mirror of
https://github.com/neondatabase/neon.git
synced 2026-05-23 08:00:37 +00:00
8c07a36fda
There are two main reasons for that:
a) Latest unfinished record may disapper after compute node restart, so let's
try not leak volatile part of the WAL into the repository. Always use
last_valid_record instead.
That change requires different getPage@LSN logic in postgres -- we need
to ask LSN's that point to some complete record instead of GetFlushRecPtr()
that can point in the middle of the record. That was already done by @knizhnik
to deal with the same problem during the work on `postgres --sync-safekeepers`.
Postgres will use LSN's aligned on 0x8 boundary in get_page requests, so we
also need to be sure that last_valid_record is aligned.
b) Switch to get_last_record_lsn() in basebackup@no_lsn. When compute node
is running without safekeepers and streams WAL directly
to pageserver it is important to match basebackup LSN and LSN of replication
start. Before this commit basebackup@no_lsn was waiting for last_valid_lsn
and walreceiver started replication with last_record_lsn, which can be less.
So replication was failing since compute node doesn't have requested WAL.
## Page server architecture
The Page Server has a few different duties:
- Respond to GetPage@LSN requests from the Compute Nodes
- Receive WAL from WAL safekeeper
- Replay WAL that's applicable to the chunks that the Page Server maintains
- Backup to S3
The Page Server consists of multiple threads that operate on a shared
repository of page versions:
| WAL
V
+--------------+
| |
| WAL receiver |
| |
+--------------+
+----+
+---------+ .......... | |
| | . . | |
GetPage@LSN | | . backup . -------> | S3 |
-------------> | Page | repository . . | |
| Service | .......... | |
page | | +----+
<------------- | |
+---------+ +--------------------+
| Checkpointing / |
| Garbage collection |
+--------------------+
Legend:
+--+
| | A thread or multi-threaded service
+--+
....
. . Component that we will need, but doesn't exist at the moment. A TODO.
....
---> Data flow
<---
Page Service
------------
The Page Service listens for GetPage@LSN requests from the Compute Nodes,
and responds with pages from the repository.
WAL Receiver
------------
The WAL receiver connects to the external WAL safekeeping service (or
directly to the primary) using PostgreSQL physical streaming
replication, and continuously receives WAL. It decodes the WAL records,
and stores them to the repository.
Repository
----------
The repository stores all the page versions, or WAL records needed to
reconstruct them. Each tenant has a separate Repository, which is
stored in the .zenith/tenants/<tenantid> directory.
Repository is an abstract trait, defined in `repository.rs`. It is
implemented by the LayeredRepository object in
`layered_repository.rs`. There is only that one implementation of the
Repository trait, but it's still a useful abstraction that keeps the
interface for the low-level storage functionality clean. The layered
storage format is described in layered_repository/README.md.
Each repository consists of multiple Timelines. Timeline is a
workhorse that accepts page changes from the WAL, and serves
get_page_at_lsn() and get_rel_size() requests. Note: this has nothing
to do with PostgreSQL WAL timeline. The term "timeline" is mostly
interchangeable with "branch", there is a one-to-one mapping from
branch to timeline. A timeline has a unique ID within the tenant,
represented as 16-byte hex string that never changes, whereas a
branch is a user-given name for a timeline.
Each repository also has a WAL redo manager associated with it, see
`walredo.rs`. The WAL redo manager is used to replay PostgreSQL WAL
records, whenever we need to reconstruct a page version from WAL to
satisfy a GetPage@LSN request, or to avoid accumulating too much WAL
for a page. The WAL redo manager uses a Postgres process running in
special zenith wal-redo mode to do the actual WAL redo, and
communicates with the process using a pipe.
Checkpointing / Garbage Collection
----------------------------------
Periodically, the checkpointer thread wakes up and performs housekeeping
duties on the repository. It has two duties:
### Checkpointing
Flush WAL that has accumulated in memory to disk, so that the old WAL
can be truncated away in the WAL safekeepers. Also, to free up memory
for receiving new WAL. This process is called "checkpointing". It's
similar to checkpointing in PostgreSQL or other DBMSs, but in the page
server, checkpointing happens on a per-segment basis.
### Garbage collection
Remove old on-disk layer files that are no longer needed according to the
PITR retention policy
TODO: Backup service
--------------------
The backup service is responsible for periodically pushing the chunks to S3.
TODO: How/when do restore from S3? Whenever we get a GetPage@LSN request for
a chunk we don't currently have? Or when an external Control Plane tells us?
TODO: Sharding
--------------------
We should be able to run multiple Page Servers that handle sharded data.