not idempotent. If tenant state is set to stopping another call to tenant.shutdown
// will result in an error, but here we need to be able to retry shutdown when tenant deletion is retried.
// So the solution is to set tenant state to broken.
async fn run_inner(
guard: &mut OwnedMutexGuard<Self>,
conf: &'static PageServerConf,
remote_storage: Option<&GenericRemoteStorage>,
tenant: &Tenant,
cancel: &CancellationToken,
) -> Result<(), DeleteTenantError> {
guard.mark_in_progress()?;
fail::fail_point!("tenant-delete-before-create-remote-mark", |_| {
Err(anyhow::anyhow!(
"failpoint: tenant-delete-before-create-remote-mark"
))?
});
// IDEA: implement detach as delete without remote storage. Then they would use the same lock (deletion_progress) so wont contend.
// Though sounds scary, different mark name?
// Detach currently uses remove_dir_all so in case of a crash we can end up in a weird state.
if let Some(remote_storage) = &remote_storage {
create_remote_delete_mark(conf, remote_storage, &tenant.tenant_shard_id, cancel)
.await
.context("remote_mark")?
}
fail::fail_point!("tenant-delete-before-create-local-mark", |_| {
Err(anyhow::anyhow!(
"failpoint: tenant-delete-before-create-local-mark"
))?
});
create_local_delete_mark(conf, &tenant.tenant_shard_id)
.await
.context("local delete mark")?;
fail::fail_point!("tenant-delete-before-background", |_| {
Err(anyhow::anyhow!(
"failpoint: tenant-delete-before-background"
))?
});
Ok(())
}
fn mark_in_progress(&mut self) -> anyhow::Result<()> {
match self {
Self::Finished => anyhow::bail!("Bug. Is in finished state"),
Self::InProgress { .. } => { /* We're in a retry */ }
Self::NotStarted => { /* Fresh start */ }
}
*self = Self::InProgress;
Ok(())
}
pub(crate) async fn should_resume_deletion(
conf: &'static PageServerConf,
remote_mark_exists: bool,
tenant: &Tenant,
) -> Result<Option<DeletionGuard>, DeleteTenantError> {
let acquire = |t: &Tenant| {
Some(
Arc::clone(&t.delete_progress)
.try_lock_owned()
.expect("we're the only owner during init"),
)
};
if remote_mark_exists {
return Ok(acquire(tenant));
}
// Check local mark first, if its there there is no need to go to s3 to check whether remote one exists.
if conf
.tenant_deleted_mark_file_path(&tenant.tenant_shard_id)
.exists()
{
Ok(acquire(tenant))
} else {
Ok(None)
}
}
pub(crate) async fn resume_from_attach(
guard: DeletionGuard,
tenant: &Arc<Tenant>,
preload: Option<TenantPreload>,
tenants: &'static std::sync::RwLock<TenantsMap>,
ctx: &RequestContext,
) -> Result<(), DeleteTenantError> {
let (_, progress) = completion::channel();
tenant
.set_stopping(progress, false, true)
.await
.expect("cant be stopping or broken");
tenant
.attach(preload, super::SpawnMode::Eager, ctx)
.await
.context("attach")?;
Self::background(
guard,
tenant.conf,
tenant.remote_storage.clone(),
tenants,
tenant,
)
.await
}
async fn prepare(
tenant: &Arc<Tenant>,
) -> Result<tokio::sync::OwnedMutexGuard<Self>, DeleteTenantError> {
// FIXME: unsure about active only. Our init jobs may not be cancellable properly,
// so at least for now allow deletions only for active tenants. TODO recheck
// Broken and Stopping is needed for retries.
if !matches!(
tenant.current_state(),
TenantState::Active | TenantState::Broken { .. }
) {
return Err(DeleteTenantError::InvalidState(tenant.current_state()));
}
let guard = Arc::clone(&tenant.delete_progress)
.try_lock_owned()
.map_err(|_| DeleteTenantError::AlreadyInProgress)?;
fail::fail_point!("tenant-delete-before-shutdown", |_| {
Err(anyhow::anyhow!("failpoint: tenant-delete-before-shutdown"))?
});
// make pageserver shutdown not to wait for our completion
let (_, progress) = completion::channel();
// It would be good to only set stopping here and continue shutdown in the background, but shutdown is not idempotent.
// i e it is an error to do:
// tenant.set_stopping
// tenant.shutdown
// Its also bad that we're holding tenants.read here.
