Replace database rule synchronization with native rule operations and file-based backup, import, and recovery. Update firewall management views, descriptions, whitelist handling, and translations.
Include terminal reconnect fixes and xpack build tags for Darwin build targets. Remove temporary regression test files before committing.
* perf(monitor): improve monitor query and chart performance for large ranges
- enable LTTB sampling in the shared line chart to bound rendered points
- empty io/network in monitor search now means no name filter, returning
all device rows in one query instead of fanning out per device
- merge device names recorded in the monitor db into io/network/gpu
options so removed devices stay selectable; move logic to service layer
- add composite indexes (name, created_at) on monitor_ios/monitor_networks
and (product_name, created_at) on monitor_gpus
- stop migrating the unused MonitorGPU model into MonitorDB
- fix the memory param which was compared against "mem" and never matched
* chore(monitor): remove monitor test fixtures
---------
Co-authored-by: ssongliu <sloooop1x@gmail.com>
Port forwarding no longer shares the filter client. FilterClient keeps only
filter capabilities, and forwarding gets its own adapter, service and boot
replay:
- utils/firewall/forwarding holds the provider adapters. firewalld uses native
forward-port, ufw and iptables share the NAT implementation moved out of
client/iptables/forward.go.
- service/forwarding.go owns base info, search, operate, enable and replay.
The API keeps its routes and dispatches on name/type/operate.
- init/firewall replays forwarding through that service instead of loading NAT
rule files inline.
Also adds 1PANEL_FORWARD to the IptablesOp name enum: the frontend already
sends {"name":"1PANEL_FORWARD","operate":"init-forward"} and the validator
rejected it with 400 before reaching the service. Besides that, the only
observable difference is that a forward-tab search no longer triggers the
port/address record cleanup goroutine on the side.
#### What this PR does / why we need it?
Refs https://github.com/1Panel-dev/1Panel/issues/7759
#### Summary of your change
#### Please indicate you've done the following:
- [ ] Made sure tests are passing and test coverage is added if needed.
- [ ] Made sure commit message follow the rule of [Conventional Commits specification](https://www.conventionalcommits.org/).
- [ ] Considered the docs impact and opened a new docs issue or PR with docs changes if needed.