Files
neon/libs
Christian Schwarz db00eb41a1 fix(spsc_fold): potentially missing wakeup when send()ing in state SenderWaitsForReceiverToConsume (#10318)
# Problem

Before this PR, there were cases where send() in state
SenderWaitsForReceiverToConsume would never be woken up
by the receiver, because it never registered with `wake_sender`.

Example Scenario 1: we stop polling a send() future A that was waiting
for the receiver to consume. We drop A and create a new send() future B.
B would return Poll::Pending and never regsister a waker.

Example Scenario 2: a send() future A transitions from HasData
to SenderWaitsForReceiverToConsume. This registers the context X
with `wake_sender`. But before the Receiver consumes the data,
we poll A from a different context Y.
The state is still SenderWaitsForReceiverToConsume, but we wouldn't
register the new context with `wake_sender`.
When the Receiver comes around to consume and `wake_sender.notify()`s,
it wakes the old context X instead of Y.

# Fix

Register the waker in the case where we're polled in
state `SenderWaitsForReceiverToConsume`.

# Relation to #10309

I found this bug while investigating #10309.
There was never proof that this bug here is the root cause for #10309.
In the meantime we found a more probably hypothesis
for the root cause than what is being fixed here.
Regardless, let's walk through my thought process about
how it might have been relevant:

There (in page_service), Scenario 1 does not apply because
we poll the send() future to completion.

Scenario 2 (`tokio::join!`) also does not apply with the
current `tokio::join!()` impl, because it will just poll each
future every time, each with the same context.
Although if we ever used something like a FuturesUnordered anywhere,
that will be using a different context, so, in that case,
the bug might materialize.

Regarding tokio & spurious poll in general:
@conradludgate is not aware of any spurious wakeup cases in current
tokio,
but within a `tokio::join!()`, any wake meant for one future will poll
all
the futures, so that can appear as a spurious wake up to the N-1 futures
of the `tokio::join!()`.
2025-01-10 11:06:03 +00:00
..