// TODO relax set_stopping to be idempotent?
if tenant.shutdown(progress, ShutdownMode::Hard).await.is_err() {
return Err(DeleteTenantError::Other(anyhow::anyhow!(
"tenant shutdown is already in progress"
)));
}
Ok(guard)
}
fn schedule_background(
guard: OwnedMutexGuard<Self>,
conf: &'static PageServerConf,
remote_storage: Option<GenericRemoteStorage>,
tenants: &'static std::sync::RwLock<TenantsMap>,
tenant: Arc<Tenant>,
) {
let tenant_shard_id = tenant.tenant_shard_id;
task_mgr::spawn(
task_mgr::BACKGROUND_RUNTIME.handle(),
TaskKind::TimelineDeletionWorker,
Some(tenant_shard_id),
None,
"tenant_delete",
false,
async move {
if let Err(err) =
Self::background(guard, conf, remote_storage, tenants, &tenant).await
{
error!("Error: {err:#}");
tenant.set_broken(format!("{err:#}")).await;
};
Ok(())
}
.instrument(tracing::info_span!(parent: None, "delete_tenant", tenant_id=%tenant_shard_id.tenant_id, shard_id=%tenant_shard_id.shard_slug())),
);
}
async fn background(
mut guard: OwnedMutexGuard<Self>,
conf: &PageServerConf,
remote_storage: Option<GenericRemoteStorage>,
tenants: &'static std::sync::RwLock<TenantsMap>,
tenant: &Arc<Tenant>,
) -> Result<(), DeleteTenantError> {
// Tree sort timelines, schedule delete for them. Mention retries from the console side.
// Note that if deletion fails we dont mark timelines as broken,
// the whole tenant will become broken as by `Self::schedule_background` logic
let already_running_timeline_deletions = schedule_ordered_timeline_deletions(tenant)
.await
.context("schedule_ordered_timeline_deletions")?;
fail::fail_point!("tenant-delete-before-polling-ongoing-deletions", |_| {
Err(anyhow::anyhow!(
"failpoint: tenant-delete-before-polling-ongoing-deletions"
))?
});
// Wait for deletions that were already running at the moment when tenant deletion was requested.
// When we can lock deletion guard it means that corresponding timeline deletion finished.
for (guard, timeline_id) in already_running_timeline_deletions {
let flow = guard.lock().await;
if !flow.is_finished() {
return Err(DeleteTenantError::Other(anyhow::anyhow!(
"already running timeline deletion failed: {timeline_id}"
)));
}
}
let timelines_path = conf.timelines_path(&tenant.tenant_shard_id);
// May not exist if we fail in cleanup_remaining_fs_traces after removing it
if timelines_path.exists() {
// sanity check to guard against layout changes
ensure_timelines_dir_empty(&timelines_path)
.await
.context("timelines dir not empty")?;
}
remove_tenant_remote_delete_mark(
conf,
remote_storage.as_ref(),
&tenant.tenant_shard_id,
&task_mgr::shutdown_token(),
)
.await?;
pausable_failpoint!("tenant-delete-before-cleanup-remaining-fs-traces-pausable");
fail::fail_point!("tenant-delete-before-cleanup-remaining-fs-traces", |_| {
Err(anyhow::anyhow!(
"failpoint: tenant-delete-before-cleanup-remaining-fs-traces"
))?
});
cleanup_remaining_fs_traces(conf, &tenant.tenant_shard_id)
.await
.context("cleanup_remaining_fs_traces")?;
{
pausable_failpoint!("tenant-delete-before-map-remove");
// This block is simply removing the TenantSlot for this tenant. It requires a loop because
// we might conflict with a TenantSlot::InProgress marker and need to wait for it.
//
// This complexity will go away when we simplify how deletion works:
// https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/5080
loop {
// Under the TenantMap lock, try to remove the tenant. We usually succeed, but if
// we encounter an InProgress marker, yield the barrier it contains and wait on it.
let barrier = {
let mut locked = tenants.write().unwrap();
let removed = locked.remove(tenant.tenant_shard_id);
// FIXME: we should not be modifying this from outside of mgr.rs.
// This will go away when we simplify deletion (https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/5080)
crate::metrics::TENANT_MANAGER
.tenant_slots
.set(locked.len() as u64);
match removed {
TenantsMapRemoveResult::Occupied(TenantSlot::Attached(tenant)) => {
match tenant.current_state() {
TenantState::Stopping { .. } | TenantState::Broken { .. } => {
// Expected: we put the tenant into stopping state before we start deleting it
}
state => {
// Unexpected state
tracing::warn!(
"Tenant in unexpected state {state} after deletion"
);
}
}
break;
}
TenantsMapRemoveResult::Occupied(TenantSlot::Secondary(_)) => {
// This is unexpected: this secondary tenants should not have been created, and we
// are not in a position to shut it down from here.
tracing::warn!("Tenant transitioned to secondary mode while deleting!");
break;
}
TenantsMapRemoveResult::Occupied(TenantSlot::InProgress(_)) => {
unreachable!("TenantsMap::remove handles InProgress separately, should never return it here");
}
TenantsMapRemoveResult::Vacant => {
tracing::warn!(
"Tenant removed from TenantsMap before deletion completed"
);
break;
}
TenantsMapRemoveResult::InProgress(barrier) => {
// An InProgress entry was found, we must wait on its barrier
barrier
}
}
};
tracing::info!(
"Waiting for competing operation to complete before deleting state for tenant"
);
barrier.wait().await;
}
}
*guard = Self::Finished;
Ok(())
}
}